Cited by 4Luminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallographyNuclear materials and radiation effects

Crystal fields and microscopic local structures of some trigonal symmetry centres in fluorite crystals doped with trivalent rare-earth ions

Open access
Lesniak, K, Richardson, F S·1992·Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter

Abstract

Semi-empirical effective charge calculations were made of crystal field effects and the corresponding energy level splittings for NNN-F - compensated centres in a number of RE 3+ : fluorite structure systems. While the results obtained confirm that such centres were indeed observed in a number of experimental investigations of these dopant: lattice systems, in at least one instance (the B centre in the Er 3+ :CaF 2 system) such identification appears to be untenable. Model reconstructions were also made of local lattice distortions in the centres in the Eu 3+ :SrF 2 and Er 3+ :SrF 2 systems. The two centres are structurally related but the corresponding local distortions appear to be qualitatively different, this result is discussed in the context of other recent work in the field. Finally, the procedure developed was used to improve the phenomenological calculation of B q k values for the trigonal entre in the Eu 3+ :BaF 2 system, demonstrating its utility in such applications by significantly improving final fit quality.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The authors use a semi-empirical effective-charge crystal-field model to test whether trigonal centres in rare-earth-doped fluorite crystals correspond to next-nearest-neighbour fluorine-compensated sites. They confirm this assignment for several Eu, Dy, and Er systems, reject it for the B centre in Er:CaF₂, and reconstruct local lattice distortions that differ qualitatively between Eu:SrF₂ and Er:SrF₂ trigonal centres.

Key findings

  • For the Eu³⁺:SrF₂ trigonal centre, the model reproduces observed crystal-field splittings of the ⁷F₁, ⁷F₂, and ⁷F₃ manifolds usually to better than 10 cm⁻¹, supporting identification with the NNN-F⁻ compensated centre.
  • For Dy³⁺:SrF₂ and Dy³⁺:BaF₂, the model gives reasonable agreement with reported ⁶H₁₅/₂ and ⁶H₁₃/₂ splittings, supporting the assignment of the observed trigonal centres to the same structural type.
  • For the B centre in Er³⁺:CaF₂, the model predicts a ⁴I₁₅/₂ splitting of 650 cm⁻¹, whereas the measured B-site splitting is 461 cm⁻¹; the authors conclude that the B centre is not directly related to the NNN-compensated centre.
  • Local-distortion reconstructions give Eu³⁺:SrF₂ parameters t₁ = 0.98, t₂ = 0.57, t₃ = 0.97, t₄ = 1.04, t₅ = 0.96, t₆ = 1.04, while the Er³⁺:SrF₂ J centre gives t₄ = 0.96 and t₅ = 1.03, the opposite sense for groups 4 and 5; the authors therefore argue the J centre’s exact structure is qualitatively different and its trigonal symmetry may not be exact.
  • Using the modelling procedure to improve starting parameters for the Eu³⁺:BaF₂ trigonal centre reduced the fit deviation from σ = 8.5 cm⁻¹ to σ = 2.4 cm⁻¹.

Methods

  • Crystal-field calculations were performed for a C₃ᵥ NNN-F⁻ compensated centre using six non-zero Bₖq parameters; lattice sums were split into a near relaxation region with effective charges and displaced ions, and a remainder treated as fixed-valence fluorite lattice.
  • Ligand effective charges and the wave-function expansion parameter were derived from phenomenological cubic-centre Bₖq values; energy-level splittings were computed with intermediate coupling, and J-mixing was included for Eu³⁺.
  • Local lattice distortions were reconstructed by grouping 12 relaxing F⁻ ions into six groups with independent relaxation parameters tₘ and fitting to phenomenological Bₖq values; for Eu³⁺:BaF₂, a modified procedure fixed tₘ from Eu³⁺:SrF₂ and varied ligand charge and expansion parameter to improve starting Bₖq values.

Limitations

  • The paper states that reconstructed positions of group 2 ions and the interstitial may be physically unrealistic because they are determined mainly from Bₖq values with k = 2, which also receive contributions from ions outside the relaxation region.
  • The paper notes that reliable phenomenological Bₖq values are needed before distortion simulation is convincing; Dy³⁺ data were too fragmentary for such a calculation, and independent corroboration of trigonal-centre relaxations is almost absent, with only a comparison to Edgar and Newman’s Gd³⁺:SrF₂ estimate.
  • The paper also states that cubic-centre data for Eu³⁺:BaF₂ were insufficient for direct a priori prediction, and that the effective-charge model has clear limitations, illustrated by the cubic centre in Eu³⁺:PbF₂. Evident from the text: the approach is semi-empirical and depends on cubic-centre parameters, some fits show larger deviations (about 30 cm⁻¹ for Er³⁺:SrF₂), and reproduction of B₆ was poor in some distortion fits.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0953-8984/4/7/012

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

7 of 33 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisereasoning

    The only calculation comparable to the authors' simulation of local lattice distortions in a trigonal centre is the superposition model estimate of lattice relaxation processes in the trigonal centre in the Gd3+:SrF2 system by Edgar and Newman [35].

    “The only calculation with which we can compare our results appears to be the superposition model estimate of lattice relaxation processes in the trigonal centre in the Gd3': SrFz system of Edgar and Newman [35]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Edgar and Newman [35] Edgar A, 1975, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The results of this study, as well as analogous work on the tetragonal [15,19] and cubic [21] centres in RE3+: fluorite systems, give clear support to the view that a suitably modified electrostatic effective charge model may still be of some use in analysing rare-earth crystal field spectra.

    “The results of this study, as well as analogous work on the tetragonal [IS,191 and cubic [Zl] centres in RE^': fluorite systems give clear support to the view that a suitably modified electrostatic effective charge model may still be of some use in analysing rareearth crystal field spectra.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] Grachev V G, 1989, Sov. Phys.-Solid State

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [19] source
    • cites [21] Lesniak K, 1990, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter source
  • Interpretationcitation

    At least one example, the cubic centre in the Eu3+:PbF2 system [21], clearly illustrates the limitations of the suitably modified electrostatic effective charge model.

    “with at least one example (the cubic centre in the Eu3+: PbF, system [21]) clearly illustrating the limitations of such a model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Lesniak K, 1990, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter source
  • Findingcitation

    At least some of these results are in accord with a superposition model estimate performed by Edgar and Newman [35] for a trigonal centre in the Gd3+:SrF2 system.

    “at least some of these results are in accord with a superposition model estimate performed by Edgar and Newman [35] for a trigonal centre in the Gd3': SrF, system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Edgar and Newman [35] Edgar A, 1975, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
  • Interpretationreasoning

    There is little reason to think that the trigonal centre observed by Jouart et al [31] in the Eu3+:BaF2 system is qualitatively different from the trigonal centre in the Eu3+:SrF2 system whose spectrum was reported in [30].

    “There is, on the other hand, little reason to think that the trigonal centre observed by Jouart et al[31] in the Eu3+:BaF2 system is qualitatively different from the trigonal centreintheEu'+:SrF,system whosespectrumwasreportedin [30].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jouart et al [31]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [30] Jouart J P, 1985, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Edgar and Newman estimated that, compared with their separations in the cubic centre in the Gd3+:SrF2 system, the group 4 ligands are pushed out by 1%, while the group 5 ions move towards the dopant by 2%.

    “In that study, it wasestimated that.comparedwith theirseparationsin thecubiccentrein theGd3+:SrF2 system, the group 4 ligands are pushed out by 1%, while thegroup 5 ions move towards the dopant by 2%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Edgar and Newman [35] Edgar A, 1975, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Edgar and Newman surmise that the dopant moves towards the interstitial by 6.5% of the dopant-ligand separation in the cubic centre, with the two axial ligands moving so as to make their separations from the dopant unchanged.

    “Edgar and Newman surmise that the dopant moves towards the interstitial by 6.5% of the dopantligand separation in the cubic centre, with the two axial ligands moving so as to make their separations from the dopant unchanged.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Edgar and Newman [35] Edgar A, 1975, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Movements of ions in groups 4 and 5 have impact on all the B values, while movements of the other ions significantly influence only some B values.

    “These effects stem from the fact that movements of ions in groups 4 and 5 have impact on all the B$ values, while those of the other ions significantly influence only some Bt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Simultaneously, the separations between the dopant and the two F-ligands on the trigonal axis increase, with the two ligands ending up equidistant from the dopant at 4.60 a0.

    “Simultaneously, the separations between the dopant and the two F-ligands on the trigonal axis increase, with the two ligands ending up as being equidistant from the dopant at 4 .6 0 ~~.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In the second type of relaxation, group 4 ligands are pushed away from the interstitial and group 5 ions move closer to it, with final distances from the interstitial of 4.54 a0 and 4.20 a0 respectively.

    “In the second type of relaxation.the group 4 ligands are pushed away from the interstitial and the group 5 ions move closer to it; their final distancesfrom the interstitial are thus, respectively, 4.54 aoand 4.20 ao,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The model-predicted overall splitting of the 4I15/2 manifold for a NNN-compensated trigonal centre in Er3+:CaF2 is 650 cm-1, very different from the B site value of 461 cm-1 measured by Tallant and Wright.

    “Thus, the overall model-predicted splitting of the 4115/2 manifold (650 cm-') is very different from the corresponding quantity for the B site, as measured by Tallant and Wright [ll], i.e. 461 cm-l.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tallant and Wright [11] Tallant D R, 1975, J. Chem. Phys. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The W O centres in the Eu3+:SrF2 and Er3+:SrF2 systems are structurally related, but their corresponding local distortions appear to be qualitatively different.

    “The W O centres are structurally related but the corresponding local distortions appear to be qualitatively different, this result is discussed in the context ofother recent work in the field.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Values of t4 = 0.96 and t5 = 1.03 found for the J centre correspond to a situation in which group 4 ligands move towards the dopant, while group 5 ions are pushed out.

    “Values of l4 = 0.96, f5 = 1.03 found for the J centre correspond to a situation in which group 4 ligands move towards the dopant, while group 5 ions are pushed out.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors' data in table 1 show the group 4 ligands being pushed out by 4% and the group 5 F ions moving towards the dopant by 4%.

    “the data in tabIe 1 showing the group 4 ligands being pushed out by 4% and the group 5 Fions moving towards the dopant by 4%”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Fitting the experimentally measured splittings starting from the second set of initial B values gave phenomenological B values that reproduce the experimental crystal field splittings with an accuracy corresponding to u = 2.4 cm-1.

    “These values of crystal field parameters reproduce the experimental crystal field splittings with an accuracy corresponding to u = 2.4 cm-' (figure 71.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Introduction of the interstitial appears to have a relatively greater impact on lattice relaxation processes in the tetragonal centre in the Eu3+:SrF2 system, while the difference in ionic radii of the dopant and the lattice cation is more significant for the trigonal centre.

    “we see that introduction of the interstitial appears to have a relatively greater impact on the lattice relaxation processes in the tetragonal centre in the E$+: SrF, system, while the difference in the ionic radii of the dopant and the lattice cation is more significant for the trigonal centre.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Early work on the Er3+:CaF2 and Er3+:SrF2 systems appeared to confirm the presence of charge-compensated centres of the NNN-F type, with results consistent with trigonal symmetry about the [111] direction.

    “Early work on the Er3+: CaF, [4] and Er'+: SrF, [ 5 ] systems appeared to confirm the presence of charge-compensated centres of this type, the results being consistent with the presence of centres with trigonal symmetry about the [111] direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Rector C W, 1966, J. Chem. Phys. source
    • cites [5] Brown M R, 1969, J. Chem. Phys. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The tetragonal/trigonal site ratio decreases with increasing dopant concentration in the Er3+:CaF2 system.

    “the tetragonal/trigonal (€3) site ratio was shown [12] to decrease with increasing dopant concentration in the Er3+:CaF2 system”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Moore D S, 1981, J. Chem. Phys. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    At least some of the results of the authors' reported simulations agree with conclusions of other investigators.

    “It is clear from the above discussion that at least some of the results of our reported simulations agree with conclusions of other investigators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Cockroft et al arrived at two sets of phenomenological crystal field parameter values for the centre in question, differing by whether the ground state g-values were included in the fit.

    “Cockroft el af arrived at two sets of phenomenological crystal field parameter values; namely: (I) E,$ = +189.0cm-',Bf, = +866.2cmML,E$ = -1434cm-', E$ = +1090cm-', E: = +698.4cm”
    • Also stated in: § K LeSniak and F S Richardson 4.2. Trigonal centre in the E#+:SrF,system · plain
      “The difference between the two calculations was that the ground state g-values were included in the fit that led to set (11). and were disregarded in calculating (I).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cockroft et al [14]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The conclusions of section 3 are in clear accord with the traditional view that linked the J site of Kurz and Wright [16] with the NNN-compensated centre in the Er3+:SrF2 system.

    “The conclusions of section 3 are in clear accord with the traditional view that linked the J site of Kurz and Wright [16] with the NNN-compensated centre in the Er3+:SrF2 system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kurz and Wright [16] Kurz M D, 1977, J. Lumin.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    It may be that, as concluded by Cockroft et al, the trigonal symmetry of the J centre is not exact.

    “It may, in particular, be the c a e that, as was concluded by Cockroft et ai, the trigonal symmetry of the J centre is not exact.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cockroft et al

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The authors' reconstruction of movements of the interstitial must be viewed with caution.

    “for the reasons outlined in section 2, our reconstruction of movements of the interstitial must be viewed with caution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The modelling procedure outlined in the paper has turned out to be a useful tool for tackling the problems presented in section 1.

    “It is clear from the foregoing discussion that the modelling procedure outlined in this paper has indeed turned out to be a useful tool for tackling the problems presented in section 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
19 of 19
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The ligands move radially towards the dopant from their ideal lattice positions, with the radial displacement determined by requiring the ratio of displaced to ideal dopant-ligand distance to equal the difference in ionic radii of the host lattice cation and the dopant.

    “the ligands were assumed to move radially towards the dopant from their ideal lattice positions d ] , ; = (1 -c ) do,;, with the value of c obtained by requiring Id,,;do,;[ to be equal to the difference in the ionic radii of the host lattice cation and the dopant [26].”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The charges of group 1 and group 2 ions depend on their distance from the Eu3+ ion according to equation (4).

    “the charges of group 1 and group 2 ions were assumed to be dependent on their distance from the Eu3+ ion according to ( 4).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The rest of the lattice, outside the near-dopant region, is modelled by fixed valence charges of -1 or +2.

    “while the rest of the lattice is modelled by fixed valence charges (i.e.Z;is -1 or +2).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In the centre identification calculations, non-valence charges are assigned solely to the eight F ligands and the charge-compensating interstitial.

    “In the centre identification calculations reported in section 3, non-valence charges were assigned solely to the eight Fligands and the charge-compensating interstitial.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The choice of the starting point of the minimization procedure usually determines the quality and reliability of the final fit in a non-linear multiple-minima fitting problem.

    “A well-known difficulty of any non-linear multiple-minima fitting problem is the fact that the choice of the starting point of the minimization procedure usually determines the quality and reliability of the final fit.”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Ligand distances are assigned to the wrong reference point

    Minor

    The text calls 4.54 and 4.20 distances from the interstitial. Table 1 labels those same final values as distances from the dopant to F ions.

  • Axial ligands have different reported final distances

    Minor

    The text says both axial ligands finish 4.60 units from the dopant, but Table 1 gives final distances of 4.60 and 4.64 for groups 3 and 6.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Grachev V G, 1989, Sov. Phys.-Solid State, 31, 82
  2. Kurz M D, 1977, J. Lumin., 15, 16 86
  3. Aizenberg I B, 1969, Sov. Phys.-Solid State, 10, 1595
  4. Lésniak K, 1986, Acta Phys. Polon., 69, 473
  5. Eremin M V, 1971, Sov. Phys.-Solid State, 12, 2820

Authors
Lesniak, K., & Richardson, F. S.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics (PL)
Venue
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Published
1992-02-17
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
1743-1756
ISSN
  • 0953-8984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-648X
OpenAlex
W2030190720
Cited by
4
References
25
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (8820180)
  • National Academy of Sciences
  • Division of Chemistry
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nuclear materials and radiation effects
Keywords
crystal field effects, rare-earth ions, fluorite, energy level splitting, effective charge, local lattice distortion, model reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review