The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system
Open accessAbstract
Biomass from cellulosic bioenergy crops is expected to play a substantial role in future energy systems, especially if climate policy aims at stabilizing greenhouse gas concentration at low levels. However, the potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation remains unclear due to large uncertainties about future agricultural yield improvements and land availability for biomass plantations. This letter, by applying a modelling framework with detailed economic representation of the land and energy sector, explores the cost-effective contribution of bioenergy to a low-carbon transition, paying special attention to implications for the land system. In this modelling framework, bioenergy competes directly with other energy technology options on the basis of costs, including implicit costs due to biophysical constraints on land and water availability. As a result, we find that bioenergy from specialized grassy and woody bioenergy crops, such as Miscanthus or poplar, can contribute approximately 100 EJ in 2055 and up to 300 EJ of primary energy in 2095. Protecting natural forests decreases biomass availability for energy production in the medium, but not in the long run. Reducing the land available for agricultural use can partially be compensated for by means of higher rates of technological change in agriculture. In addition, our trade-off analysis indicates that forest protection combined with large-scale cultivation of dedicated bioenergy is likely to affect bioenergy potentials, but also to increase global food prices and increase water scarcity. Therefore, integrated policies for energy, land use and water management are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The amount of bioenergy supplied is reduced to about 70 EJ in 2055 and 270 EJ in 2095 in the scenario with 100% forest conservation [27].”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“For this specific scenario, biomass from dedicated bioenergy crops will contribute 25% to the total global demand for primary energy carriers.”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“In the scenario without forest conservation, bioenergy demand increases up to about 300 EJ in 2095 with a demand of about 100 EJ in 2055.”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The food price index rises most strongly in Europe (22%) and in the the Newly Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (16%) until 2095 if climate change mitigation is taken into account and all suitable land is available for land expansion.”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“In the scenario without forest conservation, cultivation of dedicated bioenergy crops increases total cropland to 1830 million ha, but forest exclusion limits total cropland to 1520 million ha in 2095.”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“But if forest conservation is considered, the food price index rises most prominently in Sub-Saharan Africa (82%), Latin America (73%) and Pacific Asia (52%) until 2095.”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Due to increasing bioenergy demand the global rate of yield increase would have to rise to 0.8% per year.”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Simulation results reveal that in the scenario without forest conservation up to 29 Gt of additional cumulative CO 2 emissions from land use change due to the cultivation of dedicated bioenergy crops are likely to occur until 2095.”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“An average global rate of yield increase of 0.6% per year is projected until 2095.”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“These co-emissions are negligible in the scenario with forest conservation [27].”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“In the scenario without forest conservation, strongest growth in the regional water price index, i.e. changes in shadow prices for irrigation water relative to the reference scenario until 2095, can be found in Latin America (210%), the Newly Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (170%) and Pacific Asia (130%).”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Total cropland (excluding abandoned land) increases from 1442 million ha in 2005 to 1770 million ha in 2095.”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The highest rate (0.9% per year until 2095) can be found in the forest conservation scenario, due to additional restrictions of land availability for agricultural expansion [27].”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“The forest conservation scenario increases the regional water price index most heavily in Latin America (460%), Sub Saharan Africa (390%) and Pacific Asia (330%) [27].”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151861 · Cited by 4,888
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902
Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends
Hassan, R., Scholes, R. J., & Ash, N. (2005) · Cited by 2,582
Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be
Haszeldine, R. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172246 · Cited by 2,021
Ethanol for a Sustainable Energy Future
Goldemberg, J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1137013 · Cited by 1,423
Trading Water for Carbon with Biological Carbon Sequestration
Jackson, R. B., Jobbágy, E. G., Avissar, R., Roy, S. B., Barrett, D. J., Cook, C. W., Farley, K. A., le Maitre, D. C., McCarl, B. A., & Murray, B. C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1119282 · Cited by 1,345
Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance
Bondeau, A., Smith, P. L., Zaehle, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Crämer, W., Gerten, D., Lotze‐Campen, H., Müller, C., Reichstein, M., et al. (2006) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x · Cited by 1,333
Crutzen, P. J., Mosier, A. R., Smith, K. A., & Winiwarter, W. (2008) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-8-389-2008 · Cited by 1,298
Crutzen, P. J., Mosier, A. R., Smith, K. A., & Winiwarter, W. (2007) · doi:10.5194/acpd-7-11191-2007 · Cited by 1,298
Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests
Barlow, J., Gardner, T. A., Araujo, I. S., Ávila‐Pires, T. C. S., Bonaldo, A. B., Costa, J. E., Espósito, M. C., Ferreira, L. V., Hawes, J. E., Hernández, M. I. M., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0703333104 · Cited by 1,200
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Hassan R, 2005, Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group, 77
- 10.1034/j.1600-0889.2003.01450.x · DOI
- Popp A, 2011, Biomass Bioenergy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–202 of 202
Fofrich, R., Chiu, A., & Ordway, E. M. (2026) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag123
Metadata
- Authors
- Popp, A., Dietrich, J. P., Lotze-Campen, H., Klein, D., Bauer, N., Krause, M., Beringer, T., Gerten, D., & Edenhofer, O.
- Affiliations
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 034017
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168143993
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 39.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DepositOnce (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Technische Universität Berlin – Universitätsbibliothek (cc-by)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Keywords
- bioenergy, climate change mitigation, land use, land availability, agricultural yields, forest protection, Miscanthus, poplar, water scarcity, food prices, low-carbon transition, energy policy, bioenergy potential
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
