Cited by 19Radiation Dose and ImagingAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesRadioactivity and Radon Measurements

The work programme of EURADOS on internal and external dosimetry

Open access
Rühm, W., Bottollier-Depois, J.F., Gilvin, P., Harrison, R., Knežević, Ž., Lopez, M.A., Tanner, R., Vargas, A. +1 more·2018·Annals of the ICRP

Abstract

Since the early 1980s, the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) has been maintaining a network of institutions interested in the dosimetry of ionising radiation. As of 2017, this network includes more than 70 institutions (research centres, dosimetry services, university institutes, etc.), and the EURADOS database lists more than 500 scientists who contribute to the EURADOS mission, which is to promote research and technical development in dosimetry and its implementation into practice, and to contribute to harmonisation of dosimetry in Europe and its conformance with international practices. The EURADOS working programme is organised into eight working groups dealing with environmental, computational, internal, and retrospective dosimetry; dosimetry in medical imaging; dosimetry in radiotherapy; dosimetry in high-energy radiation fields; and harmonisation of individual monitoring. Results are published as freely available EURADOS reports and in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Moreover, EURADOS organises winter schools and training courses on various aspects relevant for radiation dosimetry, and formulates the strategic research needs in dosimetry important for Europe. This paper gives an overview on the most important EURADOS activities. More details can be found at www.eurados.org .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146645318756224

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rühm, W., Bottollier-Depois, J. F., Gilvin, P., Harrison, R., Knežević, Ž., Lopez, M. A., Tanner, R., Vargas, A., & Woda, C.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (FR)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Ruđer Bošković Institute (HR)
  • Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (ES)
  • Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Corresponding author
Rühm, W.
Venue
Annals of the ICRP
Published
2018-04-17
Volume
47
Issue
3-4
Pages
20-34
ISSN
  • 0146-6453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-969X
OpenAlex
W2800138005
Cited by
19
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the ICRP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
Keywords
EURADOS, radiation dosimetry, internal dosimetry, external dosimetry, personal radiation monitoring, retrospective dosimetry, environmental dosimetry, computational dosimetry, radiotherapy dosimetry
MeSH terms
Radiation Exposure, Humans, International Agencies, Radiation Protection, Radiation, Ionizing, Radiometry, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review