Cited by 41Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Twistor networks and covariant twisted geometries

Open access
Livine, Etera R., Speziale, Simone, Tambornino, Johannes·2012·Physical Review D

Abstract

We study the symplectic reduction of the phase space of two twistors to the cotangent bundle of the Lorentz group. We provide expressions for the Lorentz generators and group elements in terms of the spinors defining the twistors. We use this to define twistor networks as a graph carrying the phase space of two twistors on each edge. We also introduce simple twistor networks, which provide a classical version of the simple projected spin networks living on the boundary Hilbert space of Engle, Pereira, Rovelli, Livine and Freidel, Krasnov spin foam models. Finally, we give an expression for the Haar measure in terms of spinors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.85.064002

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The constraint solution p = γj and k = j also follows naturally from a spinor formulation of the simplicity constraints.

    “More recently, it has been shown that the constraint solution p = γj and k = j also follows naturally from a spinor formulation of the simplicity constraints [369, 156, 256].”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [256]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livine, E. R., Speziale, S., & Tambornino, J.
Affiliations
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2012-03-02
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
064002
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2030185009
Cited by
41
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
twistors, symplectic reduction, Lorentz group, spinors, Haar measure, phase space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review