Crystal fields and microscopic local structures of some trigonal symmetry centres in fluorite crystals doped with trivalent rare-earth ions
Open accessAbstract
Semi-empirical effective charge calculations were made of crystal field effects and the corresponding energy level splittings for NNN-F - compensated centres in a number of RE 3+ : fluorite structure systems. While the results obtained confirm that such centres were indeed observed in a number of experimental investigations of these dopant: lattice systems, in at least one instance (the B centre in the Er 3+ :CaF 2 system) such identification appears to be untenable. Model reconstructions were also made of local lattice distortions in the centres in the Eu 3+ :SrF 2 and Er 3+ :SrF 2 systems. The two centres are structurally related but the corresponding local distortions appear to be qualitatively different, this result is discussed in the context of other recent work in the field. Finally, the procedure developed was used to improve the phenomenological calculation of B q k values for the trigonal entre in the Eu 3+ :BaF 2 system, demonstrating its utility in such applications by significantly improving final fit quality.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The authors use a semi-empirical effective-charge crystal-field model to test whether trigonal centres in rare-earth-doped fluorite crystals correspond to next-nearest-neighbour fluorine-compensated sites. They confirm this assignment for several Eu, Dy, and Er systems, reject it for the B centre in Er:CaF₂, and reconstruct local lattice distortions that differ qualitatively between Eu:SrF₂ and Er:SrF₂ trigonal centres.
Key findings
- For the Eu³⁺:SrF₂ trigonal centre, the model reproduces observed crystal-field splittings of the ⁷F₁, ⁷F₂, and ⁷F₃ manifolds usually to better than 10 cm⁻¹, supporting identification with the NNN-F⁻ compensated centre.
- For Dy³⁺:SrF₂ and Dy³⁺:BaF₂, the model gives reasonable agreement with reported ⁶H₁₅/₂ and ⁶H₁₃/₂ splittings, supporting the assignment of the observed trigonal centres to the same structural type.
- For the B centre in Er³⁺:CaF₂, the model predicts a ⁴I₁₅/₂ splitting of 650 cm⁻¹, whereas the measured B-site splitting is 461 cm⁻¹; the authors conclude that the B centre is not directly related to the NNN-compensated centre.
- Local-distortion reconstructions give Eu³⁺:SrF₂ parameters t₁ = 0.98, t₂ = 0.57, t₃ = 0.97, t₄ = 1.04, t₅ = 0.96, t₆ = 1.04, while the Er³⁺:SrF₂ J centre gives t₄ = 0.96 and t₅ = 1.03, the opposite sense for groups 4 and 5; the authors therefore argue the J centre’s exact structure is qualitatively different and its trigonal symmetry may not be exact.
- Using the modelling procedure to improve starting parameters for the Eu³⁺:BaF₂ trigonal centre reduced the fit deviation from σ = 8.5 cm⁻¹ to σ = 2.4 cm⁻¹.
Methods
- Crystal-field calculations were performed for a C₃ᵥ NNN-F⁻ compensated centre using six non-zero Bₖq parameters; lattice sums were split into a near relaxation region with effective charges and displaced ions, and a remainder treated as fixed-valence fluorite lattice.
- Ligand effective charges and the wave-function expansion parameter were derived from phenomenological cubic-centre Bₖq values; energy-level splittings were computed with intermediate coupling, and J-mixing was included for Eu³⁺.
- Local lattice distortions were reconstructed by grouping 12 relaxing F⁻ ions into six groups with independent relaxation parameters tₘ and fitting to phenomenological Bₖq values; for Eu³⁺:BaF₂, a modified procedure fixed tₘ from Eu³⁺:SrF₂ and varied ligand charge and expansion parameter to improve starting Bₖq values.
Limitations
- The paper states that reconstructed positions of group 2 ions and the interstitial may be physically unrealistic because they are determined mainly from Bₖq values with k = 2, which also receive contributions from ions outside the relaxation region.
- The paper notes that reliable phenomenological Bₖq values are needed before distortion simulation is convincing; Dy³⁺ data were too fragmentary for such a calculation, and independent corroboration of trigonal-centre relaxations is almost absent, with only a comparison to Edgar and Newman’s Gd³⁺:SrF₂ estimate.
- The paper also states that cubic-centre data for Eu³⁺:BaF₂ were insufficient for direct a priori prediction, and that the effective-charge model has clear limitations, illustrated by the cubic centre in Eu³⁺:PbF₂. Evident from the text: the approach is semi-empirical and depends on cubic-centre parameters, some fits show larger deviations (about 30 cm⁻¹ for Er³⁺:SrF₂), and reproduction of B₆ was poor in some distortion fits.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
7 of 33 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisereasoning
The only calculation comparable to the authors' simulation of local lattice distortions in a trigonal centre is the superposition model estimate of lattice relaxation processes in the trigonal centre in the Gd3+:SrF2 system by Edgar and Newman [35].
“The only calculation with which we can compare our results appears to be the superposition model estimate of lattice relaxation processes in the trigonal centre in the Gd3': SrFz system of Edgar and Newman [35]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Edgar and Newman [35] Edgar A, 1975, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
- Interpretationcitation
The results of this study, as well as analogous work on the tetragonal [15,19] and cubic [21] centres in RE3+: fluorite systems, give clear support to the view that a suitably modified electrostatic effective charge model may still be of some use in analysing rare-earth crystal field spectra.
“The results of this study, as well as analogous work on the tetragonal [IS,191 and cubic [Zl] centres in RE^': fluorite systems give clear support to the view that a suitably modified electrostatic effective charge model may still be of some use in analysing rareearth crystal field spectra.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
At least one example, the cubic centre in the Eu3+:PbF2 system [21], clearly illustrates the limitations of the suitably modified electrostatic effective charge model.
“with at least one example (the cubic centre in the Eu3+: PbF, system [21]) clearly illustrating the limitations of such a model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Lesniak K, 1990, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter source
- Findingcitation
At least some of these results are in accord with a superposition model estimate performed by Edgar and Newman [35] for a trigonal centre in the Gd3+:SrF2 system.
“at least some of these results are in accord with a superposition model estimate performed by Edgar and Newman [35] for a trigonal centre in the Gd3': SrF, system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Edgar and Newman [35] Edgar A, 1975, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
- Interpretationreasoning
There is little reason to think that the trigonal centre observed by Jouart et al [31] in the Eu3+:BaF2 system is qualitatively different from the trigonal centre in the Eu3+:SrF2 system whose spectrum was reported in [30].
“There is, on the other hand, little reason to think that the trigonal centre observed by Jouart et al[31] in the Eu3+:BaF2 system is qualitatively different from the trigonal centreintheEu'+:SrF,system whosespectrumwasreportedin [30].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Jouart et al [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [30] Jouart J P, 1985, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
- Findingown data
For the trigonal centre in Eu3+:SrF2, the phenomenological B values obtained reproduce the energy level splitting measured by Jouart et al. with an accuracy corresponding to U = 1.5 cm-1.
“These values reproduce the energy level splitting measured by Jouart et al[30) with an accuracy corresponding to U = 1.5 cm-' (figure 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jouart et al [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
Both groups 2 and 3 had to be included in the relaxation region before reasonably close reproduction of phenomenological B6 could be achieved.
“It is, however, important to underline that both groups 2 and 3 had to be included in the relaxation region before reasonably close reproduction of phenomenological Bg could be achieved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The model procedure led to a reasonably close reproduction of experimentally observed crystal field splittings for trigonal centres in the Dy3+:SrF2 and Dy3+:BaF2 systems.
“Again.we see that the model procedure followed led to a reasonably close reproduction of experimentally observed crystal field splittings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eremin et al [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The procedure developed improves the phenomenological calculation of B values for the trigonal centre in the Eu3+:BaF2 system, significantly improving final fit quality.
“Finally. the procedure developed was used to improve the phenomenological calculation of 8: values for the trigonal Centre i n the Eu'* :BaF, system, demonstrating its utility in such applications by significantly improving final fit quality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The first type of relaxation leads to a radial collapse of the lattice around the dopant, with dopant-ligand distances reduced from 4.746 a0 to 4.42 a0 for the Eu3+:SrF2 system.
“The first type of relaxation leads to a radial collapse ofthelatticearoundthedopant, the dopant-liganddistances beingreducedfrom4.746a. to 4.42 a, for the system of interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the trigonal Eu3+:SrF2 centre, the model-predicted crystal field splittings reproduce the experimentally observed splittings of Jouart et al. very closely, usually with accuracy better than 10 cm-1.
“It is clear that the experimentally observedcrystalfieldsplittingsare reproducedveryclosely, usually withaccuracy better than lOcm-'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jouart et al [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
Using the procedure of section 3 with ionic radii and lattice constant values appropriate to the Eu3+:BaF2 system and the QL, t, z, A values determined previously for the Eu3+:SrF2 system gave B values B2=+178 cm-1, B4=+1550 cm-1, B4=-1830 cm-1, B6=+1360 cm-1, B6=+821 cm-1, B6=+861 cm-1.
“The resulting B: values were: B i = +178cm-'. BA = +1550cm-', B! = -1830cm-', B$ = +1360cm-', B$ = +821 cm-', B$ =~+861 cm-'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In a modified distortion modelling procedure with t values fixed at those previously determined for the trigonal centre in Eu3+:SrF2, the sole minimum found corresponds to QL = -0.724/el and z = 0.724.
“The sole minimum found in this way corresponds to Q L = -0.724/el, z = 0.724.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Comparing these results with the foregoing discussion of the trigonal centre in the Eu3+:SrF2 system, the present simulation produced a picture of local lattice distortions very different from that presented in table 1.
“Comparing these results with those of the foregoing discussion of the trigonal centre in the Ex3+: SrF,system, we see that the present simulation produced a picture of local lattice distortions very different from that presented in table 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors' results agree with Edgar and Newman's assumption that the two axial ligands are equidistant from the dopant.
“our results agree with their assumption that the two axial ligands are equidistant from the dopant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Edgar and Newman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The authors' calculation gives a 1% reduction in the dopant-interstitial separation.
“Our result of a 1% reduction in the dopant-interstitial separation is in accord with this picture”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This value of u = 8.5 cm-1 is significantly larger than the u = 1.5 cm-1 obtained in the analogous calculation for the Eu3+:SrF2 system.
“This value of u is significantly larger than the u = 1.5 cm-' obtained in the analogous calculation for the E d t :SrF2 system”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The crystal field splittings in the trigonal centres in Eu3+:BaF2 and Eu3+:SrF2 systems are very similar.
“Moreover, the crystal field splittings in the trigonal centres in E d + : BaF, and E d t : SrF, systems are very similar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors were able to obtain information about local lattice distortions in several centres of the type considered.
“Furthermore, we were also able to obtain information about local lattice distortions in several centres of the type considered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
This situation is the exact opposite to that found for the trigonal centre in the Eu3+:SrF2 system, where group 5 ions moved towards the RE3+ ion and group 4 ligands moved away.
“This situation is the exact opposite to that found for the trigonal centre in the Eu3+:SrF2 system, where it was group 5 ions that moved towards the RE3+ ion and group 4 ligands that moved away.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The data on the cubic centres in the Eu3+:BaF2 system are, at present, insufficient for phenomenological B4 determination.
“thedataonthecubiccentres in the Eu3+:BaF2 system are, at present, insufficient for phenomenological B$ determination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fitting the splittings in the trigonal centre in the Eu3+:BaF2 system observed by Jouart et al from these starting values resulted in phenomenological B values that reproduce the experimental crystal field splittings with an accuracy corresponding to u = 8.5 cm-1.
“These values reproduce the experimental crystal field splittings with an accuracy corresponding to u = 8.5 cm-' (figure 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jouart et al
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The authors' calculation predicts an increase in the dopant-axial ligand distance by 4%.
“the prediction of our calculation of an increase in the dopant-axial ligand distance by 4%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The a priori calculations of section 2, in which the t values are effectively set equal to 1.00, yielded crystal field splittings close to experimental data.
“This observation helps to explain why the a priori calculations of section 2, in which the I,,, values are, in effect, put equal to 1.00, have yielded crystal field splittings that are so close to experimental data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The t4 and t5 values deduced from sets (I) and (II) are the same.
“Moreover, the t4 and f5 values deduced from sets (I) and (11) are the same.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The results confirm that NNN-F' compensated centres were indeed observed in a number of experimental investigations of RE3+:fluorite systems.
“While the results obtained confirm that such centres were indeed observed in a number of experimental investigationsof these dopant : latticesystems”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous work on the a priori prediction of the spectra of tetragonal symmetry sites in RE3+:fluorite systems provides a model framework for investigating trigonal centres.
“Previous work on the apriori prediction of the spectra of tetragonal symmetry sites in RE'+ :fluorite systems [IS.191 appeared to provide a model framework within which suchaninvestigationcould beconducted”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [IS.191]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The results provide a basis for identifying the emission observed by Eremin et al. in the Dy3+:SrF2 and Dy3+:BaF2 systems as arising from centres of the type shown in figure 1.
“The results thus provide a basis for identifying the emissionobserved by Eremin era1 [32] as arisingfrom centresof the type shown in figure 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eremin et al [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Trigonal symmetry centres associated with F- compensation become progressively more important with increasing host lattice constant and RE3+ dopant mass.
“Moreover, the trigonal symmetry centres associated with Fcompensation were shown in a number of studies [5][6][7][8][9][10] to be progressively more important with increasing host lattice constant and RE^+ dopant mass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5][6][7][8][9][10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The reconstructed local distortions in the Eu3+:SrF2 trigonal centre are superpositions of two types of relaxation: that due to the difference in ionic radii of dopant and lattice cation, and that due to processes associated with introduction of the interstitial.
“In analysing the data in table 1, it should be remembered that the reconstructed distortions are superpositions of two types of relaxation-that due to the difference in theionicradiiofthedopant and thelatticecation,andthatdue to theprocessesassociated with introduction of the interstitial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Model reconstruction of the positions of the group 2 ions and the interstitial may be physically unrealistic.
“The fact that movementsof the ions in group 2 (as well as those of the interstitial) are determined mostly from leads us to expect that model reconstruction of their positions may be physically unrealistic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Lésniak K, 1986, Acta Phys. Polon.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The J site in the Er3+:SrF2 system can be identified with a centre structurally related to the centre shown in figure 1.
“The similarity of the above two energy level schemes is sufficiently close for us to identify the J site with a centre that appears to bc structurally related to the centre shown in figure 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] source
- Interpretationown data
The local lattice arrangement shown in figure 1 is a good description of the lattice environment producing the observed level splittings in the Eu3+:SrF2 trigonal centre.
“Clearly, the local lattice arrangement shown in figure 1 appears to be a good description of the lattice environment producing the observed level splittings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The NNN compensation arrangement of figure 1 provides a reasonably good description of the L site in the Er3+:BaF2 system.
“The agreement between the two energy level schemes appears to be close enough to claim that the NNN compensation arrangement of figure 1 provides a reasonably good description of the L site.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Kurz M D, 1977, J. Lumin.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [17] Aizenberg I B, 1969, Sov. Phys.-Solid State
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The B centre in the Er3+:CaF2 system bears no direct relation, apart from symmetry, to the NNN-F' compensated centre shown in figure 1.
“While the results obtained confirm that such centres were indeed observed in a number of experimental investigationsof these dopant : latticesystems, in at least one instance (the B centre in the Er'+: CaF, system) such identification appears to be untenable.”
- Also stated in: § 3.3. Erbium · plain
“Wearethusled toconcurwiththe authorswhothoughtthat theBsite bearsnodirect relation (apart from symmetry) to the centre shown in figure 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.3. Erbium · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
The unrealistically large movements of the group 2 ions towards the original position of the F ligand on the trigonal axis probably reflect the limited accuracy of determination of their positions.
“The unrealistically large movements of the group 2 ions towards the original position of the Fligand on the trigonal axis probably reflect the limited accuracy of determination of their positions that was underlined in section 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The initial B values do indeed seem to influence the quality of the final fit.
“indicating that the initial B: values do indeed seem to influence the quality of the final fit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A calculation in which B values corresponding to t = 1.00 are used as a starting point in fitting trigonal centre splittings is, at present, impossible for the Eu3+:BaF2 system.
“Thus, a calculation in which B$ valuescorresponding to t, = 1.00 are used as a starting point in fitting trigonal centre splittings is, at present.impossible for the E d + : BaF, system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The above arguments are strong indications that the centre in question is the NNN-compensated centre of figure 1 that was analysed in the previous sections of this paper.
“The above arguments are strong indications that the centre in question is thus theNNN-compensatedcentre of figure 1 that wasanalysedin the previoussections of this paper.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The t4 and t5 values are particularly insensitive to the details of the modelling procedure followed.
“This is particularly significant in the case of ta and t5 values since, as was noted in section 2, these are particularly insensitive to the details of the modelling procedure followed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
In the case of the B centre in the Er3+:CaF2 system, the present procedure clearly indicates that identification with the NNN-compensation arrangements is unwarranted, a view in accord with those of most other investigators.
“The selectivity of such identification may be seen in the case of the B centre in the Er3+:CaF2 system.where the present procedure clearly indicates that such identification is unwarranted, a view in accord with those of most other investigators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The authors' prediction of an increase in the dopant-axial ligand distance by 4% is in clear disagreement with the conclusions of Edgar and Newman.
“the prediction of our calculation of an increase in the dopant-axial ligand distance by 4% is in clear disagreement with the conclusions of Edgar and Newman.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Edgar and Newman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
In accordance with theoretical calculations [7,10] concerning the occurrence of NNN-compensated sites, the centre in question appears to be the dominant one in the Eu3+:BaF2 system.
“Inaccordancewith theoretical calculations [7,10] concerning the occurrence of NNN-COmpenSatedsites, the centre in question appears to be the dominant one in the Eu3+ :BaF2 system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The reported application of the modelling procedure helps to reduce significantly the deviation between calculated and measured crystal field splittings, from u = 8.5 cm-1 to u = 2.4 cm-1, underlining its utility in analysing the spectra of trigonal centres in RE3+: fluorite systems.
“We thussee that the reported application of our modelling procedure helps to reduce significantly the deviation between the calculated and measured crystal field splittings (from U = 8.5 cm-' to U = 2.4 cm-I), underlining its utility in analysing the spectra of trigonal centres in RE^+: fluorite systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
This is the first instance when such a complete reconstruction of these distortions has been made for the centre type of interest.
“Since this is, to our knowledge, the first instance when such a complete reconstruction of these distortions has been made for the centre type of interest”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
- May combine two claims. 11
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEdgar and Newman estimated that, compared with their separations in the cubic centre in the Gd3+:SrF2 system, the group 4 ligands are pushed out by 1%, while the group 5 ions move towards the dopant by 2%.
“In that study, it wasestimated that.comparedwith theirseparationsin thecubiccentrein theGd3+:SrF2 system, the group 4 ligands are pushed out by 1%, while thegroup 5 ions move towards the dopant by 2%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Edgar and Newman [35] Edgar A, 1975, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEdgar and Newman surmise that the dopant moves towards the interstitial by 6.5% of the dopant-ligand separation in the cubic centre, with the two axial ligands moving so as to make their separations from the dopant unchanged.
“Edgar and Newman surmise that the dopant moves towards the interstitial by 6.5% of the dopantligand separation in the cubic centre, with the two axial ligands moving so as to make their separations from the dopant unchanged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Edgar and Newman [35] Edgar A, 1975, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMovements of ions in groups 4 and 5 have impact on all the B values, while movements of the other ions significantly influence only some B values.
“These effects stem from the fact that movements of ions in groups 4 and 5 have impact on all the B$ values, while those of the other ions significantly influence only some Bt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningSimultaneously, the separations between the dopant and the two F-ligands on the trigonal axis increase, with the two ligands ending up equidistant from the dopant at 4.60 a0.
“Simultaneously, the separations between the dopant and the two F-ligands on the trigonal axis increase, with the two ligands ending up as being equidistant from the dopant at 4 .6 0 ~~.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningIn the second type of relaxation, group 4 ligands are pushed away from the interstitial and group 5 ions move closer to it, with final distances from the interstitial of 4.54 a0 and 4.20 a0 respectively.
“In the second type of relaxation.the group 4 ligands are pushed away from the interstitial and the group 5 ions move closer to it; their final distancesfrom the interstitial are thus, respectively, 4.54 aoand 4.20 ao,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe model-predicted overall splitting of the 4I15/2 manifold for a NNN-compensated trigonal centre in Er3+:CaF2 is 650 cm-1, very different from the B site value of 461 cm-1 measured by Tallant and Wright.
“Thus, the overall model-predicted splitting of the 4115/2 manifold (650 cm-') is very different from the corresponding quantity for the B site, as measured by Tallant and Wright [ll], i.e. 461 cm-l.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tallant and Wright [11] Tallant D R, 1975, J. Chem. Phys. source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe W O centres in the Eu3+:SrF2 and Er3+:SrF2 systems are structurally related, but their corresponding local distortions appear to be qualitatively different.
“The W O centres are structurally related but the corresponding local distortions appear to be qualitatively different, this result is discussed in the context ofother recent work in the field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataValues of t4 = 0.96 and t5 = 1.03 found for the J centre correspond to a situation in which group 4 ligands move towards the dopant, while group 5 ions are pushed out.
“Values of l4 = 0.96, f5 = 1.03 found for the J centre correspond to a situation in which group 4 ligands move towards the dopant, while group 5 ions are pushed out.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors' data in table 1 show the group 4 ligands being pushed out by 4% and the group 5 F ions moving towards the dopant by 4%.
“the data in tabIe 1 showing the group 4 ligands being pushed out by 4% and the group 5 Fions moving towards the dopant by 4%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFitting the experimentally measured splittings starting from the second set of initial B values gave phenomenological B values that reproduce the experimental crystal field splittings with an accuracy corresponding to u = 2.4 cm-1.
“These values of crystal field parameters reproduce the experimental crystal field splittings with an accuracy corresponding to u = 2.4 cm-' (figure 71.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIntroduction of the interstitial appears to have a relatively greater impact on lattice relaxation processes in the tetragonal centre in the Eu3+:SrF2 system, while the difference in ionic radii of the dopant and the lattice cation is more significant for the trigonal centre.
“we see that introduction of the interstitial appears to have a relatively greater impact on the lattice relaxation processes in the tetragonal centre in the E$+: SrF, system, while the difference in the ionic radii of the dopant and the lattice cation is more significant for the trigonal centre.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEarly work on the Er3+:CaF2 and Er3+:SrF2 systems appeared to confirm the presence of charge-compensated centres of the NNN-F type, with results consistent with trigonal symmetry about the [111] direction.
“Early work on the Er3+: CaF, [4] and Er'+: SrF, [ 5 ] systems appeared to confirm the presence of charge-compensated centres of this type, the results being consistent with the presence of centres with trigonal symmetry about the [111] direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe tetragonal/trigonal site ratio decreases with increasing dopant concentration in the Er3+:CaF2 system.
“the tetragonal/trigonal (€3) site ratio was shown [12] to decrease with increasing dopant concentration in the Er3+:CaF2 system”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Moore D S, 1981, J. Chem. Phys. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAt least some of the results of the authors' reported simulations agree with conclusions of other investigators.
“It is clear from the above discussion that at least some of the results of our reported simulations agree with conclusions of other investigators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCockroft et al arrived at two sets of phenomenological crystal field parameter values for the centre in question, differing by whether the ground state g-values were included in the fit.
“Cockroft el af arrived at two sets of phenomenological crystal field parameter values; namely: (I) E,$ = +189.0cm-',Bf, = +866.2cmML,E$ = -1434cm-', E$ = +1090cm-', E: = +698.4cm”
- Also stated in: § K LeSniak and F S Richardson 4.2. Trigonal centre in the E#+:SrF,system · plain
“The difference between the two calculations was that the ground state g-values were included in the fit that led to set (11). and were disregarded in calculating (I).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cockroft et al [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § K LeSniak and F S Richardson 4.2. Trigonal centre in the E#+:SrF,system · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe conclusions of section 3 are in clear accord with the traditional view that linked the J site of Kurz and Wright [16] with the NNN-compensated centre in the Er3+:SrF2 system.
“The conclusions of section 3 are in clear accord with the traditional view that linked the J site of Kurz and Wright [16] with the NNN-compensated centre in the Er3+:SrF2 system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kurz and Wright [16] Kurz M D, 1977, J. Lumin.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIt may be that, as concluded by Cockroft et al, the trigonal symmetry of the J centre is not exact.
“It may, in particular, be the c a e that, as was concluded by Cockroft et ai, the trigonal symmetry of the J centre is not exact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cockroft et al
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe authors' reconstruction of movements of the interstitial must be viewed with caution.
“for the reasons outlined in section 2, our reconstruction of movements of the interstitial must be viewed with caution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe modelling procedure outlined in the paper has turned out to be a useful tool for tackling the problems presented in section 1.
“It is clear from the foregoing discussion that the modelling procedure outlined in this paper has indeed turned out to be a useful tool for tackling the problems presented in section 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The ligands move radially towards the dopant from their ideal lattice positions, with the radial displacement determined by requiring the ratio of displaced to ideal dopant-ligand distance to equal the difference in ionic radii of the host lattice cation and the dopant.
“the ligands were assumed to move radially towards the dopant from their ideal lattice positions d ] , ; = (1 -c ) do,;, with the value of c obtained by requiring Id,,;do,;[ to be equal to the difference in the ionic radii of the host lattice cation and the dopant [26].”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The charges of group 1 and group 2 ions depend on their distance from the Eu3+ ion according to equation (4).
“the charges of group 1 and group 2 ions were assumed to be dependent on their distance from the Eu3+ ion according to ( 4).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The rest of the lattice, outside the near-dopant region, is modelled by fixed valence charges of -1 or +2.
“while the rest of the lattice is modelled by fixed valence charges (i.e.Z;is -1 or +2).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the centre identification calculations, non-valence charges are assigned solely to the eight F ligands and the charge-compensating interstitial.
“In the centre identification calculations reported in section 3, non-valence charges were assigned solely to the eight Fligands and the charge-compensating interstitial.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The choice of the starting point of the minimization procedure usually determines the quality and reliability of the final fit in a non-linear multiple-minima fitting problem.
“A well-known difficulty of any non-linear multiple-minima fitting problem is the fact that the choice of the starting point of the minimization procedure usually determines the quality and reliability of the final fit.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Ligand distances are assigned to the wrong reference point
MinorThe text calls 4.54 and 4.20 distances from the interstitial. Table 1 labels those same final values as distances from the dopant to F ions.
“their final distancesfrom the interstitial are thus, respectively, 4.54 aoand 4.20 ao”
“RE'+-F-distance (a") Final value of the relevant Group R, R2 RA relaxation parameter 1 9.492 9.170 9.06 0.98 2 9.087 9.087 6.90 0.57 3 4.746 4.124 4.60 0.97 4 4.146 4.424 4.54 1.04 5 4.746 4.424 4.20 0.96”
Axial ligands have different reported final distances
MinorThe text says both axial ligands finish 4.60 units from the dopant, but Table 1 gives final distances of 4.60 and 4.64 for groups 3 and 6.
“the two ligands ending up as being equidistant from the dopant at 4 .6 0 ~~.”
“RE'+-F-distance (a") Final value of the relevant Group R, R2 RA relaxation parameter 1 9.492 9.170 9.06 0.98 2 9.087 9.087 6.90 0.57 3 4.746 4.124 4.60 0.97 4 4.146 4.424 4.54 1.04 5 4.746 4.424 4.20 0.96 6 4.746 4.424 4.64 1.04”
Cites
Weber, M. J., & Bierig, R. W. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.a1492 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Defect aggregation in anion-excess fluorites. Dopant monomers and dimers
Corish, J., Catlow, C. R. A., Jacobs, P. W. M., & Ong, S. H. (1982) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.25.6425 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Selective laser excitation of charge compensated sites in CaF2:Er3+
Tallant, D. R., & Wright, J. C. (1975) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.431545 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Clustering in rare-earth-doped alkaline earth fluorides (dielectric relaxation)
Andeen, C. G., Fontanella, J. J., Wintersgill, M. C., Welcher, P. J., Kimble, R. J., & Matthews, G. E. (1981) · Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/14/24/012 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Laser spectroscopy of defect chemistry in CaF2:Er3+
Moore, D. S., & Wright, J. C. (1981) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.441303 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The defect properties of anion-excess alkaline-earth fluorides. I. Low defect concentrations
Catlow, C. R. A. (1976) · Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/9/10/005 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Experiments on Er3+ in SrF2. II. Concentration Dependence of Site Symmetry
Brown, M. R., Roots, K. G., Williams, J. M., Shand, W. A., Groter, C., & Kay, H. F. (1969) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1671140 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Charge compensation by interstitial F- ions in rare-earth-doped SrF2 and BaF2
Ranon, U., & Yaniv, A. (1964) · Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)90197-0 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance and Optical Zeeman Spectra of Type II CaF2:Er3+
Rector, C. W., Pandey, B. C., & Moos, H. W. (1966) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1727303 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Lenting, B. P. M., Numan, J. A. J., Bijvank, E. J., & den Hartog, H. W. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.14.1811 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Electronic Shielding of Pr3+ and Tm3+ Ions in Crystals
(1972) · doi:10.1103/physrevb.6.3393 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Edgar, A., & Newman, D. J. (1975) · Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/8/23/016 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Site-selective spectroscopy of hydrogenic sites in CaF2:Er3+ crystals
Cockroft, N. J., Thompson, D., Jones, G. D., & Syme, R. W. G. (1987) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.452304 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Jouart, J. P., Bissieux, C., Mary, G., & Egee, M. (1985) · Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/18/7/019 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Site-selective laser spectroscopy of deuterated SrF2:Er3+
Cockroft, N. J., Jones, G. D., & Syme, R. W. G. (1990) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.458008 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Site-selective laser spectroscopy of BaF2:Eu3+
Jouart, J. P., Bissieux, C., & Mary, G. (1987) · Journal of Luminescence · doi:10.1016/0022-2313(87)90189-x · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Computer modelling of simple point defects in rare-earth-doped alkaline-earth fluorides
Kimble, R. J., Jr., Welcher, P. J., Fontanella, J. J., Wintersgill, M. C., & Andeen, C. G. (1982) · Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/15/16/006 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Dielectric relaxation in defect clusters in calcium fluoride doped with trivalent rare earths
Welsh, H. K. (1985) · Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/18/29/014 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Crystal fields and dopant-ligand separations in cubic centres of rare-earth ions in fluorites
Lesniak, K. (1990) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/2/25/008 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationMiller, M. P., & Wright, J. C. (1978) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.18.3753 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Leśniak, K. (1991) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.460668 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationCalculation of the emission spectrum of Eu^3+ in a tetragonal site in SrF_2
(1988) · doi:10.1364/josab.5.001266 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Grachev V G, 1989, Sov. Phys.-Solid State, 31, 82
- Kurz M D, 1977, J. Lumin., 15, 16 86
- Aizenberg I B, 1969, Sov. Phys.-Solid State, 10, 1595
- Lésniak K, 1986, Acta Phys. Polon., 69, 473
- Eremin M V, 1971, Sov. Phys.-Solid State, 12, 2820
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Lesniak, K., & Richardson, F. S.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Physics (PL)
- Venue
- Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1992-02-17
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1743-1756
- ISSN
- 0953-8984 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-648X
- OpenAlex
- W2030190720
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Physics Condensed Matter (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (8820180)
- National Academy of Sciences
- Division of Chemistry
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nuclear materials and radiation effects
- Keywords
- crystal field effects, rare-earth ions, fluorite, energy level splitting, effective charge, local lattice distortion, model reconstruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review