Cited by 26Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeural dynamics and brain functionAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design

A new planar multielectrode array: recording from a rat auditory cortex

Tsytsarev, Vassiliy, Taketani, Makoto, Schottler, Frank, Tanaka, Shigeru, Hara, Masahiko·2006·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

In the study of the spatiotemporal properties of the cortex, a demand often arises for recording local field evoked potentials (LFEP) and neural spikes from a quantity of points at close range from each other. In such a situation a device composed of a lot of electrodes assembled in a single bunch would be suitable. Such circumstances gave us the impetus to create the device described in this paper, namely a new planar electrode array for in vivo multisite extracellular recording. The device is made of plastic and includes platinum electrodes 50 microm in diameter. The array of 64 incorporated microelectrodes is placed on the surface of the cortex of anesthetized rats. Recordings could be made through all electrodes for more than 1 h without damage to the cortex. The inter-polar distance is approximately 100 microm so that each individual electrode can record activity from a separate population of neurons near the cortical surface. The recording system described here is highly useful for visualizing spatiotemporal structure of the cortical activities and for imaging dynamic neuronal assemblies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/3/4/006

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A planar multi-electrode array has been used for recording from a rat auditory cortex and visualizing spatiotemporal structure of cortical activities.

    “Another implant is the planar multi-electrode array for recording from a rat auditory cortex and visualizing a spatiotemporal structure of the cortical activities (Tsytsarev et al., 2006).”

    From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Tsytsarev et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsytsarev, V., Taketani, M., Schottler, F., Tanaka, S., & Hara, M.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
  • Panasonic (Japan) (JP)
  • RIKEN (JP)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2006-10-06
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
293-298
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2130315702
Cited by
26
References
21
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Keywords
auditory cortex, extracellular recording, platinum microelectrodes, rat cortex
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Auditory Cortex, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Microelectrodes, Micromanipulation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review