Cited by 80Oil Palm Production and SustainabilityConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Deforestation spillovers from oil palm sustainability certification

Open access
Heilmayr, Robert, Carlson, Kimberly M, Benedict, Jason Jon·2020·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Environmental policies that impose restrictions within one location may be undermined or reinforced by ‘spillover effects,’ the movement of actors, processes, or knowledge to other locations. Such spillovers are an important consideration in the design of interventions seeking to reduce commodity driven deforestation. In these settings, global markets and mobile actors can move deforestation and conservation behaviors over large distances, complicating efforts to measure and manage spillovers. Here we quantify forest loss and conservation spillovers from the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) certification system in Indonesian Borneo (Kalimantan). We examine whether spillovers from certification are transmitted through corporate groups (i.e. to non-certified, RSPO member-held plantations) or local agricultural markets (i.e. to lands near certified mills). We find that, from 2009 to 2016, spillovers from RSPO certification reduced deforestation within Indonesia’s forest estate, but increased deforestation in areas zoned for agricultural use. The private RSPO certification system has complemented public conservation by aligning de facto land cover with central government land zoning policy. Despite these benefits, aggregate avoided deforestation attributed to direct and spillover effects was statistically and substantively insignificant when compared to the total deforestation occurring inside all of Kalimantan’s oil palm concessions. While certification has reduced illegal deforestation, stronger sector-wide action appears necessary to ensure that oil palm production is no longer a driver of forest loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7f0c

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brazil's Zero-Deforestation Cattle Agreements (CA) are one of the longest-standing examples of supply chain governance, but shortcomings in implementation have reduced their conservation impacts.

    “Brazil's Zero-Deforestation Cattle Agreements (CA) are one of the longest-standing examples of SCG but shortcomings in implementation have reduced their conservation impacts.”

    From Cattle supply chain fidelity in the Brazilian Amazon: key considerations for deforestation monitoring (2024) · cites this paper as Heilmayr et al 2020a

    The References section names studies of Brazil’s zero-deforestation cattle agreements, including one titled “Forest conservation effects of Brazil's zero deforestation cattle agreements undermined by leakage.” The passages found do not say the agreements are among the longest-standing examples of supply-chain governance or that implementation shortcomings reduced their conservation impacts; the paper’s Conclusions instead concern oil-palm certification in Indonesia. Searched for the cattle agreements, implementation shortcomings, and longevity. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Liu J Q, Hull V, Batistella M, DeFries R, Dietz T Fu F et al 2013 Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world Ecol. Soc. 18 26 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barker T, Junankar S, Pollitt H and Summerton P 2007 Carbon leakage from unilateral environmental tax reforms in europe, 1995-2005 Energy Policy 35 6281-92 · DOI
  3. Cunningham S, Bennear L S and Smith M D 2016 Spillovers in regional fisheries management: do catch shares cause leakage? Land Econ. 92 344-62 · DOI
  4. Armsworth P R, Daily G C, Kareiva P and Sanchirico J N 2006 Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 103 5403-8 · DOI
  5. Andam K S, Ferraro P J, Pfaff A, Sanchez-Azofeifa G A and Robalino J A 2008 Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 105 16089 · DOI
  6. Jayachandran S, Laat de J, Lambin E F, Stanton C Y, Audy R and Thomas N E 2017 Cash for carbon: a randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation Science 357 267-73 · DOI
  7. Alix-Garcia J M and Gibbs H K 2017 Forest conservation effects of Brazil's zero deforestation cattle agreements undermined by leakage Glob. Environ. Change 1 201-17 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Pfaff A and Robalino J 2017 Spillovers from conservation programs Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 9 299-315 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fuller C, Ondei S, Brook B W and Buettel J C 2019 First, do no harm: a systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 1 e00591 · DOI
  10. Curtis P G, Slay C M, Harris N L, Tyukavina A and Hansen M C 2018 Classifying drivers of global forest loss Science 361 1108-11 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hertel T W 2018 Economic perspectives on land use change and leakage Environ. Res. Lett. 13 075012 · DOI
  12. Lima M G B, Persson U M and Meyfroidt P 2019 Leakage and boosting effects in environmental governance: a framework for analysis Environ. Res. Lett. 14 105006 · DOI
  13. Lambin E F, Gibbs H K, Heilmayr R, Carlson K M, Fleck L C Garrett R D et al 2018 The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation Nat. Clim. Change 8 109 · DOI
  14. Garrett R D, Levy S, Carlson K M, Gardner T A, Godar J Clapp J et al 2019 Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments Glob. Environ. Change 1 135-47 · DOI
  15. Heilmayr R and Lambin E F 2016 Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113 2910-15 · DOI
  16. Carlson K M, Heilmayr R, Gibbs H K, Noojipady P, Burns D N Morton D C et al 2018 Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2 115 121-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Alix-Garcia J M, Shapiro E N and Sims K R E 2012 Forest conservation and slippage: evidence from mexico's national payments for ecosystem services program Land Econ. 88 613-38 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Robalino J, Pfaff A and Villalobos L 2017 Heterogeneous local spillovers from protected areas in costa rica J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 15 4 795-820 · DOI
  19. Nesadurai H E S 2018 New constellations of social power: states and transnational private governance of palm oil sustainability in southeast asia J. Contemp. Asia 48 204-29 · DOI
  20. Noojipady P, Morton D C, Schroeder W, Carlson K M, Huang C Gibbs H K et al 2017 Managing fire risk during drought: the influence of certification and El Niño on fire-driven forest conversion for oil palm in Southeast Asia Earth Syst. Dyn Discuss. 9 1-23 · DOI
  21. Cazzolla Gatti R, Liang J, Velichevskaya A and Zhou M 2019 Sustainable palm oil may not be so sustainable Sci. Total Environ. 20 48-51 · DOI
  22. Wu J 2000 Slippage effects of the conservation reserve program Am. J. Agric. Econ. 82 979-92 · DOI
  23. Aukland L, Costa P M and Brown S 2003 A Conceptual framework and its application for addressing leakage: the case of avoided deforestation Clim. Policy 3 123-36 · DOI
  24. Atmadja S and Verchot L 2012 A review of the state of research, policies and strategies in addressing leakage from reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 17 311-36 · DOI
  25. Gaveau D L A, Locatelli B, Salim M A, Yaen H, Pacheco P and Sheil D 2019 Rise and fall of forest loss and industrial plantations in Borneo (2000-2017) Conserv. Lett. 12 e12622 · DOI
  26. Cattau M E, Marlier M E and DeFries R 2016 Effectiveness of Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) for reducing fires on oil palm concessions in Indonesia from 2012 to 2015 Environ. Res. Lett. 11 105007 · DOI
  27. Austin K G, Schwantes A, Gu Y and Kasibhatla P S 2019 What causes deforestation in Indonesia? Environ. Res. Lett. 14 024007 · DOI
  28. Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, Ilyushchenko S, Thau D and Moore R 2017 Google earth engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone Remote Sens. Environ. 1 18-27 · DOI
  29. Hansen M C, Potapov P V, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova S A Tyukavina A et al 2013 High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change Science 15 342 850-3 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Gaveau D L A, Pirard R, Salim M A, Tonoto P, Yaen H Parks S A et al 2017 Overlapping land claims limit the use of satellites to monitor no-deforestation commitments and no-burning compliance Conserv. Lett. 10 257-64 · DOI
  31. Prabowo D, Maryudi A and Senawi Imron M A 2017 Conversion of forests into oil palm plantations in West Kalimantan, Indonesia: insights from actors' power and its dynamics For. Policy Econ. 1 32-39 · DOI
  32. Hahn J and Newey W 2004 Jackknife and analytical bias reduction for nonlinear panel models Econometrica 72 1295-319 · DOI
  33. Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P, Rueda X, Blackman A, Börner J Cerutti P O et al 2014 Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions Glob. Environ. Change 28 129-40 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Setiawan E N, Maryudi A, Purwanto R H and Lele G 2016 Opposing interests in the legalization of non-procedural forest conversion to oil palm in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia Land Policy 15 472-81 · DOI
  35. Brockhaus M, Obidzinski K, Dermawan A, Laumonier Y and Luttrell C 2012 An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+? For. Policy Econ. 1 30-37 · DOI
  36. Peluso N L and Vandergeest P 2001 Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in indonesia, malaysia, and thailand J. Asian Stud. 60 761-812 · DOI
  37. Obidzinski K and Kusters K 2015 Formalizing the logging sector in indonesia: historical dynamics and lessons for current policy initiatives Soc. Nat. Resour. 28 530-42 · DOI
  38. Schouten G and Hospes O 2018 Public and private governance in interaction: changing interpretations of sovereignty in the field of sustainable palm oil Sustainability 10 4811 · DOI
  39. Gibbs H K, Munger J, L'Roe J, Barreto P, Pereira R Christie M et al 2016 Did ranchers and slaughterhouses respond to zero-deforestation agreements in the brazilian amazon?: brazil's zero-deforestation pacts Conserv. Lett. 9 32-42 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Cullenward D and Coghlan A Structural oversupply and credibility in California's carbon market Electr. J. 29 7-14 · DOI
  41. Gaveau D L A, Kshatriya M, Sheil D, Sloan S, Molidena E Wijaya A et al 2013 Reconciling forest conservation and logging in indonesian borneo PLoS One 14 8 e69887 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heilmayr, R., Carlson, K. M., & Benedict, J. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Heilmayr, Robert
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2020-06-18
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
075002
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011888164
Cited by
80
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX16AI20G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, forest conservation, agricultural markets, corporate groups, illegal deforestation, Kalimantan, avoided deforestation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review