The DOI matches its Crossref record; 138 of the 138 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity
Open accessAbstract
The detection of gravitational waves from binary black-hole mergers by the LIGO–Virgo Collaboration marks the dawn of an era when general-relativistic dynamics in its most extreme manifestation is directly accessible to observation. In the future, planned (space-based) observatories operating in the millihertz band will detect the intricate gravitational-wave signals from the inspiral of compact objects into massive black holes residing in galactic centers. Such inspiral events are extremely effective probes of black-hole geometries, offering unparalleled precision tests of general relativity in its most extreme regime. This prospect has in the past two decades motivated a programme to obtain an accurate theoretical model of the strong-field radiative dynamics in a two-body system with a small mass ratio. The problem naturally lends itself to a perturbative treatment based on a systematic expansion of the field equations in the small mass ratio. At leading order one has a pointlike particle moving in a geodesic orbit around the large black hole. At subsequent orders, interaction of the particle with its own gravitational perturbation gives rise to an effective ‘self-force’, which drives the radiative evolution of the orbit, and whose effects can be accounted for order by order in the mass ratio. This review surveys the theory of gravitational self-force in curved spacetime and its application to the astrophysical inspiral problem. We first lay the relevant formal foundation, describing the rigorous derivation of the equation of self-forced motion using matched asymptotic expansions and other ideas. We then review the progress that has been achieved in numerically calculating the self-force and its physical effects in astrophysically realistic inspiral scenarios. We highlight the way in which, nowadays, self-force calculations make a fruitful contact with other approaches to the two-body problem and help inform an accurate universal model of binary black hole inspirals, valid across all mass ratios. We conclude with a summary of the state of the art, open problems and prospects. Our review is aimed at non-specialist readers and is for the most part self-contained and non-technical; only elementary-level acquaintance with general relativity is assumed. Where useful, we draw on analogies with familiar concepts from Newtonian gravity or classical electrodynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 · Cited by 14,151
The Classical Theory of Fields
(1975) · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-14608-1 · Cited by 4,725
GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.241103 · Cited by 3,435
The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes
Chandrasekhar, S. (1984) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-6469-3_2 · Cited by 3,165
Stability of a Schwarzschild Singularity
Regge, T., & Wheeler, J. A. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1063 · Cited by 2,725
Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Gravitational Fields
Carter, B. (1968) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.174.1559 · Cited by 2,288
The Classical Theory of Fields
Landau, L. D., Lifshitz, E. M., & Holbrow, C. H. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050989 · Cited by 2,153
Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system
Hulse, R. A., & Taylor, J. H. (1975) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/181708 · Cited by 1,924
Classical theory of radiating electrons
Dirac, P. A. M. (1938) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1938.0124 · Cited by 1,595
Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics
Buonanno, A., & Damour, T. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.084006 · Cited by 1,311
Cited by
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
Bern, Z., Cheung, C., Roiban, R., Shen, C.-H., Solon, M. P., & Zeng, M. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.201603 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Barack, L., & Pound, A.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-11-28
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 016904
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2804540685
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 138
- FWCI
- 18.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1361-6633/aae552
- The paper
- Barack, L., & Pound, A. (2019). Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aae552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.