Cited by 269High-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 447 of the 447 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Signatures of quark-gluon plasma formation in high energy heavy-ion collisions: a critical review

Open access
Bass, S A, Gyulassy, M, Stöcker, H, Greiner, W·1999·Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics

Abstract

A critical review on signatures of quark-gluon plasma (QGP) formation is given and the current (1998) experimental status is discussed. After giving an introduction to the properties of QCD matter in both, equilibrium and non-equilibrium theories, we focus on observables which may yield experimental evidence for QGP formation. For each individual observable the discussion is divided into three sections: first the connection between the respective observable and QGP formation in terms of the underlying theoretical concepts is given, then the relevant experimental results are reviewed and finally the current status concerning the interpretation of both, theory and experiment, is discussed. A comprehensive summary including an outlook towards RHIC is given in the final section.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0954-3899/25/3/013

Cites

447 of 447 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 442 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Wilkinson D, 1980, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 4
  2. Proceedings of the Workshop on Future Relativistic Heavy Ion Experiments, 1980
  3. Ludlam T W, 1984, Nucl. Phys., 418
  4. Schroeder L S, 1987, Nucl. Phys., 461
  5. Santo R, 1988, Z. Phys., 38
  6. Baym G, 1989, Nucl. Phys., 498
  7. Blaizot J P, 1991, Nucl. Phys., 525
  8. Awes T C, 1992, Nucl. Phys., 544
  9. Stenlund E, 1994, Nucl. Phys., 566
  10. Poskanzer A M, 1995, Nucl. Phys., 590
  11. Braun-Munzinger P, 1996, Nucl. Phys., 610
  12. Hatsuda T, 1998, Nucl. Phys., 638
  13. Bertsch G F, 1983, Nucl. Phys., 400
  14. Gustaffson H A, 1986, Nucl. Phys., 447
  15. 1997, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 23
  16. Schürmann B, 1986, Phys. Rep., 147, 3
  17. Svetitsky B, 1982, Phys. Rev., 29, 963
  18. Xiong L, 1994, Phys. Rev., 49, 2207
  19. Bormann C, 1997, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 23, 1817
  20. The WA97 Collaboration, 1999, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 25
  21. Bleicher M, Phys. Lett.
  22. Hagedorn R, 1965, Suppl. Nuovo Cimento, III, 147
  23. Sorge H, 1995, Phys. Lett., 373
  24. Gyulassy M, Phys. Lett.
  25. Pinkenburg C, Phys. Rev.
  26. Nishimura S, 1998, Nucl. Phys., 638, 549
  27. Sorge H, 1997, Nucl. Phys.
  28. Hanbury Brown R, 1954, Phil. Mag., 45, 633
  29. Pratt S, 1994, Phys. Rev., 49, 2772
  30. Rafelski J, 1982, Phys. Rep., 88, 331
  31. For a review on the Schwinger Particle Production mechanism, 1994
  32. Venables M, 1997, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys., 23, 1857
  33. Sollfrank J, Phys. Rev.
  34. Shuryak E V, 1978, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., 28, 408
  35. Song C, 1994, Phys. Rev., 50, R1872
  36. Murray J, Phys. Rev.
  37. 10.1016/S0375-9474(97)83507-5 · DOI
  38. Jouan D, 1998, Nucl. Phys., 638, 438
  39. 10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00083-5 · DOI
  40. Drapier O, 1994, Nucl. Phys., 544, 209c
  41. With permission from the Annual Review of Nuclear, 1996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–267 of 267

Metadata

Authors
Bass, S. A., Gyulassy, M., Stöcker, H., & Greiner, W.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Venue
Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
R1-R57
ISSN
  • 0954-3899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6471
OpenAlex
W2003831609
Cited by
269
References
442
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
quark-gluon plasma, heavy-ion collisions, QCD matter, RHIC, experimental observables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review