Cited by 586Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesForest Management and Policy

Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use

Open access
Meyfroidt, Patrick, Rudel, Thomas K., Lambin, Eric F.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Reducing tropical deforestation is an international priority, given its impacts on carbon emissions and biodiversity. We examined whether recent forest transitions—a shift from net deforestation to net reforestation—involved a geographic displacement of forest clearing across countries through trade in agricultural and forest products. In most of the seven developing countries that recently experienced a forest transition, displacement of land use abroad accompanied local reforestation. Additional global land-use change embodied in their net wood trade offset 74% of their total reforested area. Because the reforesting countries continued to export more agricultural goods than they imported, this net displacement offset 22% of their total reforested area when both agriculture and forestry sectors are included. However, this net displacement increased to 52% during the last 5 y. These countries thus have contributed to a net global reforestation and/or decrease in the pressure on forests, but this global environmental benefit has been shrinking during recent years. The net decrease in the pressure on forests does not account for differences in their ecological quality. Assessments of the impacts of international policies aimed at reducing global deforestation should integrate international trade in agricultural and forest commodities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1014773107

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global market integration has increased connectivity between world regions, with regions having the highest demand for land resources often experiencing agricultural abandonment and reforestation while displacing their production needs to less developed regions.

    “Global market integration has increased connectivity between world regions, with regions having the highest demand for land resources often experiencing agricultural abandonment and reforestation while displacing their production needs to less developed regions (127), mirroring patterns from the colonial era.”

    From Used planet: a global history (2013) · cites this paper as [127]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Key Findings. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organzation; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. [6]Angelsen A, et al., editors. Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options (Center for International Forestry Research. Bogor, Indonesia: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. [35]Ollmann H. Holzbilanzen für die EU und ihre Mitgliedsländer. Hamburg, Germany: Institut für Ökonomie, Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forst und Holzwirtschaft; 2001. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyfroidt, P., Rudel, T. K., & Lambin, E. F.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Earth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research (TECLIM), Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium; Departments of
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-11-15
Volume
107
Issue
49
Pages
20917-20922
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2064672104
Cited by
586
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 38
FWCI
28.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
forest transition, tropical deforestation, reforestation, land use change, international trade, agricultural trade, timber trade, developing countries, deforestation policy, CO2 emissions, biodiversity
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Geography, Trees, Forestry, Marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review