Cited by 234Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementOil Palm Production and SustainabilityAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Deforestation risk due to commodity crop expansion in sub-Saharan Africa

Open access
Ordway, Elsa M, Asner, Gregory P, Lambin, Eric F·2017·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Rapid integration of global agricultural markets and subsequent cropland displacement in recent decades increased large-scale tropical deforestation in South America and Southeast Asia. Growing land scarcity and more stringent land use regulations in these regions could incentivize the offshoring of export-oriented commodity crops to sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We assess the effects of domestic- and export-oriented agricultural expansion on deforestation in SSA in recent decades. Analyses were conducted at the global, regional and local scales. We found that commodity crops are expanding in SSA, increasing pressure on tropical forests. Four Congo Basin countries, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Côte d'Ivoire were most at risk in terms of exposure, vulnerability and pressures from agricultural expansion. These countries averaged the highest percent forest cover (58% ± 17.93) and lowest proportions of potentially available cropland outside forest areas (1% ± 0.89). Foreign investment in these countries was concentrated in oil palm production (81%), with a median investment area of 41 582 thousand ha. Cocoa, the fastest expanding export-oriented crop across SSA, accounted for 57% of global expansion in 2000–2013 at a rate of 132 thousand ha yr −1 . However, cocoa only amounted to 0.89% of foreign land investment. Commodity crop expansion in SSA appears largely driven by small- and medium-scale farmers rather than industrial plantations. Land-use changes associated with large-scale investments remain to be observed in many countries. Although domestic demand for commodity crops was associated with most agricultural expansion, we provide evidence of a growing influence of distant markets on land-use change in SSA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6509

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pressure on sub-Saharan African forests from smallholder and commercial agriculture is rapidly intensifying.

    “However pressure on sub-Saharan African forests, from among others smallholder and commercial agriculture, is rapidly intensifying (Ordway et al 2017, FAO, UNEP 2020).”

    From The impact of deforestation on rainfall in Africa: a data-driven assessment (2021) · cites this paper as Ordway et al 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. McKenzie L W 1953 Specialisation and efficiency in world production The Rev. of Econ. Studies 21 165-80 · DOI
  2. Hertel T W 2011 The global supply and demand for agricultural land in 2050: a perfect storm in the making? American J. Agri. Econ. 93 259-75 · DOI
  3. Kastner T, Erb K H and Haberl H 2014 Rapid growth in agricultural trade: effects on global area efficiency and the role of management Environ. Res. Lett. 9 034015 · DOI
  4. le Polain de Waroux Y, Garrett R D, Heilmayr R and Lambin E F 2016 Land-use policies and corporate investments in agriculture in the Gran Chaco and Chiquitano Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113 4021-26 · DOI
  5. Meyfroidt P, Lambin E F, Erb K H and Hertel T W 2013 Globalization of land use: distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use Curr. Op. Env. Sust. 5 438-44 · DOI
  6. Brown C, Murray-Rust D, van Vliet J, Alam S J, Verburg P H and Rounsevell M D 2014 Experiments in globalisation, food security and land use decision making PLoS one 9 114213 · DOI
  7. Fitzherbert E B, Struebig M J, Morel A, Danielsen F, Brühl C A, Donald P F and Phalan B 2008 How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Eco. Evo. 23 538-45 · DOI
  8. Aragão L E O, Malhi Y, Barbier N, Lima A, Shimabukuro Y, Anderson L and Saatchi S 2008 Interactions between rainfall, deforestation and fires during recent years in the Brazilian Amazonia Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363 1779-85 · DOI
  9. Hoffmann W A, Schroeder W and Jackson R B 2003 Regional feedbacks among fire, climate, and tropical deforestation J. Geo. Res. Atm. 108 4721 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Weinzettel J, Hertwich E G, Peters G P, Steen-Olsen K and Galli A 2013 Affluence drives the global displacement of land use Glob. Environ. Change 23 433-8 · DOI
  11. Rudel T K, Defries R, Asner G P and Laurance W F 2009 Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation Cons. Biol. 23 1396-1405 · DOI
  12. DeFries R S, Rudel T, Uriarte M and Hansen M 2010 Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century Nat. Geo. 3 178-81 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hosonuma N, Herold M, De Sy V, De Fries R S, Brockhaus M, Verchot L, Angelsen A and Romijn E 2012 An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries Environ. Res. Lett. 7 044009 · DOI · Paper page
  14. DeFries R S, Herold M, Verchot L, Macedo M N and Shimabukuro Y 2013 Export-oriented deforestation in Mato Grosso: harbinger or exception for other tropical forests? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368 20120173 · DOI
  15. Hansen M C et al 2008 Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 105 9439-44 · DOI
  16. Kastner T, Rivas M J I, Koch W and Nonhebel S 2012 Global changes in diets and the consequences for land requirements for food Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109 6868-72 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Feintrenie L 2014 Agro-industrial plantations in Central Africa, risks and opportunities Biodiv. Cons. 23 1577-89 · DOI
  18. Jayne T S, Chamberlin J and Headey D D 2014a Land pressures, the evolution of farming systems, and development strategies in Africa: a synthesis Food Pol. 48 1-17 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Laurance W F, Sayer J and Cassman K G 2014 Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature Trends Ecol. Evol. 29 107-16 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gasparri N I, Kuemmerle T, Meyfroidt P, Waroux Y and Kreft H 2016 The emerging soybean production frontier in Southern Africa: conservation challenges and the role of south-south telecouplings Cons. Lett. 9 21-31 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Schoneveld G C 2014 The geographic and sectoral patterns of large-scale farmland investments in sub-Saharan Africa Food Pol. 48 34-50 · DOI
  22. Meyfroidt P, Rudel T K and Lambin E F 2010 Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107 20917-22 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Carlson K M, Curran L M, Ratnasari D, Pittman A M, Soares-Filho B S, Asner G P, Trigg S N, Gaveau D A, Lawrence D and Rodrigues H O 2012 Committed carbon emissions, deforestation, and community land conversion from oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 19 7559-64 · DOI
  24. Gutiérrez-Vélez V H, DeFries R, Pinedo-Vásquez M, Uriarte M, Padoch C, Baethgen W, Fernandes K and Lim Y 2011 High-yield oil palm expansion spares land at the expense of forests in the Peruvian Amazon Environ. Res. Lett. 6 044029 · DOI
  25. Rudel T K 2013 The national determinants of deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368 20120405 · DOI
  26. Carlson K M, Curran L M, Asner G P, Pittman A M, Trigg S N and Adeney J M 2013 Carbon emissions from forest conversion by Kalimantan oil palm plantations Nat. Clim. Change 3 283-7 · DOI
  27. Chamberlin J, Jayne T S and Headey D 2014 Scarcity amidst abundance? Reassessing the potential for cropland expansion in Africa Food Pol. 48 51-65 · DOI
  28. Saatchi et al 2011 Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108 9899-904 · DOI
  29. Zhu W, Lestander T A, Örberg H, Wei M, Hedman B, Ren J, Xie G and Xiong S 2015 Cassava stems: a new resource to increase food and fuel production Glob. Change Bio. Bioenergy 7 72-83 · DOI
  30. Cardona O D, van Aalst M K, Birkmann J, Fordham M, McGregor G and Mechler R 2012 Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 65-108
  31. Birkmann J 2006 Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: conceptual frameworks and definitions Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies (New Delhi: United Nations University Press) pp 9-54
  32. Hansen M C, Stehman S V and Potapov P V 2010 Quantification of global gross forest cover loss Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107 8650-5 · DOI
  33. Harris N L, Brown S, Hagen S C, Saatchi S S, Petrova S, Salas W, Hansen M C, Potapov P V and Lotsch A 2012 Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions Science 336 1573-6 · DOI
  34. Gockowski J and Sonwa D 2011 Cocoa intensification scenarios and their predicted impact on CO 2 emissions, biodiversity conservation, and rural livelihoods in the Guinea rain forest of West Africa Env. Mgmt. 48 307-21 · DOI
  35. Evans J S, Murphy M A, Holden Z A and Cushman S A 2011 Modeling species distribution and change using random forest Predictive Species and Habitat Modeling in Landscape Ecology ed C A Drew, Y F Wiersma and F Huettmann (New York: Springer) pp 139-59 (https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7390-0_8) · DOI
  36. Yu Y, Feng K and Hubacek K 2013 Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use Glob. Environ. Change 23 1178-86 · DOI
  37. Li F and Mo D 2016 The burgeoning chocolate market in China The Economics of Chocolate (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 383-99 (https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780198726449.003.0019) · DOI
  38. Palm C A et al 2005 Carbon losses and sequestration after land use change in the humid tropics Slash and Burn: The Search for Alternatives (New York: Columbia University Press) pp 41-63
  39. Bitty E A, Bi S G, Bene J C K, Kouassi P K and McGraw W S 2015 Cocoa farming and primate extirpation inside Cote d'Ivoire's protected areas Trop. Cons. Science 8 95-113
  40. Clough Y, Faust H and Tscharntke T 2009 Cacao boom and bust: sustainability of agroforests and opportunities for biodiversity conservation Cons. Lett. 2 197-205 · DOI
  41. Liang J et al 2016 Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests Science 354 8957 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Vadjunec J M, Radel C and Turner B L II 2016 Introduction: the continued importance of smallholders today Land 5 34 · DOI
  43. Unruh J D 2008 Carbon sequestration in Africa: the land tenure problem Glob. Environ. Change 18 700-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ordway, E. M., Asner, G. P., & Lambin, E. F.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
Corresponding author
Ordway, Elsa M
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2017-04-01
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
044015
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605224014
Cited by
234
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
12.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Environmental Research Letters (cc-by)
Funders
  • McGee/Levorsen Research Grant
  • Graduate Research Fellowship Program, National Science Foundation (2012118590)
  • Center for African Studies, Stanford University
  • Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
tropical deforestation, sub-Saharan Africa, agricultural land use change, foreign direct investment in agriculture, oil palm, Theobroma cacao, Congo Basin, export-oriented agriculture, smallholder farmers, land scarcity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review