Cited by 147Characterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Facile synthesis of ultrasmall PEGylated iron oxide nanoparticles for dual-contrast T 1 - and T 2 -weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

The development of new types of high-performance nanoparticulate MR contrast agents with either positive (T(1)) or dual-contrast (both positive and negative, T(1) + T(2)) ability is of great importance. Here we report a facile synthesis of ultrasmall PEGylated iron oxide nanoparticles for dual-contrast T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI. The produced superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are of high crystallinity and size uniformity with an average diameter of 5.4 nm, and can be individually dispersed in the physiological buffer with high stability. The SPIONs reveal an impressive saturation magnetization of 94 emu g(-1) Fe(3)O(4), the highest r(1) of 19.7 mM(-1) s(-1) and the lowest r(2)/r(1) ratio of 2.0 at 1.5 T reported so far for PEGylated iron oxide nanoparticles. T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MR images showed that the SPIONs could not only improve surrounding water proton signals in the T(1)-weighted image, but induce significant signal reduction in the T(2)-weighted image. The good contrast effect of the SPIONs as T(1) + T(2) dual-contrast agents might be due to its high magnetization, optimal nanoparticle size for T(1) + T(2) dual-contrast agents, high size monodispersity and excellent colloidal stability. In vitro cell experiments showed that the SPIONs have little effect on HeLa cell viability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0957-4484/22/24/245604

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–147 of 147

Metadata

Authors
Hu, F., Jia, Q., Li, Y., & Gao, M.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
Nanotechnology
Published
2011-04-21
Volume
22
Issue
24
Pages
245604
ISSN
  • 0957-4484 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6528
OpenAlex
W2037035194
Cited by
147
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Beijing Normal University
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Keywords
superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, MRI contrast agents, nanoparticle synthesis, saturation magnetization, colloidal stability
MeSH terms
Cell Survival, Contrast Media, Ferric Compounds, HeLa Cells, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetics, Particle Size, Polyethylene Glycols, X-Ray Diffraction, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Nanotechnology, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review