Cited by 66Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Quantum linearization instabilities of de Sitter spacetime. I

Open access
Higuchi, A·1991·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

It is known that all the physical states in linearized gravity are required to be invariant under the continuous isometries of the background spacetime if it is spatially compact. For example, all the physical states in linearized gravity in de Sitter spacetime are required to be SO(4, 1) invariant. A detailed derivation of SO(4, 1) invariance of the physical state is presented. Also, it is found that normal ordering of operators is unnecessary in the constraints which demand SO(4, 1) invariance. Then it is proved that there are no normalizable SO(4, 1)-invariant states other than the vacuum state in the Fock space. This appears to suggest that there would be no dynamics in de Sitter spacetime. A step towards a possible resolution of this paradox will be presented in the sequel to this article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/8/11/009

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The approach provides an overcomplete set of quantum observables, meaning a set whose classical counterparts are overcomplete on the constrained phase space.

    “In the examples we will see that our approach in fact provides an 'overcomplete set' of quantum observables. By this we mean a set of observables whose classical counterparts are overcomplete (see. for example [13]) on the (constrained) phase space.”

    From Quantum observables and recollapsing dynamics (1995) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Misner C W , Thorne K S and Wheeler J A 1973 Grovitofion (San Francisco: Freeman) Moncrief V 1986 private communication ed L Witten (New York: Wiley)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higuchi, A.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Higuchi, A
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1991-11-01
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
1961-1981
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W4237561863
Cited by
66
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (8716803)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
de Sitter space, linearized gravity, isometries, normalizability, Fock space, vacuum state, normal ordering, dynamical spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review