The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain–computer interface using a simplified functional near-infrared spectroscopy system
Open accessAbstract
A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a device that allows a user to communicate with external devices through thought processes alone. A novel signal acquisition tool for BCIs is near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), an optical technique to measure localized cortical brain activity. The benefits of using this non-invasive modality are safety, portability and accessibility. A number of commercial multi-channel NIRS system are available; however we have developed a straightforward custom-built system to investigate the functionality of a fNIRS-BCI system. This work describes the construction of the device, the principles of operation and the implementation of a fNIRS-BCI application, 'Mindswitch' that harnesses motor imagery for control. Analysis is performed online and feedback of performance is presented to the user. Mindswitch presents a basic 'on/off' switching option to the user, where selection of either state takes 1 min. Initial results show that fNIRS can support simple BCI functionality and shows much potential. Although performance may be currently inferior to many EEG systems, there is much scope for development particularly with more sophisticated signal processing and classification techniques. We hope that by presenting fNIRS as an accessible and affordable option, a new avenue of exploration will open within the BCI research community and stimulate further research in fNIRS-BCIs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Cited by
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143
fNIRS-based brain-computer interfaces: a review
Naseer, N., & Hong, K.-S. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00003 · Cited by 988
Cui, X., Bryant, D. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.003 · Cited by 807
“NIRS is a relatively flexible technology and to date has been successfully applied in several domains [22], including physiological mechanisms of the BOLD response [23-31], non-invasive brain-computer interfaces [32-36], and brain activity in both active tasks and resting states [37-42].”
Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment
Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P. A., Bunce, S., Izzetoglu, K., Willems, B., & Onaral, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.023 · Cited by 650
Decoding of four movement directions using hybrid NIRS-EEG brain-computer interface
Khan, M. J., Hong, M. J., & Hong, K.-S. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00244 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Coyle, S. M., Ward, T. E., & Markham, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-04-27
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-226
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W2104946207
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain–computer interface using a simplified functional near-infrared spectroscopy system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/007
- The paper
- Coyle, S. M., Ward, T. E., & Markham, C. M. (2007). Brain–computer interface using a simplified functional near-infrared spectroscopy system. Journal of Neural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.