The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust artifactual independent component classification for BCI practitioners
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: EEG artifacts of non-neural origin can be separated from neural signals by independent component analysis (ICA). It is unclear (1) how robustly recently proposed artifact classifiers transfer to novel users, novel paradigms or changed electrode setups, and (2) how artifact cleaning by a machine learning classifier impacts the performance of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). APPROACH: Addressing (1), the robustness of different strategies with respect to the transfer between paradigms and electrode setups of a recently proposed classifier is investigated on offline data from 35 users and 3 EEG paradigms, which contain 6303 expert-labeled components from two ICA and preprocessing variants. Addressing (2), the effect of artifact removal on single-trial BCI classification is estimated on BCI trials from 101 users and 3 paradigms. MAIN RESULTS: We show that (1) the proposed artifact classifier generalizes to completely different EEG paradigms. To obtain similar results under massively reduced electrode setups, a proposed novel strategy improves artifact classification. Addressing (2), ICA artifact cleaning has little influence on average BCI performance when analyzed by state-of-the-art BCI methods. When slow motor-related features are exploited, performance varies strongly between individuals, as artifacts may obstruct relevant neural activity or are inadvertently used for BCI control. SIGNIFICANCE: Robustness of the proposed strategies can be reproduced by EEG practitioners as the method is made available as an EEGLAB plug-in.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis
Blankertz, B., Tomioka, R., Lemm, S., Kawanabe, M., & Muller, K.-R. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.4408441 · Cited by 2,080 · cited 1×
“After enhancing the SNR of these effects by individual data-driven spatial filters, which are derived by the common spatial patterns (CSP) analysis [51], CSPfeatures can be classified by a shrinkage-regularized linear classifier.”
MethodNeurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance
Blankertz, B., Sannelli, C., Halder, S., Hammer, E. M., Kübler, A., Müller, K.-R., Curio, G., & Dickhaus, T. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.022 · Cited by 674
The Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Non-Medical Uses of BCI Technology
Blankertz, B., Tangermann, M., Vidaurre, C., Fazli, S., Sannelli, C., Haufe, S., Maeder, C., Ramsey, L., Sturm, I., Curio, G., et al. (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2010.00198 · Cited by 357
Self-citationCombining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Haufe, S., Nikulin, V. V., Ziehe, A., Müller, K.-R., & Nolte, G. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.246 · Cited by 130
Cited by
Chang, C.-Y., Hsu, S.-H., Pion-Tonachini, L., & Jung, T.-P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2019.2930186 · Cited by 544
Longitudinal EEG power in the first postnatal year differentiates autism outcomes
Gabard-Durnam, L. J., Wilkinson, C., Kapur, K., Tager-Flusberg, H., Levin, A. R., & Nelson, C. A. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12202-9 · Cited by 179
Augmenting the size of EEG datasets using generative adversarial networks
Abdelfattah, S. M., Abdelrahman, G. M., & Wang, M. (2018) · 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2018.8489727 · Cited by 122
Škola, F., Tinková, S., & Liarokapis, F. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00329 · Cited by 102
Signal Artifacts and Techniques for Artifacts and Noise Removal
Islam, M. K., Rastegarnia, A., & Sanei, S. (2021) · Intelligent Systems Reference Library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54932-9_2 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Winkler, I., Brandl, S., Horn, F., Waldburger, E., Allefeld, C., & Tangermann, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-05-19
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 035013
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W1994321338
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust artifactual independent component classification for BCI practitioners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/035013
- The paper
- Winkler, I., Brandl, S., Horn, F., Waldburger, E., Allefeld, C., & Tangermann, M. (2014). Robust artifactual independent component classification for BCI practitioners. Journal of Neural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/035013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.