Cited by 608Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

A computational theory of hippocampal function, and empirical tests of the theory

Rolls, Edmund T., Kesner, Raymond P.·2006·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

The main aim of the paper is to present an up-to-date computational theory of hippocampal function and the predictions it makes about the different subregions (dentate gyrus, CA3 and CA1), and to examine behavioral and electrophysiological data that address the functions of the hippocampus and particularly its subregions. Based on the computational proposal that the dentate gyrus produces sparse representations by competitive learning and via the mossy fiber pathway forces new representations on the CA3 during learning (encoding), it has been shown behaviorally that the dentate gyrus supports spatial pattern separation during learning. Based on the computational proposal that CA3-CA3 autoassociative networks are important for episodic memory, it has been shown behaviorally that the CA3 supports spatial rapid one-trial learning, learning of arbitrary associations where space is a component, pattern completion, spatial short-term memory, and sequence learning by associations formed between successive items. The concept that the CA1 recodes information from CA3 and sets up associatively learned backprojections to neocortex to allow subsequent retrieval of information to neocortex, is consistent with findings on consolidation. Behaviorally, the CA1 is implicated in processing temporal information as shown by investigations requiring temporal order pattern separation and associations across time; computationally this could involve temporal decay memory, and temporal sequence memor…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.04.005

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolls, E. T., & Kesner, R. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Rolls, Edmund T.
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
1-48
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075949847
Cited by
608
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 43
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH065314)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
hippocampal function, dentate gyrus, CA3, CA1, sparse representation, competitive learning, mossy fiber pathway, pattern separation, pattern completion, episodic memory, autoassociative networks, memory consolidation, temporal sequence memory, intermediate-term memory, perforant path, spatial learning, associative learning
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Computational Biology, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review