Cited by 17Plasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsVacuum and Plasma ArcsMagnetic confinement fusion research

Parametric study of the radial plasma-wall interaction in a Hall thruster

Open access
Domínguez-Vázquez, A, Taccogna, F, Fajardo, P, Ahedo, E·2019·Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics

Abstract

An investigation on the influence of relevant parameters on an annular Hall effect thruster plasma discharge is performed using a radial particle-in-cell simulation code with secondary electron emission from the walls and prescribed axial electric and radial magnetic fields. A simulation with true-secondary electrons only is taken as reference. First, the near-wall conductivity effects on the magnetized secondary electrons are illustrated by doubling the , allowing a further code validation. Second, when secondary backscattered electrons are included, the enhanced secondary emission yields lower sheath potential drops and primary electron temperature. Moreover, the dominant backscattered electrons increase the average secondary electrons emission energy, greatly affecting its temperature anisotropy ratio and increasing the replenishment level of the wall collectable tails of the primary electrons velocity distribution function. Third, the effect of the true-secondary electrons emission energy on the potential profile is shown to be negligible, the latter being mainly set by the dominant magnetic mirror effect. Finally, a planar case featuring symmetric plasma profiles permits to confirm the validity of the large cylindrical asymmetries present in the reference case, induced by the combined effects of the geometric expansion, the magnetic mirror and the centrifugal force (due to the drift). A smaller deviation of the primary electron momentum equation from the Boltzmann relation along the magnetic lines is still found in the planar case, induced by the parallel temperature non-uniformity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6463/ab3c7b

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hybrid models feature a kinetic treatment of the ion species (and in some cases of the neutrals as well) so that CEX collisions are correctly captured, and a fluid modeling of the fastest species, the electrons.

    “In fact, they feature a kinetic treatment of the ion species (and in some cases of the neutrals as well) so that CEX collisions are correctly captured, and a fluid modeling of the fastest species, the electrons, which are subject to conservation equations.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [225]

    Section 2, “The radial model” (page unavailable), describes a PIC model in which both ions and electrons are macroparticles; it does not describe hybrid models with fluid electrons. Searches for hybrid modeling and CEX collisions found no passage addressing the attributed description. The conservation equation shown there applies to both ions and electrons and does not establish fluid treatment of electrons. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hybrid models represent the best compromise in terms of accuracy and computational cost for modeling plasma thruster plume expansion and its interaction with the spacecraft.

    “Hybrid models 225-234 have therefore emerged in this context, as they represent the best compromise in terms of accuracy and computational cost for modeling the plasma thruster plume expansion and its interaction with the spacecraft.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [225]

    The Introduction and section 2 describe a radial PIC/MCC model of plasma interaction with Hall-thruster walls, not hybrid modeling of plume expansion or spacecraft interaction. Searches for hybrid models, plume expansion, spacecraft interaction, and an accuracy–computational-cost comparison found no passage addressing the attributed claim; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Ahedo E 2011 Plasmas for space propulsion Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 124037 · DOI
  2. Jahn R G 1968 Physics of Electric Propulsion (New York: McGraw-Hill)
  3. Martínez-Sánchez M and Pollard J E 1998 Spacecraft electric propulsion-an overview J. Propulsion Power 14 688-99 · DOI
  4. Boeuf J P 2017 Tutorial: physics and modeling of Hall thrusters J. Appl. Phys. 121 011101 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Sydorenko D, Smolyakov A, Kaganovich I and Raitses Y 2006 Kinetic simulation of secondary electron emission effects in Hall thrusters Phys. Plasmas 13 014501 · DOI
  6. Sydorenko D, Smolyakov A, Kaganovich I and Raitses Y 2006 Modification of electron velocity distribution in bounded plasmas by secondary electron emission IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 34 815-24 · DOI
  7. Ahedo E and Parra F I 2005 Partial trapping of secondary electron emission in a Hall thruster plasma Phys. Plasmas 12 073503 · DOI
  8. Domínguez-Vázquez A, Taccogna F and Ahedo E 2018 Particle modeling of radial electron dynamics in a controlled discharge on a Hall thruster Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 27 064006 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Taccogna F, Longo S, Capitelli M and Schneider R 2007 Particle-in-cell simulation of stationary plasma thruster Contrib. Plasma Phys. 47 635-56 · DOI
  10. Taccogna F, Schneider R, Longo S and Capitelli M 2008 Kinetic simulations of a plasma thruster Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 17 024003 · DOI
  11. Ahedo E, Gallardo J M and Martínez-Sánchez M 2003 Effects of the radial-plasma wall interaction on the axial Hall thruster discharge Phys. Plasmas 10 3397-409 · DOI
  12. Verboncoeur J P 2001 Symmetric spline weighting for charge and current density in particle simulation J. Comput. Phys. 174 421-7 · DOI
  13. Furman M A and Pivi M T F 2002 Probabilistic model for the simulation of secondary electron emission Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 5 124404 · DOI
  14. Ahedo E and Pablo V D 2007 Combined effects of electron partial thermalization and secondary emission in Hall thruster discharges Phys. Plasmas 14 083501 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domínguez-Vázquez, A., Taccogna, F., Fajardo, P., & Ahedo, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
  • Institute for the Science and Technology of Plasmas (IT)
Corresponding author
Domínguez-Vázquez, A
Venue
Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
Published
2019-09-09
Volume
52
Issue
47
Pages
474003
ISSN
  • 0022-3727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6463
OpenAlex
W2969553943
Cited by
17
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics D Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (ARS01_00141)
  • Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (ESP2016-75887)
  • Comunidad de Madrid (Y2018/NMT-4750)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
Hall thruster, secondary electron emission, backscattered electrons, electron temperature anisotropy, magnetic mirror effect, centrifugal force, radial magnetic field, particle-in-cell simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review