Cited by 44Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Correcting detection errors in quantum state engineering through data processing

Open access
Shen, C, Duan, L-M·2012·New Journal of Physics

Abstract

Verifying correlations within a quantum state is an important task in quantum state engineering, while realistic detectors with imperfect efficiency usually introduce errors into the detection results. With these detection errors, genuine multi-partite entanglement can be invisible. In this paper, we propose a simple method for correcting arbitrary uncorrelated detection errors. The method is based on the processing of data from repetitive experiments and can correct detection errors of any magnitude as long as the error magnitude is calibrated. The method is illustrated with its application in the detection of multi-partite entanglement from quantum state engineering.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053053

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • State preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors are characterized and corrected by applying the inverse of an independently measured state-to-state error matrix.

    “State preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors are characterized and corrected by applying the inverse of an independently measured state-to-state error matrix63.”

    From Quantum walks and Dirac cellular automata on a programmable trapped-ion quantum computer (2020) · cites this paper as [63]

    Section 2.1 describes calibrating a detection-error matrix in a prior experiment and inverting it to recover the true outcome distribution. The Introduction and Conclusion describe this as correction of detector errors; our copy does not establish that the method also characterizes or corrects state-preparation errors, as the term SPAM implies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, C., & Duan, L.-M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, C
ORCID
Shen, C
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2012-05-31
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
053053
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162451888
Cited by
43
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Bulletin of the American Physical Society
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2011C-BA00302, 2011CBA00300)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
detection error, quantum state engineering, genuine multipartite entanglement, error correction, data processing, entanglement detection, error calibration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review