Cited by 15Muscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Use of probabilistic weights to enhance linear regression myoelectric control

Open access
Smith, Lauren H, Kuiken, Todd A, Hargrove, Levi J·2015·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinically available prostheses for transradial amputees do not allow simultaneous myoelectric control of degrees of freedom (DOFs). Linear regression methods can provide simultaneous myoelectric control, but frequently also result in difficulty with isolating individual DOFs when desired. This study evaluated the potential of using probabilistic estimates of categories of gross prosthesis movement, which are commonly used in classification-based myoelectric control, to enhance linear regression myoelectric control. APPROACH: Gaussian models were fit to electromyogram (EMG) feature distributions for three movement classes at each DOF (no movement, or movement in either direction) and used to weight the output of linear regression models by the probability that the user intended the movement. Eight able-bodied and two transradial amputee subjects worked in a virtual Fitts' law task to evaluate differences in controllability between linear regression and probability-weighted regression for an intramuscular EMG-based three-DOF wrist and hand system. MAIN RESULTS: Real-time and offline analyses in able-bodied subjects demonstrated that probability weighting improved performance during single-DOF tasks (p < 0.05) by preventing extraneous movement at additional DOFs. Similar results were seen in experiments with two transradial amputees. Though goodness-of-fit evaluations suggested that the EMG feature distributions showed some deviations from the Gaussian, equal-covariance assumptions used in this experiment, the assumptions were sufficiently met to provide improved performance compared to linear regression control. SIGNIFICANCE: Use of probability weights can improve the ability to isolate individual during linear regression myoelectric control, while maintaining the ability to simultaneously control multiple DOFs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066030

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • That approach gave usable signal amplitude and allowed some prosthetic limb control in transradial amputees.

    “This strategy has provided reasonable signal amplitude and some control of a prosthetic limb in patients undergoing transradial amputations (24–28).”

    From A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees (2020) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Methods and amputee-subject Results report that two transradial amputees used EMG to control a cursor in a virtual task. The Discussion explicitly says physical-prosthesis testing remains to be done, and the paper does not establish that the strategy provided reasonable signal amplitude. Thus, it supports some myoelectric control in transradial amputees, but not the claimed signal amplitude or control of a physical prosthetic limb. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Earlier studies obtained prosthetic control signals by connecting to intact residual-limb muscles.

    “In previous studies, investigators have provided prosthetic control signals by interfacing with intact muscles in the residual limb.”
  • Earlier work on simultaneous multiple-DOF control concentrated on wrist and hand open/closed control.

    “Previous studies of simultaneous control of multiple DOFs have focused on controlling the wrist and hand open/closed (26, 28, 30).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Amsuss S Gobel P Graimann B Farina D Simultaneous, proportional wrist and hand control for natural, dexterous movements of a physical prosthesis by amputees Myoelectric Controls Symposium 2014 Fredericton Canada New Brunswick
  2. Kuiken TA Turner K Soltys N Dumanian GA First clinical fitting of an individual after bilateral TMR with intuitive pattern recognition control Myoelectric Controls Symposium 2014 Fredericton, Canada New Brunswick 121 124
  3. Smith LH Hargrove LJ Surface versus intramuscular EMG for linear regression-based myoelectric control of the wrist and hand Myoelectric Controls Symposium 2014 Fredericton New Brunswick

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, L. H., Kuiken, T. A., & Hargrove, L. J.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Smith, Lauren H
  • Kuiken, Todd A
  • Hargrove, Levi J
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2015-11-23
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
066030
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2285656057
Cited by
15
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Chicago Biomedical Consortium
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
myoelectric control, linear regression, transradial amputation, prosthetic hand, electromyography, Gaussian model, movement classification, Fitts' law, degrees of freedom
MeSH terms
Amputees, Electromyography, Hand, Humans, Probability, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review