Cited by 60Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Generalized spinfoams

Open access
Ding, You, Han, Muxin, Rovelli, Carlo·2011·Physical Review D

Abstract

We reconsider the spinfoam dynamics that has been recently introduced, in the generalized Kami\ifmmode \acute{n}\else \'{n}\fi{}ski-Kisielowski-Lewandowski (KKL) version where the foam is not dual to a triangulation. We study the Euclidean as well as the Lorentzian case. We show that this theory can still be obtained as a constrained BF theory satisfying the simplicity constraint, now discretized on a general oriented 2-cell complex. This constraint implies that boundary states admit a (quantum) geometrical interpretation in terms of polyhedra, generalizing the tetrahedral geometry of the simplicial case. We also point out that the general solution to this constraint (imposed weakly) depends on a quantum number ${r}_{f}$ in addition to those of loop quantum gravity. We compute the vertex amplitude and recover the KKL amplitude in the Euclidean theory when ${r}_{f}=0$. We comment on the eventual physical relevance of ${r}_{f}$, and the formal way to eliminate it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.83.124020

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For a given j, the allowed values are k = j − r for all half-integers r such that k > 0.

    “In particular, given j, one has k = j − r for all possible half-integers such that k > 0 [140].”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [140]

  • The EPRL amplitudes can be generalized to arbitrary complexes with boundaries given by graphs with nodes of arbitrary valence.

    “as in BF theory, the EPRL amplitudes can be generalized to arbitrary complexes with boundaries given by graphs with nodes of arbitrary valence. The extension of the model to arbitrary complexes was first studied in [237, 236] and has been revisited in [140].”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [140]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, Y., Han, M., & Rovelli, C.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2011-06-09
Volume
83
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W3037467603
Cited by
60
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
simplicity constraints, vertex amplitude, loop quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review