Cited by 197Laser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesLaser Material Processing Techniques

Intense 1.5-cycle near infrared laser waveforms and their use for the generation of ultra-broadband soft-x-ray harmonic continua

Open access
Cavalieri, A L, Goulielmakis, E, Horvath, B, Helml, W, Schultze, M, Fieß, M, Pervak, V, Veisz, L, Yakovlev, V S, Uiberacker, M, Apolonski, A, Krausz, F, Kienberger, R·2007·New Journal of Physics

Abstract

We demonstrate sub-millijoule-energy, sub-4 fs-duration near-infrared laser pulses with a controlled waveform comprised of approximately 1.5 optical cycles within the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of their temporal intensity profile. We further demonstrate the utility of these pulses for producing high-order harmonic continua of unprecedented bandwidth at photon energies around 100 eV. Ultra-broadband coherent continua extending from 90 eV to more than 130 eV with smooth spectral intensity distributions that exhibit dramatic, never-before-observed sensitivity to the carrier-envelope offset (CEO) phase of the driver laser pulse were generated. These results suggest the feasibility of sub-100-attosecond XUV pulse generation for attosecond spectroscopy in the 100 eV range, and of a simple yet highly sensitive on-line CEO phase detector with sub-50-ms response time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/9/7/242

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavalieri, A. L., Goulielmakis, E., Horvath, B., Helml, W., Schultze, M., Fieß, M., Pervak, V, Veisz, L., Yakovlev, V. S., Uiberacker, M., Apolonski, A., Krausz, F., & Kienberger, R.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Horvath, B
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2007-07-31
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
242-242
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076180515
Cited by
197
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
15.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Laserlab-Europe
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
Keywords
near-infrared pulses, high harmonic generation, attosecond spectroscopy, few-cycle pulses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review