The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But the decay mode provided by the Weak Gravity Conjecture relies on the presence of these fluxes and seems insufficient to guarantee the instability of any non-supersymmetric vacuum.”
From Nothing is certain in string compactifications (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“The WGC is a refinement of the former that quantifies how close we can get to a configuration restoring a global symmetry, and therefore, necessarily constraints the dynamics of the theory.”
From Nothing is certain in string compactifications (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- T. Banks, 2003, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2003, 001, 10.1088/1475-7516/2003/06/001 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.221302 · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90592-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00063-X · DOI
- A. Adams, 2006, J. High Energy Phys., 2006, 014, 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/10/014 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00669-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.086004 · DOI
Cited by
In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D. F., Riess, A. G., & Silk, J. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d · Cited by 2,065
Starting the Universe: stable violation of the null energy condition and non-standard cosmologies
Creminelli, P., Luty, M. A., Nicolis, A., & Senatore, L. (2006) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/12/080 · Cited by 526
Self-citationFencing in the Swampland: quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation
Brown, J., Cottrell, W., Shiu, G., & Soler, P. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)023 · Cited by 232
Montero, M., Uranga, A. M., & Valenzuela, I. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)032 · Cited by 200
Natural inflation and quantum gravity
de la Fuente, A., Saraswat, P., & Sundrum, R. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.151303 · Cited by 156
Euclidean Wormholes, Baby Universes, and Their Impact on Particle Physics and Cosmology
Hebecker, A., Mikhail, T., & Soler, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2018.00035 · Cited by 136
“The swampland conjectures, and in particular the WGC, are expected to hold for all possible p [88].”
BackgroundInfluentialOn axionic field ranges, loopholes and the weak gravity conjecture
Brown, J., Cottrell, W., Shiu, G., & Soler, P. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2016)017 · Cited by 98
Nothing is certain in string compactifications
Etxebarria, I. G., Montero, M., Sousa, K., & Valenzuela, I. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2020)032 · Cited by 87
Can gravitational instantons really constrain axion inflation?
Hebecker, A., Mangat, P., Theisen, S., & Witkowski, L. T. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)097 · Cited by 66
Weak gravity conjecture, multiple point principle and the standard model landscape
Hamada, Y., & Shiu, G. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)043 · Cited by 63
Dibitetto, G., Petri, N., & Schillo, M. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)040 · Cited by 45
Asymptotic Safety: Swampland or Wonderland?
Basile, I., & Platania, A. (2021) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe7100389 · Cited by 39
BPS and near-BPS black holes in $AdS_5$ and their spectrum in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM
Boruch, J., Heydeman, M. T., Iliesiu, L. V., & Turiaci, G. J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.01331 · Cited by 36
Knorr, B., & Platania, A. (2025) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2025)003 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Arkani-Hamed, N., Motl, L., Nicolis, A., & Vafa, C.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2007-06-15
- Volume
- 2007
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 060-060
- ISSN
- 1029-8479
- Cited by
- 1,052
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
