The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature
Open accessAbstract
This report provides estimates of operational water withdrawal and water consumption factors for electricity generating technologies in the United States. Estimates of water factors were collected from published primary literature and were not modified except for unit conversions. The water factors presented may be useful in modeling and policy analyses where reliable power plant level data are not available. Major findings of the report include: water withdrawal and consumption factors vary greatly across and within fuel technologies, and water factors show greater agreement when organized according to cooling technologies as opposed to fuel technologies; a transition to a less carbon-intensive electricity sector could result in either an increase or a decrease in water use, depending on the choice of technologies and cooling systems employed; concentrating solar power technologies and coal facilities with carbon capture and sequestration capabilities have the highest water consumption values when using a recirculating cooling system; and non-thermal renewables, such as photovoltaics and wind, have the lowest water consumption factors. Improved power plant data and further studies into the water requirements of energy technologies in different climatic regions would facilitate greater resolution in analyses of water impacts of future energy and economic scenarios. This report provides the foundation for conducting water use impact assessments of the power sector while also identifying gaps in data that could guide future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drought under global warming: a review
Dai, A. (2011) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.81 · Cited by 3,523
Cited by
Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions
Smith, P., Davis, S. J., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Minx, J., Gabrielle, B., Kato, E., Jackson, R. B., Cowie, A., Kriegler, E., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2870 · Cited by 1,440
Can BECCS deliver sustainable and resource efficient negative emissions?
Fajardy, M., & Mac Dowell, N. (2017) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee00465f · Cited by 392
The consumptive water footprint of electricity and heat: a global assessment
Mekonnen, M. M., Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2015) · Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology · doi:10.1039/c5ew00026b · Cited by 308
Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M. A., & Ren, S. (2025) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3724499 · Cited by 176
Energy sector water use implications of a 2 °C climate policy
Fricko, O., Parkinson, S. C., Johnson, N., Strubegger, M., Vliet, M. T. V., & Riahi, K. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034011 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Macknick, J., Newmark, R., Heath, G., & Hallett, K. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-12-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 045802
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111061615
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045802
- The paper
- Macknick, J., Newmark, R., Heath, G., & Hallett, K. C. (2012). Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.