Cited by 151Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life

THE EVOLUTION OF STELLAR ROTATION AND THE HYDROGEN ATMOSPHERES OF HABITABLE-ZONE TERRESTRIAL PLANETS

Open access
Johnstone, C. P., Güdel, M., Stökl, A., Lammer, H., Tu, L., Kislyakova, K. G., Lüftinger, T., Odert, P. +2 more·2015·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Terrestrial planets formed within gaseous protoplanetary disks can accumulate significant hydrogen envelopes. The evolution of such an atmosphere due to XUV driven evaporation depends on the activity evolution of the host star, which itself depends sensitively on its rotational evolution, and therefore on its initial rotation rate. In this Letter, we derive an easily applicable method for calculating planetary atmosphere evaporation that combines models for a hydrostatic lower atmosphere and a hydrodynamic upper atmosphere. We show that the initial rotation rate of the central star is of critical importance for the evolution of planetary atmospheres and can determine if a planet keeps or loses its primordial hydrogen envelope. Our results highlight the need for a detailed treatment of stellar activity evolution when studying the evolution of planetary atmospheres.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2041-8205/815/1/l12

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dense stellar winds (as present in active young stars) are expected to have an adverse impact on circumstellar habitability.

    “Dense stellar winds (as present in active young stars) are also expected of having an adverse impact on circumstellar habitability (Johnstone et al. 2015).”

    From ABOUT EXOBIOLOGY: THE CASE FOR DWARF K STARS (2016) · cites this paper as Johnstone et al. 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnstone, C. P., Güdel, M., Stökl, A., Lammer, H., Tu, L., Kislyakova, K. G., Lüftinger, T., Odert, P., Erkaev, N. V., & Dorfi, E. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2015-12-08
Volume
815
Issue
1
Pages
L12
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2099354986
Cited by
151
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (S11607‐N16, P 27256, S11604-N16, S11601-N16)
  • Universität Wien
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Keywords
stellar rotation, XUV radiation, atmospheric evaporation, hydrogen envelope, terrestrial planets, habitable zone planets, protoplanetary disks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review