Cited by 400Muscle activation and electromyography studiesPeripheral Nerve DisordersMuscle Physiology and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accurate identification of motor unit discharge patterns from high-density surface EMG and validation with a novel signal-based performance metric.

Open access
Holobar, A, Minetto, M A, Farina, D·2014·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A signal-based metric for assessment of accuracy of motor unit (MU) identification from high-density surface electromyograms (EMG) is introduced. This metric, so-called pulse-to-noise-ratio (PNR), is computationally efficient, does not require any additional experimental costs and can be applied to every MU that is identified by the previously developed convolution kernel compensation technique. APPROACH: The analytical derivation of the newly introduced metric is provided, along with its extensive experimental validation on both synthetic and experimental surface EMG signals with signal-to-noise ratios ranging from 0 to 20 dB and muscle contraction forces from 5% to 70% of the maximum voluntary contraction. MAIN RESULTS: In all the experimental and simulated signals, the newly introduced metric correlated significantly with both sensitivity and false alarm rate in identification of MU discharges. Practically all the MUs with PNR > 30 dB exhibited sensitivity >90% and false alarm rates <2%. Therefore, a threshold of 30 dB in PNR can be used as a simple method for selecting only reliably decomposed units. SIGNIFICANCE: The newly introduced metric is considered a robust and reliable indicator of accuracy of MU identification. The study also shows that high-density surface EMG can be reliably decomposed at contraction forces as high as 70% of the maximum.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/11/1/016008

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Holobar A, 2013, IEEE NER Proc., 585
  2. Rosenfalck P, 1969, Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl., 47, 239

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Holobar, A., Minetto, M. A., & Farina, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Maribor (SI)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Holobar, A
  • Minetto, M A
  • Farina, D
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2014-01-08
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
016008
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2042861111
Cited by
400
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
motor unit identification, high-density surface electromyography, motor unit firing patterns, signal-to-noise ratio, muscle contraction force, motor unit decomposition
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electromyography, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Motor Neurons, Muscle Contraction, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Linear Models, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Signal-To-Noise Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review