Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What determines the capacity of autoassociative memories in the brain?

Treves, Alessandro, Rolls, Edmund·1991·Network: Computation in Neural Systems

Abstract

Threshold-linear (graded response) units approximate the real firing behaviour of pyramidal neurons in a simplified form, suited to the analytical study of large autoassociative networks. Here we extend previous results on threshold-linear networks to a much larger class of models, by considering different connectivities (including full feedback, highly diluted and multilayer feedforward architectures), different forms of Hebbian learning rules, and different distributions of firing rates (including realistic, continuous distributions of rates). This allows an evaluation of the main factors which may affect, in real cortical networks, the capacity for storage and retrieval of discrete firing patterns.In each case a single equation is derived, which determines both αc, the maximum number of retrievable patterns per synapse, and Im, the maximum amount of retrievable information per synapse. It is shown that: 1. Non-speeific effects, such as those usually ascribed to inhibition, or to neuramodulatary afferents, alter the overall response, but do not affect the capacity for retrieval.2. The crucial parameter which affects αc is a, the sparseness of the neural code. Results previously obtained with binary distributions of rates are shown to hold in general, namely that as a → 0 (sparse coding) αc grows proportionally to (aln(l/a))−1, while Im depends only weakly on a.3. When the coding is sparse, αc and Im become independent of the connectivity, and in particular the relative disadvantages of fully connected feedback networks, which are prominent with non-sparse codes, disappear.4. The precise form of the distribution of rates, and that of the learning rule used, turn out to have rather limited effects on αc and Im. It is to be noted, however, that when non-binary patterns are stored using nonlinear learning rules, such as those possibly modelling the action of NMDA receptors, information distortion occurs in retrieval, and results in a marked decrease of Im. These results may be applied to help understand the organization of a specific network in the hippocampus thought to operate as an autoassociative memory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0954-898x/2/4/004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Treves, A., & Rolls, E.
Venue
Network: Computation in Neural Systems
Published
1991-11-01
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
371-397
ISSN
  • 0954-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6536
OpenAlex
W2086841290
Cited by
357
References
6
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What determines the capacity of autoassociative memories in the brain? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0954-898x/2/4/004
The paper
Treves, A., & Rolls, E. (1991). What determines the capacity of autoassociative memories in the brain? Network: Computation in Neural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-898x/2/4/004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.