The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of cytotoxicity and radiation enhancement using 1.9 nm gold particles: potential application for cancer therapy
Open accessAbstract
High atomic number (Z) materials such as gold preferentially absorb kilovoltage x-rays compared to soft tissue and may be used to achieve local dose enhancement in tumours during treatment with ionizing radiation. Gold nanoparticles have been demonstrated as radiation dose enhancing agents in vivo and in vitro. In the present study, we used multiple endpoints to characterize the cellular cytotoxic response of a range of cell lines to 1.9 nm gold particles and measured dose modifying effects following transient exposure at low concentrations. Gold nanoparticles caused significant levels of cell type specific cytotoxicity, apoptosis and increased oxidative stress. When used as dose modifying agents, dose enhancement factors varied between the cell lines investigated with the highest enhancement being 1.9 in AGO-1522B cells at a nanoparticle concentration of 100 microg ml(-1). This study shows exposure to 1.9 nm gold particles to induce a range of cell line specific responses including decreased clonogenic survival, increased apoptosis and induction of DNA damage which may be mediated through the production of reactive oxygen species. This is the first study involving 1.9 nm nanometre sized particles to report multiple cellular responses which impact on the radiation dose modifying effect. The findings highlight the need for extensive characterization of responses to gold nanoparticles when assessing dose enhancing potential in cancer therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ACTION OF X-RAYS ON MAMMALIAN CELLS
Puck, T. T., & Marcus, P. I. (1956) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.103.5.653 · Cited by 1,696
Cited by
Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements
Her, S., Jaffray, D. A., & Allen, C. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.012 · Cited by 865
Physical basis and biological mechanisms of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization
Butterworth, K. T., McMahon, S. J., Currell, F. J., & Prise, K. M. (2012) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c2nr31227a · Cited by 478
Self-citationBiological consequences of nanoscale energy deposition near irradiated heavy atom nanoparticles
McMahon, S. J., Hyland, W. B., Muir, M. F., Coulter, J. A., Jain, S., Butterworth, K. T., Schettino, G., Dickson, G. R., Hounsell, A. R., O'Sullivan, J. M., et al. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00018 · Cited by 429
Self-citationNanoparticles for Radiation Therapy Enhancement: the Key Parameters
Retif, P., Pinel, S., Toussaint, M., Frochot, C., Chouikrat, R., Bastogne, T., & Barberi-Heyob, M. (2015) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.11642 · Cited by 385
Gold Nanoparticles as Radiosensitizers in Cancer Radiotherapy
Chen, Y., Yang, J., Fu, S., & Wu, J. (2020) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s272902 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Butterworth, K. T., Coulter, J. A., Jain, S., Forker, J., McMahon, S. J., Schettino, G., Prise, K. M., Currell, F. J., & Hirst, D. G.
- Venue
- Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-07-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 295101
- ISSN
- 0957-4484 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6528
- OpenAlex
- W2043389317
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of cytotoxicity and radiation enhancement using 1.9 nm gold particles: potential application for cancer therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0957-4484/21/29/295101
- The paper
- Butterworth, K. T., Coulter, J. A., Jain, S., Forker, J., McMahon, S. J., Schettino, G., Prise, K. M., Currell, F. J., & Hirst, D. G. (2010). Evaluation of cytotoxicity and radiation enhancement using 1.9 nm gold particles: potential application for cancer therapy. Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/29/295101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.