Cited by 13Advanced Radiotherapy TechniquesRadiation Dose and ImagingRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Quality assurance for the use of computational methods in dosimetry: activities of EURADOS Working Group 6 ‘Computational Dosimetry’

Open access
Rabus, H, Gómez-Ros, J M, Villagrasa, C, Eakins, J, Vrba, T, Blideanu, V, Zankl, M, Tanner, R +7 more·2021·Journal of Radiological Protection

Abstract

Working Group (WG) 6 ‘Computational Dosimetry’ of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group promotes good practice in the application of computational methods for radiation dosimetry in radiation protection and the medical use of ionising radiation. Its cross-sectional activities within the association cover a large range of current topics in radiation dosimetry, including more fundamental studies of radiation effects in complex systems. In addition, WG 6 also performs scientific research and development as well as knowledge transfer activities, such as training courses. Monte Carlo techniques, including the use of anthropomorphic and other numerical phantoms based on voxelised geometrical models, play a strong part in the activities pursued in WG 6. However, other aspects and techniques, such as neutron spectra unfolding, have an important role as well. A number of intercomparison exercises have been carried out in the past to provide information on the accuracy with which computational methods are applied and whether best practice is being followed. Within the exercises that are still ongoing, the focus has changed towards assessing the uncertainty that can be achieved with these computational methods. Furthermore, the future strategy of WG 6 also includes an extension of the scope toward experimental benchmark activities and evaluation of cross-sections and algorithms, with the vision of establishing a gold standard for Monte Carlo methods used in medical and radiobiological applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6498/abd914

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rabus, H., Gómez-Ros, J. M., Villagrasa, C., Eakins, J., Vrba, T., Blideanu, V, Zankl, M., Tanner, R., Struelens, L., Brkić, H., Domingo, C., Baiocco, G., Caccia, B., Huet, C., & Ferrari, P.
Affiliations
  • Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
  • Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (ES)
  • Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (FR)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (BE)
  • University of Osijek (HR)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT)
Corresponding author
Rabus, H
Venue
Journal of Radiological Protection
Published
2021-02-26
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
46-58
ISSN
  • 0952-4746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6498
OpenAlex
W3119407404
Cited by
13
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Radiological Protection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
computational dosimetry, quality assurance, Monte Carlo dosimetry, numerical phantoms, anthropomorphic phantom, intercomparison exercise, uncertainty analysis, benchmarking, radiation protection dosimetry, cross sections
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Monte Carlo Method, Neutrons, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Protection, Radiometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review