Cited by 12Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Determinants of satisfaction with an automated alcohol evaluation program

Lieberman, Daniel Z.·2003·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

High rates of untreated mental illness cause serious health problems in the United States and worldwide. The use of computer-administered therapy has the potential to increase access to mental health care for certain patient populations. An online version of an alcohol check-up was developed that guided subjects through a series of standardized questionnaires, and provided them with feedback designed to enhance their appreciation of the negative aspects of their alcohol use. Ratings of the helpfulness of the questionnaires were evaluated in order to determine the characteristics of individuals who would potentially benefit from an automated substance abuse intervention, and to learn which aspects of an automated program would be most useful. Over a period of 25 months, 1,455 individuals participated in the study, 83% of whom had an Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score indicative of problem drinking. Subjects with alcohol problems found the on-line program more useful than other subjects. The questionnaire which compared subjects' alcohol use to national norms, provided the most helpful and also the most unexpected information. Alcohol abusers with high levels of ambivalence about their drinking and other measures of motivation for change found the program more helpful than those with lower motivation. Automated therapy made available to the general public via the Internet can be accessed by large numbers of individuals. The interaction can be useful to patients with significant levels of substance abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/109493103322725478

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lieberman, D. Z.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Lieberman, Daniel Z.
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2003-12
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
677-682
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W2057428185
Cited by
12
References
21
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
problem drinking, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, user satisfaction, motivation for change, substance use interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review