Cited by 9Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and ResearchVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Measurement of the current–distance relationship using a novel refractory interaction technique

Open access
Mahnam, Amin, Hashemi, S Mohammad Reza, Grill, Warren M·2009·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

It is important to know the spatial extent of neural activation around the stimulating electrodes when using extracellular electrical stimulation for the determination of the structure and function of neural circuit connections or for the restoration of function. The current-distance relationship quantifies the relationship between the threshold current for excitation of a neuron, I(th), and the distance between the electrode and the neuron, r, with two parameters: the offset, I(0), and the current-distance constant, k, with a quadratic equation, I(th)(r) = I(0) + kr(2). We proposed a new method to determine the parameters of the current-distance relationship, and thereby estimate the spatial extent of activation, based on the refractory interaction technique. Refractory interaction is a method that exploits the interaction between the regions of activation produced by two electrodes, when the second stimulus is delivered while neurons activated by the first electrode are in their refractory period. Computer simulations of electrical stimulation of a population of nerve fibers were used to determine the accuracy of the method. The mean relative error in k was 19% and in I(0) was 17%, and the spatial extent of stimulation could be determined with an absolute error of 19 microm and a relative error less than 11%. Subsequently, the method was applied to measure the current-distance properties of peripheral motor nerve fibers and indicated that k = 27 microA mm(-2) and I(0) = 49 microA. This method provided robust estimates of the current-distance properties, and provides a means to determine the spatial extent of activation by extracellular stimulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/6/3/036005

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peripheral nerves have a highly branched structure and high person-to-person variability in anatomy, both in branching structure and in the location of fascicles that innervate specific muscles.

    “Peripheral nerves, however, have a highly branched structure, and there is a high degree of person-to-person variability in the anatomy of those nerves, both in branching structure and in the location of fascicles that innervate specific muscles [7,8].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahnam, A., Hashemi, S. M. R., & Grill, W. M.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2009-05-20
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
036005
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2052819534
Cited by
9
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS040894)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
extracellular electrical stimulation, stimulation threshold
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Simulation, Electric Stimulation, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Fibers, Nerve Net, Refractory Period, Electrophysiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review