The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beating the standard quantum limit: phase super-sensitivity of N-photon interferometers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Discrimination of Bell states with linear optics and no ancillary modes is bound to a 50% discrimination success rate.
“For example, if we use exclusively linear optics and no other ancillary modes, we are bound to a 50% discrimination success rate [72].”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state
Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S., & Steinberg, A. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02493 · Cited by 830
Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation
Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06257 · Cited by 628
De Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state
Walther, P., Pan, J.-W., Aspelmeyer, M., Ursin, R., Gasparoni, S., & Zeilinger, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02552 · Cited by 555
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.010401 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.23.1693 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4033 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1104149 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.2957 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1348 · DOI · Paper page
- Kuzmich A, 1998, Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 10, 493, 10.1088/1355-5111/10/3/008 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2868 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.213601 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.090502 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.033812 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1138007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.223601 · DOI
- Barford N C, 1985, Experimental Measurements: Precision, Error, and Truth
- Cramér H, 1946, Mathematical Methods of Statistics
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.223602 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033820 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.123482 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.123404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R4649 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature04251 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894
O'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.229 · Cited by 2,388
Self-citationManipulation of multiphoton entanglement in waveguide quantum circuits
Matthews, J. C. F., Politi, A., Stefanov, A., & O'Brien, J. L. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.93 · Cited by 410
Self-citationTwo-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Politi, A., Matthews, J., Thompson, M. G., & O'Brien, J. L. (2009) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2009.2026060 · Cited by 196
Self-citationGallium arsenide (GaAs) quantum photonic waveguide circuits
Wang, J., Santamato, A., Jiang, P., Bonneau, D., Engin, E., Silverstone, J. W., Lermer, M., Beetz, J., Kamp, M., Höfling, S., et al. (2014) · Optics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2014.02.040 · Cited by 134
Self-citationHeralding Two-Photon and Four-Photon Path Entanglement on a Chip
Matthews, J. C. F., Politi, A., Bonneau, D., & O’Brien, J. L. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.163602 · Cited by 94
Self-citationControl-enhanced sequential scheme for general quantum parameter estimation at the Heisenberg limit
Hou, Z., Wang, R.-J., Tang, J.-F., Yuan, H., Xiang, G.-Y., Li, C.-F., & Guo, G.-C. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.040501 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Okamoto, R., Hofmann, H. F., Nagata, T., O'Brien, J. L., Sasaki, K., & Takeuchi, S.
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-07-18
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 073033
- ISSN
- 1367-2630
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
