CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 721

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum repeaters based on entanglement purification

Dür, W., Briegel, H.-J., Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P.·1999·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.59.169
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.59.169

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A generic (isotropic) noise model, by mixing the initially pure state with a maximally mixed state, is a common way to simulate real-world noisy conditions and covers a wide range of random noise sources.

    “A common way to simulate real-world noisy conditions is to use a generic (isotropic) noise model, by mixing the initially pure state with a maximally mixed state49, covering a wide range of random noise sources e.g., from the source (multi-photon events), the channel (background and lost photons), and the detector (dark counts).”

    From Topological rejection of noise by quantum skyrmions (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

  • Starting from 2012, alternative all-photonic schemes without quantum memories were presented by Munro et al. and by Azuma et al. based on multi-photon cluster-states, loss-tolerant measurements and local high-speed active feedforward controls.

    “However, starting from 2012, alternative all-photonic schemes without quantum memories were presented by Munro et al. [417] and by Azuma et al. [422,423] based on multi-photon cluster-states, loss-tolerant measurements and local high-speed active feedforward controls.”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [417]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. B. Schumacher, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 54, 2614, 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.2614 · DOI
  2. B. Schumacher, 1997, Phys. Rev. A, 131, 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.131 · DOI
  3. D. Dieks, 1982, Phys. Lett., 92A, 271, 10.1016/0375-9601(82)90084-6 · DOI · Paper page
  4. R. J. Glauber, 1986, Frontiers in Quantum Optics
  5. A. M. Steane, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 2252, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2252 · DOI
  6. C. H. Bennett, 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 722, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722 · DOI · Paper page
  7. C. H. Bennett, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 54, 3824, 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824 · DOI · Paper page
  8. D. Deutsch, 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 2818, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2818 · DOI · Paper page
  9. C. Miquel, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3971, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3971 · DOI
  10. A. Zeilinger, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3031, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3031 · DOI · Paper page
  11. S. J. van Enk, 1998, Science, 279, 205, 10.1126/science.279.5348.205 · DOI
  12. S. J. van Enk, 1997, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 4293, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4293 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dür, W., Briegel, H.-J., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
169-181
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.59.169
Cited by
721
References
4
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review