Cited by 8Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Constraints on vacuum energy from structure formation and Nucleosynthesis

Open access
Adams, Fred C., Alexander, Stephon, Grohs, Evan, Mersini-Houghton, Laura·2017·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

This paper derives an upper limit on the density ρ Λ of dark energy based on the requirement that cosmological structure forms before being frozen out by the eventual acceleration of the universe. By allowing for variations in both the cosmological parameters and the strength of gravity, the resulting constraint is a generalization of previous limits. The specific parameters under consideration include the amplitude Q of the primordial density fluctuations, the Planck mass M pl , the baryon-to-photon ratio η, and the density ratio Ω M /Ω b . In addition to structure formation, we use considerations from stellar structure and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) to constrain these quantities. The resulting upper limit on the dimensionless density of dark energy becomes ρ Λ / M pl 4 < 10 −90 , which is ∼30 orders of magnitude larger than the value in our universe ρ Λ / M pl 4 ∼ 10 −120 . This new limit is much less restrictive than previous constraints because additional parameters are allowed to vary. With these generalizations, a much wider range of universes can develop cosmic structure and support observers. To constrain the constituent parameters, new BBN calculations are carried out in the regime where η and G = M pl −2 are much larger than in our universe. If the BBN epoch were to process all of the protons into heavier elements, no hydrogen would be left behind to make water, and the universe would not be viable. However, our results show that some hydrogen is always left over, even under conditions of extremely large η and G , so that a wide range of alternate universes are potentially habitable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/021

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. WMAP collaboration, D.N. Spergel et al., Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three year results: implications for cosmology, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 170 (2007) 377 [astro-ph/0603449] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Supernova Cosmology Project collaboration, S. Perlmutter et al., Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565 [astro-ph/9812133] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Supernova Search Team collaboration, A.G. Riess et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009 [astro-ph/9805201] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. A.G. Riess et al., A 3% Solution: Determination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3, Astrophys. J. 730 (2011) 119 [Erratum ibid. 732 (2011) 129] [arXiv:1103.2976] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  5. J.D. Barrow and F.J. Tipler, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford University Press (1986).
  6. B. Carter and W.H. McCrea, The Anthropic Principle and its Implications for Biological Evolution [and Discussion], Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 310 (1983) 347. · DOI · Paper page
  7. S. Weinberg, Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 2607 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. A. Aguirre and M. Tegmark, Multiple universes, cosmic coincidences and other dark matters, JCAP 01 (2005) 003 [hep-th/0409072] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  9. H. Martel, P.R. Shapiro and S. Weinberg, Likely values of the cosmological constant, Astrophys. J. 492 (1998) 29 [astro-ph/9701099] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  10. L. Mersini-Houghton and F.C. Adams, Limitations of anthropic predictions for the cosmological constant Λ: Cosmic Heat Death of Anthropic Observers, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 165002 [arXiv:0810.4914] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  11. P.A.M. Dirac, The Cosmological constants, Nature 139 (1937) 323 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. M. Tegmark, A. Aguirre, M.J. Rees and F. Wilczek, Dimensionless Constants, Cosmology, and other Dark Matters, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 3505 [astro-ph/0511774] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. C.J. Hogan, Why the universe is just so, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 (2000) 1149 [astro-ph/9909295] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  14. E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, The Early Universe, Addison-Wesley (1990).
  15. COBE collaboration, G.F. Smoot et al., Structure in the COBE differential microwave radiometer first year maps, Astrophys. J. 396 (1992) L1 [INSPIRE]. JCAP03(2017)021 · DOI
  16. F.C. Adams, K.R. Coppess and A.M. Bloch, Planets in Other Universes: Habitability constraints on density fluctuations and galactic structure, JCAP 09 (2015) 030 [arXiv:1505.06158] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. E. Grohs, G.M. Fuller, C.T. Kishimoto and M.W. Paris, Probing Neutrino Physics with a Self-Consistent Treatment of the Weak Decoupling, Nucleosynthesis, and Photon Decoupling Epochs, JCAP 05 (2015) 017 [arXiv:1502.02718] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. M.S. Smith, L.H. Kawano and R.A. Malaney, Experimental, computational and observational analysis of primordial nucleosynthesis, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 85 (1993) 219 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. R.V. Wagoner, Big bang nucleosynthesis revisited, Astrophys. J. 179 (1973) 343 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. F.C. Adams, Constraints on Alternate Universes: Stars and habitable planets with different fundamental constants, JCAP 02 (2016) 042 [arXiv:1511.06958] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. E. Grohs and G.M. Fuller, The surprising influence of late charged current weak interactions on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, Nucl. Phys. B 911 (2016) 955 [arXiv:1607.02797] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  22. E. Grohs, G.M. Fuller, C.T. Kishimoto and M.W. Paris, Lepton asymmetry, neutrino spectral distortions and big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 063503 [arXiv:1612.01986] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. A. Vilenkin, Predictions from quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 846 [gr-qc/9406010] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. J. García-Bellido, A.D. Linde and D.A. Linde, Fluctuations of the gravitational constant in the inflationary Brans-Dicke cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 730 [astro-ph/9312039] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  25. A. Vilenkin, Making predictions in eternally inflating universe, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 3365 [gr-qc/9505031] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  26. A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and A. Mezhlumian, Do we live in the center of the world?, Phys. Lett. B 345 (1995) 203 [hep-th/9411111] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. S.M. Carroll, Is our universe natural?, Nature 440 (2006) 1132 [hep-th/0512148] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin, On likely values of the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 083502 [astro-ph/9908115] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  29. G.W. Gibbons and N. Turok, The Measure Problem in Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 3516 [hep-th/0609095] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. M.J. Rees and J.P. Ostriker, Cooling, Dynamics and Fragmentation of Massive Gas Clouds: Clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 179 (1977) 541. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, F. C., Alexander, S., Grohs, E., & Mersini-Houghton, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2017-03-10
Volume
2017
Issue
03
Pages
021-021
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W2575908251
Cited by
8
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • UNC Libraries
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
vacuum energy, dark energy, cosmological constant, structure formation, big bang nucleosynthesis, primordial density fluctuations, baryon-to-photon ratio, modified gravity, Planck mass, cosmic acceleration, stellar structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review