Cited by 387Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

A MEMS-based flexible multichannel ECoG-electrode array

Open access
Rubehn, Birthe, Bosman, Conrado, Oostenveld, Robert, Fries, Pascal, Stieglitz, Thomas·2009·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

We present a micromachined 252-channel ECoG (electrocorticogram)-electrode array, which is made of a thin polyimide foil substrate enclosing sputtered platinum electrode sites and conductor paths. The array subtends an area of approximately 35 mm by 60 mm and is designed to cover large parts of a hemisphere of a macaque monkey's cortex. Eight omnetics connectors are directly soldered to the foil. This leads to a compact assembly size which enables a chronic implantation of the array and allows free movements of the animal between the recording sessions. The electrode sites are 1 mm in diameter and were characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. At 1 kHz, the electrode impedances vary between 1.5 kOmega and 5 kOmega. The yield of functioning electrodes in three assembled devices is 99.5%. After implantation of a device with 100% working electrodes, standard electrocorticographic signals can be obtained from every electrode. The response to visual stimuli can be measured with electrodes lying on the visual cortex. After an implantation time of 4.5 months, all electrodes are still working and no decline in signal quality could be observed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/6/3/036003

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubehn, B., Bosman, C., Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., & Stieglitz, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2009-05-12
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
036003
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W1990283232
Cited by
387
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
electrocorticography, flexible electrode arrays, polyimide substrate, platinum electrode, chronic implantation, electrode impedance, visual cortex responses, visual stimulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Equipment Design, Macaca, Microelectrodes, Equipment Failure Analysis, Micro-Electrical-Mechanical Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review