Cited by 24Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAdvanced Differential Geometry Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

How fabulous is Fab 5 cosmology?

Open access
Linder, Eric V·2013·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

Extended gravity origins for cosmic acceleration can solve some fine tuning issues and have useful characteristics, but generally have little to say regarding the cosmological constant problem. Fab 5 gravity can be ghost free and stable, have attractor solutions in the past and future, and possess self tuning that solves the original cosmological constant problem. Here we show however it does not possess all these qualities at the same time. We also demonstrate that the self tuning is so powerful that it not only cancels the cosmological constant but also all other energy density, and we derive the scalings of its approach to a renormalized de Sitter cosmology. While this strong cancellation is bad for the late universe, it greatly eases early universe inflation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Appleby et al. (2012) and Linder (2013) argued that Fab Four models fail to provide viable cosmic evolution for whole cosmic history.

    “However, it was argued in Appleby et al. (2012) and Linder (2013) that such models fail to provide a viable cosmic evolution for the whole cosmic history.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Linder 2013

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 24

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00603-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4438 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.023511 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2007.05.011 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.064036 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.084003 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.064015 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.051101 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.104040 · DOI
  10. E.J. Copeland, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 026, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/026 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.07.066 · DOI
  12. S.A. Appleby, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 043, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/043 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF01807638 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.11.028 · DOI
  15. S.A. Appleby, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 060, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/10/060 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1007/JHEP04(2013)032 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3641 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0370-2693(93)90685-B · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.01.005 · DOI
  20. J. Noller, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 013, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/013 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.241102 · DOI
  22. P. Brax, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 016, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/10/016 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.083010 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.083518 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.103505 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.011302 · DOI
  27. 10.1155/2012/430694 · DOI
  28. R. Kimura, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 050, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/050 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.043503 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Linder, E. V.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Linder, Eric V
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2013-12-13
Volume
2013
Issue
12
Pages
032-032
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W1970505622
Cited by
24
References
29
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
Keywords
extended gravity, cosmic acceleration, cosmological constant problem, self-tuning, attractor solutions, ghost-free gravity, de Sitter cosmology, inflation (cosmology)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review