CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 845

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The SECOQC quantum key distribution network in Vienna

Peev, M, Pacher, C, Alléaume, R, Barreiro, C, Bouda, J, Boxleitner, W, Debuisschert, T, Diamanti, E, Dianati, M, Dynes, J F, Fasel, S, Fossier, S, Fürst, M, Gautier, J-D, Gay, O, Gisin, N, Grangier, P, Happe, A, Hasani, Y, Hentschel, M, Hübel, H, Humer, G, Länger, T, Legré, M, Lieger, R, Lodewyck, J, Lorünser, T, Lütkenhaus, N, Marhold, A, Matyus, T, Maurhart, O, Monat, L, Nauerth, S, Page, J-B, Poppe, A, Querasser, E, Ribordy, G, Robyr, S, Salvail, L, Sharpe, A W, Shields, A J, Stucki, D, Suda, M, Tamas, C, Themel, T, Thew, R T, Thoma, Y, Treiber, A, Trinkler, P, Tualle-Brouri, R, Vannel, F, Walenta, N, Weier, H, Weinfurter, H, Wimberger, I, Yuan, Z L, Zbinden, H, Zeilinger, A·2009·New Journal of Physics
DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Achieving a never-failing Bell measurement is impossible using only linear-optical elements such as beam splitters, phase shifters, detectors and ancillary particles.

    “One challenge for implementing dense conding is represented by the BM stage, since achieving a never-failing BM is impossible using only linearoptical elements such as beam splitters, phase shifters, detectors and ancillary particles [323].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [323]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Bennett C Brassard G, 1984, Conf. on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing (Bangalore, India), 175
  2. 10.1007/BF00191318 · DOI
  3. 10.1364/OE.15.008465 · DOI
  4. 10.1049/iet-opt:20070091 · DOI
  5. 10.1063/1.2126792 · DOI
  6. 10.1063/1.2815916 · DOI
  7. 10.1364/OE.15.007853 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.050303 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.030503 · DOI
  10. Fossier S, 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 045023, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045023 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/prop.200610322 · DOI
  12. Duligall J, 2006, New J. Phys., 8, 249, 10.1088/1367-2630/8/10/249 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.2651 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/385047a0 · DOI
  15. 10.1006/ofte.1998.0270 · DOI
  16. Elliott C, 2002, New J. Phys., 4, 46, 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/346 · DOI
  17. Elliott C, 2005, Quantum Information and Computation III (Proc. SPIE), 5815, 138, 10.1117/12.606489 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/sec.13 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.169 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Stucki D, 2002, New J. Phys., 4, 41, 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/341 · DOI
  21. 10.1063/1.118224 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.057901 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042316 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032301 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1080/09500340410001730986 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022313 · DOI
  27. Makarov V, 2008, Quantum Inf. Comput., 8, 622, 10.26421/QIC8.6-7-4 · DOI
  28. Qi B, 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 73, 10.26421/QIC7.1-2-3 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 · DOI
  30. 10.1049/el:20045038 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.042306 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s00145-004-0142-y · DOI
  33. Branciard C, 2008, New J. Phys., 10, 013031, 10.1088/1367-2630/10/1/013031 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230503 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230504 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.557 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/TIT.2003.822618 · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042305 · DOI
  39. Gottesman D, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 325, 10.26421/QIC4.5-1 · DOI
  40. Brassard G, 1993, Advances in Cryptology: Eurocrypt '93 (Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.), 765, 410
  41. 10.1109/TIT.1956.1056816 · DOI
  42. 10.4153/CJM-1956-045-5 · DOI
  43. Chekuri C S, 1997, SODA '97: Proc. Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, 324
  44. 10.1145/290179.290181 · DOI
  45. 10.1287/moor.24.2.383 · DOI
  46. 10.1063/1.2760135 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peev, M., Pacher, C., Alléaume, R., Barreiro, C., Bouda, J., Boxleitner, W., Debuisschert, T., Diamanti, E., Dianati, M., Dynes, J. F., Fasel, S., Fossier, S., Fürst, M., Gautier, J.-D., Gay, O., Gisin, N., Grangier, P., Happe, A., Hasani, Y., Hentschel, M., Hübel, H., Humer, G., Länger, T., Legré, M., Lieger, R., Lodewyck, J., Lorünser, T., Lütkenhaus, N., Marhold, A., Matyus, T., Maurhart, O., Monat, L., Nauerth, S., Page, J.-B., Poppe, A., Querasser, E., Ribordy, G., Robyr, S., Salvail, L., Sharpe, A. W., Shields, A. J., Stucki, D., Suda, M., Tamas, C., Themel, T., Thew, R. T., Thoma, Y., Treiber, A., Trinkler, P., Tualle-Brouri, R., Vannel, F., Walenta, N., Weier, H., Weinfurter, H., Wimberger, I., Yuan, Z. L., Zbinden, H., & Zeilinger, A.
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2009-07-02
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
075001
ISSN
1367-2630
DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075001
Cited by
845
References
3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review