Cited by 61Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and PracticesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Policy Implications Associated with the Socioeconomic and Health System Impact of Telehealth: A Case Study from Canada

Jennett, P. A., Scott, R. E., Affleck Hall, L., Hailey, D., Ohinmaa, A., Anderson, C., Thomas, R., Young, B. +1 more·2004·Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

Abstract

This research was undertaken to inform future telehealth policy directions regarding the socioeconomic impact of telehealth. Fifty-seven sources were identified and analyzed through a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases, the Internet, journals, conference proceedings, as well as personal communication with consultants in the field. The review revealed a focus on certain socioeconomic indicators such as cost, access, and satisfaction. It also identified areas of opportunity for further research and policy analysis and development (e.g., social isolation, life stress, poverty), along with various barriers and challenges to the advancement of telehealth. These included confidentiality, reimbursement, and legal and ethical considerations. To become fully integrated into the health care system, telehealth must be viewed as more than an add-on service. This paper offers 19 general and 20 subject-specific telehealth recommendations, as well as seven policy strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/153056204773644616

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jennett, P. A., Scott, R. E., Affleck Hall, L., Hailey, D., Ohinmaa, A., Anderson, C., Thomas, R., Young, B., & Lorenzetti, D.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
Published
2004-03
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
77-83
ISSN
1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001161824
Cited by
61
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
telemedicine, health policy, socio-economic impacts, health system integration, cost, health care access, patient satisfaction, social isolation, poverty, confidentiality, reimbursement, legal and ethical issues, barriers to telehealth, Canada
MeSH terms
Alberta, Health Plan Implementation, Health Policy, National Health Programs, Policy Making, Socioeconomic Factors, Program Development, Telemedicine, Organizational Case Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review