Cited by 54Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

Markovianity criteria for quantum evolution

Open access
Chruściński, Dariusz, Kossakowski, Andrzej·2012·Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics

Abstract

We characterize a class of Markovian dynamics using the concept of a divisible dynamical map. Moreover, we provide a family of criteria which can distinguish Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics. These Markovianity criteria are based on a simple observation that Markovian dynamics implies monotonic behaviour of several well-known quantities such as distinguishability of states, fidelity, relative entropy and genuine entanglement measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0953-4075/45/15/154002

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An operator is the generator of a quantum Markov or divisible process exactly when it can be written in the Gorini-Kossakowski-Susarshan-Lindblad form with nonnegative coefficients.

    “Theorem 3.1 (Gorini-Kossakowski-Susarshan-Lindblad). An operator L t is the generator of a quantum Markov (or divisible) process if and only if it can be written in the form dρ(t) dt = L t [ρ(t)] = -i[H (t), ρ(t)] + k γ k (t) V k (t)ρ(t)V † k (t) - 1 2 {V † k (t)V k (t), ρ(t)} , (32 ) where H (t) and V k (t) are time-dependent operators, with H (t) self-adjoint, and γ k (t) 0 for every k and time”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. [2]2. U. Weiss, Quantum Dissipative Systems, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000).
  2. [3]3. R. Alicki and K. Lendi, Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1987).
  3. [4]4. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).
  4. [5]5. V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976).
  5. [6]6. G. Lindblad, Comm. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).
  6. [7]7. C.W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noice, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
  7. [8]8. C. W. Lai, P. Maletinsky, A. Badolato, and A. Imamoglu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 167403 (2006).
  8. [9]9. M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998).
  9. [10]10. D. Aharonov, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 050504 (2006).
  10. [11]11. D. Chruściński, A. Kossakowski, and S. Pascazio, Phys. Rev. A 81, 032101 (2010).
  11. [12]12. T. Yu and J. H. Eberly, Opt.Commun. 264, 393 (2006); Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 459 (2007);
  12. [13]13. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 140403 (2006).
  13. [14]14. J. Wilkie, Phys. Rev. E 62, 8808 (2000).
  14. [15]15. J. Wilkie and Yin Mei Wong, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 015006 (2009).
  15. [16]16. A. A. Budini, Phys. Rev. A 69, 042107 (2004).
  16. [17]17. S. Maniscalco, Phys. Rev. A 72, 024103 (2005);
  17. [18]18. S. Maniscalco and F. Petruccione, Phys. Rev. A 73, 012111 (2006);
  18. [19]19. J. Piilo, S. Maniscalco, K. Härkönen and K.-A. Suominen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 180402 (2008)
  19. [21]21. Phys. Rev. E 79, 041147 (2009).
  20. [22]22. S. Daffer, K. Wódkiewicz, J.D. Cresser, and J.K. McIver, Phys. Rev. A 70, 010304 (2004).
  21. [23]23. A. Kossakowski and R. Rebolledo, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 14, 265 (2007); ibid. 15, 135 (2008).
  22. [24]24. A. Kossakowski and R. Rebolledo, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 16, 259 (2009).
  23. [25]25. D. Chruściński and A. Kossakowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070406 (2010).
  24. [26]26. S. Nakajima, Prog. Theor. Phys. 20, 948 (1958);
  25. [27]27. R. Zwanzig, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 1338 (1960).
  26. [28]28. S. Chaturvedi and J. Shibata, Z. Phys. B 35, 297 (1979);
  27. [29]29. N. H. F. Shibata and Y. Takahashi, J. Stat. Phys. 17, 171 (1977).
  28. [30]30. E.B. Davies, Comm. Math. Phys. 39, 91 (1974).
  29. [31]31. E.B. Davies, Quantum Theory of Open Systems, Academic Press, London, 1976.
  30. [32]32. R. Dümcke and H. Spohn, Z. Physik B 34, 419 (1979);
  31. [33]33. R. Dümcke, J. Math. Phys. 24, 311 (1983).
  32. [34]34. P.F. Palmer, J. Math. Phys. 18, 527 (1977).
  33. [36]36. M. M. Wolf and J. I. Cirac, Comm. Math. Phys. 279, 147 (2008);
  34. [37]37. M. M. Wolf, J. Eisert, T. S. Cubitt and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 150402 (2008).
  35. [38]38. H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009).
  36. [39]39. Á. Rivas, S.F. Huelga, and M.B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050403 (2010).
  37. [40]40. P. Haikka, J. D. Cresser, and S. Maniscalco, Phys. Rev. A 83, 012112 (2011)
  38. [41]41. D. Chruściński, Kossakowski and Á. Rivas, Phys. Rev. A 83, 052128 (2011).
  39. [42]42. D. Chruściński and A. Kossakowski, Europhys. Lett. 97, 20005 (2012).
  40. [43]43. S. Szarek, Still more on norms of completely positive maps, in Proceedings of IWOTA 2008, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, Vol. 202, Birkhauser 2009, pp. 535-538.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chruściński, D., & Kossakowski, A.
Affiliations
Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL)
Venue
Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
Published
2012-07-30
Volume
45
Issue
15
Pages
154002
ISSN
  • 0953-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6455
OpenAlex
W1973479161
Cited by
54
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Nicolaus Copernicus University Repository (Nicolaus Copernicus University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Keywords
non-Markovian dynamics, quantum dynamical maps, quantum state distinguishability, fidelity, Kullback-Leibler divergence, open quantum systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review