The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC
Open accessAbstract
The cosmological constant problem is a failure of naturalness and suggests that a fine-tuning mechanism is at work, which may also address the hierarchy problem. An example — supported by Weinberg's successful prediction of the cosmological constant — is the potentially vast landscape of vacua in string theory, where the existence of galaxies and atoms is promoted to a vacuum selection criterion. Then, low energy SUSY becomes unnecessary, and supersymmetry — if present in the fundamental theory — can be broken near the unification scale. All the scalars of the supersymmetric standard model become ultraheavy, except for a single finely tuned Higgs. Yet, the fermions of the supersymmetric standard model can remain light, protected by chiral symmetry, and account for the successful unification of gauge couplings. This framework removes all the difficulties of the SSM: the absence of a light Higgs and sparticles, dimension five proton decay, SUSY flavor and CP problems, and the cosmological gravitino and moduli problems. High-scale SUSY breaking raises the mass of the light Higgs to ~ 120−150 GeV. The gluino is strikingly long lived, and a measurement of its lifetime can determine the ultraheavy scalar mass scale. Measuring the four Yukawa couplings of the Higgs to the gauginos and higgsinos precisely tests for high-scale SUSY. These ideas, if confirmed, will demonstrate that supersymmetry is present but irrelevant for the hierarchy problem — just as it has been irrelevant for the cosmological constant problem — strongly suggesting the existence of a fine-tuning mechanism in nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The large $N$ limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 · Cited by 14,524
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Self-citationHeterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions
Hořava, P., & Witten, E. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00621-4 · Cited by 1,984 · cited 1×
“It is natural to use this extra dimension to lower the higher dimensional Planck scale down to the GUT scale, a la Horava-Witten [48], M5 ∼ MG ∼ 3 × 1016 GeV.”
BackgroundAnthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant
Weinberg, S. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2607 · Cited by 1,166
The statistics of string/M theory vacua
Douglas, M. R. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/046 · Cited by 791
LINDE, A. D. (1986) · Modern Physics Letters A · doi:10.1142/s0217732386000129 · Cited by 319
Diluting the cosmological constant in infinite volume extra dimensions
Dvali, G., Gabadadze, G., & Shifman, M. (2003) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.044020 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO
Degrassi, G., Di Vita, S., Elias-Miró, J., Espinosa, J. R., Giudice, G. F., Isidori, G., & Strumia, A. (2012) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2012)098 · Cited by 1,524
Douglas, M. R., & Kachru, S. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.733 · Cited by 1,122
Four-dimensional string compactifications with D-branes, orientifolds and fluxes
Blumenhagen, R., Körs, B., Lüst, D., & Stieberger, S. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.04.003 · Cited by 890
Dimensionless constants, cosmology, and other dark matters
Tegmark, M., Aguirre, A., Rees, M. J., & Wilczek, F. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.023505 · Cited by 401
Long-lived particles at the energy frontier: the MATHUSLA physics case
Curtin, D., Drewes, M., McCullough, M., Meade, P., Mohapatra, R. N., Shelton, J., Shuve, B., Accomando, E., Alpigiani, C., Antusch, S., et al. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab28d6 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Arkani-Hamed, N., & Dimopoulos, S.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2005-06-28
- Volume
- 2005
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 073-073
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099822476
- Cited by
- 881
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 32.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/06/073
- The paper
- Arkani-Hamed, N., & Dimopoulos, S. (2005). Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/06/073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.