Cited by 76Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsGambling Behavior and Treatments

A review of computer-based alcohol problem services designedfor the general public

Open access
Vernon, Michael L.·2010·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

This review summarizes the literature on computer-based drinking assessment and intervention programs evaluated using members of the general public. The primary aim was to summarize the demand, usage, and effectiveness of these services. A systematic search of the literature identified seven online drinking assessments and eight computerized interventions that were evaluated using members of the general public. Internet assessment users tend to be in their early 30s, are more often male, tend to be at risk for or are experiencing alcohol-related problems, more fully explore assessment sites, and are more likely to enroll in interventions linked to these sites when their drinking problem is more severe. Although dropout from computer-based interventions is often very high and treatment models vary widely, program completers appear to show improvements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.11.001

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Web-based interventions have demonstrated efficacy for depression, anxiety disorders, alcohol and substance abuse, and insomnia.

    “The efficacy of web-based intervention has been demonstrated by a large number of trials for a number of mental health problems, including depression, anxiety disorders, alcohol and substance abuse, and insomnia (14–18).”
  • Attrition and non-adherence in standalone web-based interventions range widely, from over 95% for standalone depression sites, modest for many anxiety sites, to minimal for insomnia, depending on disorder and sampling/screening.

    “Attrition and non-adherence can also range widely, from extremely high (>95% for standalone depression sites), modest (many anxiety sites), to minimal (insomnia), depending on the disorder and how participants were sampled or screened.”
  • Standalone web-based interventions produce a wide range of outcomes: small or nonsignificant for many depression and substance abuse sites, moderate for some anxiety disorders, and fairly large for insomnia.

    “Standalone interventions have produced a wide range of outcomes, from small or nonsignificant (e.g. many depression sites, substance abuse) to moderate (some anxiety disorders) to fairly large (insomnia) (14, 15, 18, 25).”
  • Outcomes of web-based interventions vary widely, from virtually no effect to effect sizes similar to face-to-face interventions.

    “However, within this growing number of studies, the range of outcomes can vary from virtually no effect to effect sizes that are similar to face-to-face interventions.”
  • A recent review by Vernon and colleagues pinpointed reasons why users find the interventions attractive: timely, anonymous, accessible 24/7, and mostly free of charge.

    “A recent review by Vernon and colleagues [20] has pinpointed similar reasons why users themselves find the interventions attractive, that is, they are timely, anonymous, accessible 24/7, and mostly free of charge.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kennedy RS Hegerl U Bussfeld P Seemann O Conference report: Psychiatry via the Internet: benefits, risks, and perspectives 2001 Presented the First International Symposium on the Internet and Psychiatry Munich, Germany

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vernon, M. L.
Affiliations
Alcohol Research Group (US)
Corresponding author
Vernon, Michael L.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
203-211
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160407362
Cited by
76
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA007240)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
internet-delivered treatment, alcohol-related problems, general population, intervention dropout, program effectiveness, service demand
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Male, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Utilization Review, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review