Cited by 24Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Metal Retention in the Solid Residue after Low-Temperature Pyrolysis of Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA)-Treated Wood

Helsen, Lieve, van den Bulck, Eric·2003·Environmental Engineering Science

Abstract

Based on previous research work, it is expected that dry recuperation of the metals in chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood waste can be achieved by low-temperature pyrolysis if a combination of pyrolysis temperature and residence time can be found, for which the two requirements: (1) zero-emission of metals, and (2) metal agglomeration are satisfied. To determine the working conditions for zero metal release, pyrolysis experiments with precisely controlled temperature and residence time and accurately known input metal concentrations of the CCA-treated wood samples, were conducted. Temperatures lower than 327°C are considered, since the release of arsenic is thought to be controlled by the reduction reaction of As2O5 to As2O3, which occurs sharply at 327°C. Metal retentions are calculated based on the measured metal concentrations in the pyrolysis residue and in the dried CCA-treated wood. The results suggest that pyrolysis at 300°C for 20 min gives rise to zero release for the three metals (Cr, Cu, and As), while pyrolysis at 320°C leads to nonnegligible metal releases. Thus, the experimental results suggest that the decomposition temperature of As2O5 is lower than 320°C. However, due to the high experimental uncertainty the observations are inconclusive. For future industrial applications, this study already shows that very careful control of process parameters will be required to ensure a zero arsenic emission. Moreover, this study indicates that an arsenic sampli…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/109287503770736087

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Helsen, L., & van den Bulck, E.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Environmental Engineering Science
Published
2003-11
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
569-580
ISSN
  • 1092-8758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9018
OpenAlex
W2122635719
Cited by
24
References
25
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Keywords
chromated copper arsenate, CCA-treated wood, low-temperature pyrolysis, metal retention, arsenic emissions, arsenate reduction, chromium, copper, wood waste, pyrolysis temperature, residence time, solid residue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review