Cited by 101Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Computer-assisted cognitive behavioral group therapy for social phobia

Gruber, Karin, Moran, Patrick J., Roth, Walton T., Taylor, C. Barr·2001·Behavior Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7894(01)80050-2

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruber, K., Moran, P. J., Roth, W. T., & Taylor, C. B.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, C. Barr
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
155-165
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060396480
Cited by
101
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, group cognitive behavioral therapy, computer-assisted therapy, personal digital assistants, adjunct treatment, behavioral assessment, self-report measures, positive automatic thoughts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review