Cited by 33Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Twistorial phase space for complex Ashtekar variables

Open access
Wieland, Wolfgang M·2012·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We generalize the SU (2) spinor framework of twisted geometries developed by Dupuis, Freidel, Livine, Speziale and Tambornino to the Lorentzian case, that is the group . We show that the phase space for complex-valued Ashtekar variables on a spin-network graph can be decomposed in terms of twistorial variables. To every link there are two twistors—one to each boundary point—attached. The formalism provides a new derivation of the solution space of the simplicity constraints of loop quantum gravity. Key properties of the EPRL spinfoam model are perfectly recovered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/29/4/045007

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The constraint solution p = γj and k = j also follows naturally from a spinor formulation of the simplicity constraints.

    “More recently, it has been shown that the constraint solution p = γj and k = j also follows naturally from a spinor formulation of the simplicity constraints [369, 156, 256].”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [369]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Livine E R and Tambornino J 2011 Spinor representation for loop quantum gravity arXiv:1105.3385 · arXiv
  2. Dupuis M and Livine E R 2011 Holomorphic simplicity constraints for 4d spinfoam models arXiv:1104.3683 · arXiv
  3. Livine E, Tambornino J and Speziale S 2011 Twistor networks and covariant twisted geometries arXiv:1108.0369 · arXiv
  4. Dupuis M, Freidel L, Livine E R and Speziale S 2011 Holomorphic Lorentzian simplicity constraints arXiv:1107.5274 · arXiv
  5. Dupuis M and Livine E R 2011 Holomorphic simplicity constraints for 4d Riemannian spinfoam models arXiv:1111.1125 · arXiv
  6. Rovelli C 2008 Quantum Gravity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  7. Thiemann T 2008 Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  8. Ding Y and Rovelli C 2010 The physical boundary Hilbert space and volume operator in the Lorentzian new spin-foam theory Class. Quantum Grav. 27 205003 (arXiv:1006.1294) · arXiv
  9. Ding Y and Rovelli C 2010 The volume operator in covariant quantum gravity Class. Quantum Grav. 27 165003 (arXiv:0911.0543) · arXiv
  10. Wieland W 2010 Complex Ashtekar variables and reality conditions for Holst's action Ann. H Poincaré 1-24 arXiv:1012.1738 · arXiv
  11. Gelfand I M, Minlos R A and Shapiro Z Y 1963 Representations of the rotation and Lorentz groups and their applications (Oxford: Pergamon Press)
  12. Dupuis M, Freidel L, Livine E R and Speziale S 2011 Holomorphic Lorentzian simplicity constraints arXiv:1107.5274 · arXiv
  13. Sexl R and Urbantke H 1975 Relativität Gruppen Teilchen (Vienna: Springer)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wieland, W. M.
Affiliations
Centre de Physique Théorique (FR)
Corresponding author
Wieland, Wolfgang M
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2012-02-02
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
045007
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2043086602
Cited by
33
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
twisted geometry, spin networks, simplicity constraints, loop quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review