Cited by 264Health Policy Implementation ScienceTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records Systems

Readiness for Delivering Digital Health at Scale: Lessons From a Longitudinal Qualitative Evaluation of a National Digital Health Innovation Program in the United Kingdom

Open access
Lennon, Marilyn R, Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley, Devlin, Alison M, O'Connor, Siobhan, O'Donnell, Catherine, Chetty, Ula, Agbakoba, Ruth, Bikker, Annemieke +5 more·2017·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital health has the potential to support care delivery for chronic illness. Despite positive evidence from localized implementations, new technologies have proven slow to become accepted, integrated, and routinized at scale. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to examine barriers and facilitators to implementation of digital health at scale through the evaluation of a £37m national digital health program: ‟Delivering Assisted Living Lifestyles at Scale" (dallas) from 2012-2015. METHODS: The study was a longitudinal qualitative, multi-stakeholder, implementation study. The methods included interviews (n=125) with key implementers, focus groups with consumers and patients (n=7), project meetings (n=12), field work or observation in the communities (n=16), health professional survey responses (n=48), and cross program documentary evidence on implementation (n=215). We used a sociological theory called normalization process theory (NPT) and a longitudinal (3 years) qualitative framework analysis approach. This work did not study a single intervention or population. Instead, we evaluated the processes (of designing and delivering digital health), and our outcomes were the identified barriers and facilitators to delivering and mainstreaming services and products within the mixed sector digital health ecosystem. RESULTS: We identified three main levels of issues influencing readiness for digital health: macro (market, infrastructure, policy), meso (organizational), and micro (professional or public). Factors hindering implementation included: lack of information technology (IT) infrastructure, uncertainty around information governance, lack of incentives to prioritize interoperability, lack of precedence on accountability within the commercial sector, and a market perceived as difficult to navigate. Factors enabling implementation were: clinical endorsement, champions who promoted digital health, and public and professional willingness. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is receptiveness to digital health, barriers to mainstreaming remain. Our findings suggest greater investment in national and local infrastructure, implementation of guidelines for the safe and transparent use and assessment of digital health, incentivization of interoperability, and investment in upskilling of professionals and the public would help support the normalization of digital health. These findings will enable researchers, health care practitioners, and policy makers to understand the current landscape and the actions required in order to prepare the market and accelerate uptake, and use of digital health and wellness services in context and at scale.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This longitudinal qualitative evaluation of the £37m UK dallas program (2012-2015) found that readiness for digital health at scale is shaped by interacting macro-, meso-, and micro-level barriers and facilitators. Although stakeholders were receptive, mainstreaming remained hindered by infrastructure, information governance, interoperability, market, organizational, professional, and public-readiness issues.

Key findings

  • Readiness issues were present at three levels: macro (market, policy/government, wider context), meso (commercial, organizational, infrastructure), and micro (professional, public, carers).
  • Factors hindering implementation included lack of IT infrastructure, uncertainty around information governance, lack of incentives to prioritize interoperability, lack of precedence on accountability within the commercial sector, and a market perceived as difficult to navigate.
  • Factors enabling implementation included clinical endorsement, champions who promoted digital health, and public and professional willingness.
  • The authors conclude with 10 recommendations, including greater investment in national and local infrastructure, guidelines for safe and transparent use and assessment of digital health, incentivizing interoperability, and upskilling professionals and the public.

Methods

  • Longitudinal qualitative, multi-stakeholder implementation study over 39 months (June 2012-October 2015) evaluating the £37m national dallas program (2012-2015).
  • Data included interviews (n=125), focus groups (n=7), project meetings (n=12), field work or observation (n=16), health professional survey responses (n=48), and cross-program documentary evidence (n=215); analysis used normalization process theory (NPT) and a longitudinal framework approach.
  • Sampling included key implementers, consumers and patients, health professionals, industry, voluntary sector, and government across England and Scotland; one community (Living It Up) was also studied as a case study.

Limitations

  • Stated: qualitative data collection was largely limited to those engaging with the dallas program; the study did not include individuals or organizations unable or unwilling to engage, which could have provided different perspectives on digital exclusion or nonparticipation.
  • Stated: the research was located in 2 countries within the United Kingdom with a free-at-point-of-access NHS, funding constraints, and a long history of digitalization, important when comparing with less digitally advanced countries.
  • Stated: NPT could result in inappropriate “shoe horning” of data, though the authors argue they were rigorous in looking for data outside the framework; evident from the design: the work did not study a single intervention or population, and its outcomes were identified barriers and facilitators rather than clinical effectiveness.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.6900

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Readiness issues for digital health are present at three levels: macro (market, policy/governmental, wider context), meso (commercial, organizational, infrastructure), and micro (professional, public, carers).

    “We identified three main levels of issues influencing readiness for digital health: macro (market, infrastructure, policy), meso (organizational), and micro (professional or public).”
    • Also stated in: § Analysis and Coding Scheme · plain
      “Our analysis revealed that readiness issues were present at 3 levels (Figure 1): Macro (market, policy or governmental, wider context), meso (commercial, organizational, and infrastructure), and micro (professional, public, carers).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Lack of information technology (IT) infrastructure hindered implementation of digital health.

    “Factors hindering implementation included: lack of information technology (IT) infrastructure, uncertainty around information governance, lack of incentives to prioritize interoperability, lack of precedence on accountability within the commercial sector, and a market perceived as difficult to navigate.”
    • Also stated in: § Macro-Level Readiness · plain
      “Our data showed significant variation in national infrastructure across the United Kingdom. Those in remote and rural areas voiced concerns about inadequate Internet connectivity as a limiting factor for accessing digital health services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Uncertainty around information governance hindered implementation of digital health.

    “Factors hindering implementation included: lack of information technology (IT) infrastructure, uncertainty around information governance, lack of incentives to prioritize interoperability, lack of precedence on accountability within the commercial sector, and a market perceived as difficult to navigate.”
    • Also stated in: § Macro-Level Readiness · plain
      “Information governance policies and legislation issues within the health and social care sectors were a recurring theme.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The digital health market proved difficult to access and navigate, especially for international companies or start-ups unfamiliar with the landscape.

    “The digital health market proved difficult to access and navigate especially for international companies or start-ups unfamiliar with the landscape.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Once accreditation or endorsement was achieved, it was perceived as a potential facilitator of uptake.

    “This was because endorsement by the relevant medical association was seen as a prerequisite to ensure uptake by lay users and health professionals; obtaining such accreditation was labor and time intensive and posed a barrier for implementation but once accreditation or endorsement was achieved, this was perceived as a potential facilitator of uptake.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 48
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Obtaining accreditation for the eRedBook was labor and time intensive and posed a barrier for implementation.

    “This was because endorsement by the relevant medical association was seen as a prerequisite to ensure uptake by lay users and health professionals; obtaining such accreditation was labor and time intensive and posed a barrier for implementation but once accreditation or endorsement was achieved, this was perceived as a potential facilitator of uptake.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Companies often wanted to sell a technology kit, whereas the statutory sector wanted a contract linking the use of technology to data services and outcomes.

    “Companies often wanted to sell a ‟technology kit,” whereas the statutory sector wanted a different type of ‟contract,” linking the use of technology to data services and outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Commercial companies often perceive open standards and interoperability as a threat to their business model, because interoperability was not a priority compared with increasing their own individual market share.

    “Commercial companies often perceive open standards and interoperability as a threat to their business model, since it was not a priority in comparison with efforts to increase their own individual market share as the market develops and matures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Companies were reluctant to take on risk until it was clear what the ethical guidelines and responsibilities were around collection and use of lifestyle data, and this was another barrier to implementation.

    “This was a risk which companies were reluctant to take on in the current market until it was clear what the ethical guidelines and responsibilities were around collection and use of lifestyle data and was another barrier to implementation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Although policy and legislation relating to data sharing has been reviewed and clear recommendations made, this has not yet translated to local contexts and was reported as a key barrier to deployment of the dallas program.

    “Although policy and legislation relating to data sharing has been reviewed and clear recommendations made [36], this has not yet translated to local contexts and was reported as a key barrier to deployment of the dallas program across its lifetime.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] HealthDGov.UK20132017-02-03Caldicott Review: information governance in health and care system, Information: To share or not to share? https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/192572/2900774_InfoGovernance_accv2.pdf

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The UK digital health market is challenging to navigate, with a lack of clear access or entry points for the retail sectors.

    “All of this makes the UK digital health market challenging to navigate, with a lack of clear access or entry points for the retail sectors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Accessing Twitter or similar sites using hospital computer systems was often not permissible, which meant that integrating social networking platforms within the health care arena was problematic.

    “For example, accessing ‟Twitter” or similar sites using hospital computer systems was often not permissible, which meant that integrating social networking platforms within the health care arena was problematic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    There was a common view that information governance regulations were not currently fit for purpose.

    “This led to a common view that information governance regulations were not currently ‟fit for purpose.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Providing self-monitoring devices as part of health promotion was deemed acceptable, but providing clinical data back to those with known health problems was perceived as a different proposition involving significant risk.

    “Providing self-monitoring devices as part of health promotion was deemed acceptable but providing clinical data back to those with known health problems was perceived as a different proposition, involving significant risk.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Recent social benefits reforms encouraged many individuals to improve their computer literacy by joining Lay and Digital champion programs and to engage with digital hubs so they could access their social welfare benefits.

    “This encouraged many individuals to improve their computer literacy by joining ‟Lay” and ‟Digital champion” programs and to engage with digital hubs so they could access their social welfare benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    As a result of digital enablement activities, disadvantaged groups potentially at risk of digital exclusion were provided with digital skills and educated about health technologies.

    “As a result, disadvantaged groups potentially at risk of digital exclusion were provided with digital skills and educated about health technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Recent social benefits reforms compelled people to sign on the Web.

    “For example, the experience from digital enablement activities suggested that recent social benefits reforms compelled people ‟to sign on the Web.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The time and effort required for codesign created real challenges, introduced delays, and reduced the time available to develop and deploy new solutions within the defined timescale of the program.

    “However, the time and effort required for this created real challenges, as it introduced delays and consequently reduced the time available to develop and deploy new solutions within the defined timescale of the program.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Each new implementation site had to go through its own deployment pain-barrier, with ad-hoc local solutions providing little insight on what to expect elsewhere.

    “Practically this meant that each new implementation site had to go through its own deployment ‟pain-barrier,” with ad-hoc local solutions providing little insight on what to expect elsewhere.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Workload pressures and lack of capacity was a recurring barrier to incorporating new technologies into everyday working practices, and incentivization had to be used to overcome this on occasion.

    “Workload pressures and lack of capacity was a recurring barrier to incorporating new technologies into everyday working practices and on occasion incentivization had to be used to overcome this.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A lack of senior management buy-in was cited as a barrier to organizational readiness for digital health, which could negatively affect implementation efforts.

    “a lack of senior management buy-in was also cited as a barrier to organizational readiness for digital health, which could negatively affect implementation efforts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The target market ranged from younger consumers who were more adept, confident, and ready to use digital tools through to some older adults with little or no previous awareness or understanding of basic IT.

    “The target market ranged from younger consumers—who were more adept, confident, and ready to use digital tools—through to some older adults with little or no previous awareness or understanding of basic IT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The issue of individual agency arose as people lead busy lives with competing career and family responsibilities, as well as financial and social demands, which were often prioritized ahead of health.

    “The issue of individual ‟agency” arose as people lead busy lives with competing career and family responsibilities, as well as—for some—financial and social demands, which were often prioritized ahead of health.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Smaller organizations such as consortia of primary care practices were able to be more flexible and more responsive to opportunities presented by dallas communities.

    “Thus, smaller organizations such as consortia of primary care practices were able to be more flexible and more responsive to opportunities presented by dallas communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Problems at the executive level within larger health trusts contrasted with readiness of smaller, more flexible organizations such as general practices, which seemed more receptive to adopting digital health services to large patient groups.

    “Problems at the executive level within larger health trusts were contrasted with readiness of smaller, more flexible organizations such as general practices, which seemed more receptive to adopting digital health services to large patient groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Despite reported growing use of digital tablets and smartphones among the general population, many people still lacked basic access to such mobile devices.

    “Despite reported growing use of digital tablets and smartphones among the general population, many people still lacked basic access to such mobile devices.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The main barrier was not a fear of role replacement, but lack of knowledge and skills in relation to digital health, which significantly affected how prepared some were to engage with the different technologies.

    “However, the main barrier was not a fear of role replacement, but lack of knowledge and skills in relation to digital health which significantly affected how prepared some were to engage with the different technologies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some nurses worried that personal information may not be kept confidential and secure or could be sold or shared with commercial companies without the explicit consent or knowledge of patients.

    “Some nurses worried that personal information may not be kept confidential and secure or could be sold or shared with commercial companies without the explicit consent or knowledge of patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Interoperability problems limited the effectiveness of many new digital platforms and required workarounds by health care staff and end users to ensure benefits could still be exploited locally.

    “This limited the effectiveness of many of the new digital platforms and required workarounds by health care staff and end users to ensure the benefits could still be exploited locally.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some health organizations had not yet fully developed their own digital strategies and/or had not yet bought in fully to the self-care agenda at the time of the program.

    “Some health organizations had not yet fully developed their own digital strategies and/or had not yet bought in fully to the self-care agenda at the time of the program.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    There was a perception by those tasked with driving forward new initiatives that clinicians and others feared digital health as they believed it could be used to disempower and in some cases replace them as care providers.

    “There was a perception by those tasked with driving forward new initiatives that clinicians and others feared digital health as they believed it could be used to disempower and in some cases replace them as care providers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Budget constraints were visible among some partners who struggled with manpower capacity and to provide mobile technology and other equipment for their health care staff to roll out digital health products and services, which was a major impediment to progressing the digital health consumer agenda.

    “Budget constraints were clearly visible among some partners who struggled with manpower capacity and to provide mobile technology and other equipment for their health care staff to roll out different digital health products and services, which was a major impediment to progressing the digital health ‟consumer” agenda.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Given that many digital health initiatives have come and gone over the years and failed to be integrated into routine care in the UK health service, some health professionals were skeptical about the likely longevity of the dallas program and were slow to engage with the technologies it was promoting.

    “Also, given that many digital health initiatives have come and gone over the years and failed to be integrated into routine care in the UK health service, some health professionals were skeptical about the likely longevity of the dallas program and were slow to engage with the technologies it was promoting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The health service and other organizations frequently had to contend with major resource constraints during the current period of financial austerity, which affected ability to engage with various initiatives within dallas.

    “The health service and other organizations frequently had to contend with major resource constraints during the current period of financial austerity, which affected ability to engage with various initiatives within dallas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The pace of technological change was noted as a problem as clinicians felt unable to keep up to date with new and emerging developments, especially the growth and lack of regulation within the mobile app market.

    “The pace of technological change was also noted as a problem as clinicians felt unable to keep up to date with new and emerging developments, especially the growth and lack of regulation within the mobile app market.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Technologies which required data entry and/or a change in daily routines affected the readiness of users to adopt these and proved another challenge for the preventive self-care agenda.

    “Technologies which required data entry and/or a change in daily routines affected the ‟readiness” of users to adopt these and this proved another challenge for the preventive self-care agenda.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The dallas program highlighted challenges but also potential solutions to the large scale implementation of digital health, for example, through the development of information governance recommendations for health care organizations and the use of digital champions to address skill deficiencies.

    “The dallas program highlighted challenges but also potential solutions to the large scale implementation of digital health, for example, through the development of information governance recommendations for health care organizations [45] and the use of digital champions to address skill deficiencies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] ChittyAHSJ201506222017-02-03Health Services JournalMake people the controllers of their data to help the NHS go digital http://www.hsj.co.uk/5086634.article#.VYkov2jF99d

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Our work suggests that the health care community would welcome better integration of health records, although persistent challenges are posed by the way current information governance rules are interpreted and enacted.

    “Our work suggests that the health care community would welcome better integration of health records, although persistent challenges are posed by the way current information governance rules are interpreted and enacted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although there is much rhetoric about the consumer push for digital health, our research raises outstanding issues relating to the readiness for digital health that need attention.

    “Although there is much rhetoric about the consumer push for digital health, our research raises some outstanding issues relating to the readiness for digital health that need attention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The dallas program has shown that although such issues persist across a range of digital health initiatives, more user centered design techniques, intensive engagement, and support of users and incentivization of professionals can help increase interest in digital health.

    “Importantly the dallas program has shown that although such issues persist across a range of digital health initiatives more user centered design techniques, intensive engagement, and support of users and incentivization of professionals can help increase interest in digital health.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Uptake and adoption of digital health are slow overall, and sociotechnical, organizational, or cultural barriers slow the mainstreaming of digital health.

    “Despite positive evidence from localized implementations, new technologies have proven slow to become accepted, integrated, and routinized at scale.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
      “Previous research, however, has shown that uptake and adoption are slow for digital health overall and that there may be many sociotechnical, organizational, or cultural barriers that are slowing the mainstreaming of digital health [1,2].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Jennett, PA, 2001, Comput Methods Programs Biomed source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing evidence on eHealth readiness mainly relates to organizational readiness within the health service or the readiness of health professionals, patients, or carers for a specific single digital health service.

    “However, the existing evidence mainly relates to organizational readiness within the health service [17,18] or the readiness of health professionals [19-21], patients or carers for a specific single digital health service [22].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [17] May, C, 2003, Soc Sci Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] Greenhalgh, T, 2014, Health Services and Delivery Research source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] Greenhalgh, T, 2010, Br Med J source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Prior literature identifies barriers to digital health implementation including liability concerns, interoperability issues, costs, usability, misaligned incentives, policy problems, and acceptability to patients and professionals.

    “Issues that have been identified as barriers to implementation range from liability concerns, interoperability issues, costs, usability, misaligned incentives, and policy problems through to acceptability to patients and professionals [4,8].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Although there is receptiveness to digital health, barriers to mainstreaming remain.

    “Although there is receptiveness to digital health, barriers to mainstreaming remain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The dallas program and its findings are sufficiently representative of national digital health innovation ecosystems to support lessons about readiness for digital health at scale beyond the program.
    • Rests on an assumption: The barriers and facilitators identified in the dallas program are relevant to digital health implementation internationally.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Anonymity was protected by use of generic descriptors throughout.

    “Anonymity was protected by use of generic descriptors throughout.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Care was taken to include representatives from all types of organizations involved (private, public, voluntary) and stakeholders at strategic, project management, and service design and delivery levels.

    “Care was taken to include representatives from all types of organizations involved (private, public, voluntary) and to include stakeholders involved at the strategic level, the project management level, and the service design and delivery level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Eight researchers with multidisciplinary experience were involved at coding clinics, with one or two senior academics involved in all coding sessions.

    “A total of 8 researchers with multidisciplinary experience in health services research, clinical research, informatics, and social science were involved at coding clinics with 1 or 2 senior academics (FSM, MML) involved in all coding sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    University ethical approvals were granted for the collection of all qualitative data reported.

    “University ethical approvals were granted for the collection of all qualitative data reported”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The e-HIT tool was developed in previous research by members of the team and is designed to help promote understanding of digital health implementation issues.

    “This tool was developed in previous research by members of the team [28] and is designed to help promote understanding of digital health implementation issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Informed consent to participation was gained from all participants.

    “Informed consent to participation was gained from all participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The work was overseen by an external advisory group.

    “Our work was overseen by an external advisory group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Coding clinics were undertaken to ensure consistency of coding and shared understanding of coding constructs.

    “Coding clinics were undertaken to ensure consistency of coding and shared understanding of coding constructs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Care was taken to expand, collapse, and rename codes so that all were confident the coding book was a fair and accurate reflection of the data.

    “Care was taken to expand, collapse, and rename codes so that all were confident that the coding book was a fair and accurate reflection of the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded with participant consent, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized.

    “Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded with participant consent, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The efforts required to implement and manage changes are less complex and costly for smaller organizations.

    “Naturally, the efforts required to implement and manage changes are also less complex and costly for smaller organizations”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The UK government has recognized the digital skills issue and vowed to make fast broadband available to every home, but our findings suggest this will still leave much to do.

    “The UK government has recognized this issue and vowed to make fast broadband available to every home [39] but our findings suggest this will still leave much to do.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Department of CultureGov.UK20132017-02-03Broadband Delivery UK https://www.gov.uk/guidance/broadband-delivery-uk

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Interoperability is a key aim in the United Kingdom as it strives to implement digital standards and achieve system wide interoperability, but others have reported interoperability as a barrier to implementation and large scale deployments of mHealth and global health interventions.

    “Interoperability is a key aim in the United Kingdom as it strives to implement digital standards and achieve system wide interoperability but others have reported interoperability as a barrier to implementation and large scale deployments of mHealth and global health interventions [40,41].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [40] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    A robust sociological theory-NPT-underpinned the evaluation as recommended good practice.

    “A robust, sociological theory—NPT—underpinned the evaluation as recommended as good practice [32,33].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [32] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [33] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Consumer adoption of digital health is seen as a great market opportunity with numerous policy drivers and yet penetration of this large potential market remains relatively poor.

    “Consumer adoption of digital health is seen as a great market opportunity with numerous policy drivers and yet penetration of this large potential market remains relatively poor [37].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] Gov.UK2015092017-02-03Digital Health in the UK: An industry study for the Office of Life Sciences https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/461479/BIS-15-544-digital-health-in-the-uk-an-industry-study-for-the-Office-of-Life-Sciences.pdf

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Digital skill and infrastructure deficiencies have been noted by a recent select committee report on digital skills for 2014-2015 that examined challenges for a digital economy more broadly.

    “Our findings resonate with reports and data from other sources, for example, digital skill and infrastructure deficiencies have been noted by a recent select committee report on digital skills for 2014-2015 [38] that examined challenges for a ‟digital economy” more broadly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Publications.parliament20152017-02-03Make or Break the UKs Digital Future https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/lddigital/111/111.pdf

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Clinical endorsement of digital health products and services including systems for regulation and accreditation of technology and data enabled services is required and has been suggested previously, and a recent systematic review has suggested this is a key issue.

    “Clinical endorsement of digital health products and services including systems for regulation and accreditation of technology and data enabled services is required and has been suggested previously [42], and a recent systematic review of the international literature on barriers and facilitators to patient and public involvement with digital health has suggested this is a key issue [43].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [42] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The research was located in 2 countries within the United Kingdom which operate a NHS system where health care is free at the point of access and there are funding constraints, which is important when considering the implications of this work.

    “Our research was located in 2 countries within the United Kingdom which operate a NHS system where health care is free at the point of access and there are funding constraints which is important to note when considering the implications of this work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Clinical endorsement and validation was seen as one way to address trust concerns and promote uptake and utilization among consumer groups.

    “Clinical endorsement and validation was seen as one way to address this and promote uptake and utilization among consumer groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study rigorously collected and analyzed process data from a wide range of stakeholders involved in the implementation, identifying not only potential barriers, but also why these occur and how to address them in future.

    “We have rigorously collected and analyzed process data from a wide range of stakeholders involved in the implementation, identifying not only potential barriers, but also why these occur and how to address them in future (Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These readiness issues are not insurmountable challenges but their existence does need to be acknowledged and addressed if deployment at scale to the widest population is to be realized.

    “These issues are not insurmountable challenges but their existence does need to be acknowledged and addressed if deployment at scale to the widest population is to be realized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is a need to deploy digital health at scale to the widest population.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Our whole system view of the digital health ecosystem suggests that interoperability is not a technical issue but rather due to industry inertia and to multiple organizations operating within the health system in the United Kingdom.

    “Our whole system view of the digital health ecosystem provides potential explanations, suggesting that interoperability is not a technical issue but rather due to industry inertia and to multiple organizations operating within the health system in the United Kingdom.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Qualitative data collection was largely limited to those engaging with the dallas program; the study did not undertake work with individuals or organizations that were unable or unwilling to engage, which could have provided different perspectives and possibly shed light on digital exclusion or nonparticipation.

    “Our qualitative data collection was largely limited to those engaging with the dallas program and we did not undertake work with individuals or organizations that were unable or unwilling to engage with the program, which could have provided different perspectives and possibly shed light on digital exclusion or nonparticipation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The authors were rigorous in looking for data that fell outside the NPT framework, despite the risk of inappropriate shoe horning of data.

    “This could result in inappropriate ‟shoe horning” of data, however, we would argue that we were rigorous in looking for data that also fell outside the framework.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The recent European Union (EU) Task Force on eHealth acknowledged the need to develop EU-wide standards on interoperability and data sharing.

    “The recent European Union (EU) Task Force on eHealth also acknowledged the need to develop EU-wide standards on interoperability and data sharing [26].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Ec.europa20142017-02-03LuxembourgEU Task Force on eHealthEU Task Force on eHealth: Redesigning health in Europe for 2020 https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/eu-task-force-ehealth-redesigning-health-europe-2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Previous research relating to the use of personal electronic health records has demonstrated less public and professional appetite than anticipated.

    “Previous research relating to the use of personal electronic health records has demonstrated less public and professional appetite than anticipated [22,44].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Greenhalgh, T, 2010, Br Med J source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the 10 key recommendations are addressed, they will promote the right market and environment to permit the routine deployment and true scaling-up of digital health and wellness technologies and services.

    “If addressed, these recommendations will promote the right market and environment to permit the routine deployment and true scaling-up of digital health and wellness technologies and services.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is a need to deploy digital health at scale to the widest population.
66 of 66
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The dallas program and its findings are sufficiently representative of national digital health innovation ecosystems to support lessons about readiness for digital health at scale beyond the program.

    “These findings will enable researchers, health care practitioners, and policy makers to understand the current landscape and the actions required in order to prepare the market and accelerate uptake, and use of digital health and wellness services in context and at scale.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The barriers and facilitators identified in the dallas program are relevant to digital health implementation internationally.

    “such work is timely and has the potential to make an important contribution to understanding the implementation of digital health innovations internationally.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a need to deploy digital health at scale to the widest population.

    “if deployment at scale to the widest population is to be realized”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The dallas program is a suitable case for drawing lessons about national digital health innovation programs.

    “We have examined the implementation journey of a national program aiming to deliver digital health at scale across the United Kingdom.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of validation of novel digital health solutions through early and continuous user involvement is often underestimated by the industry, hospitals, and governments.

    “The importance of validation of novel digital health solutions through early and continuous user involvement is often underestimated by the industry, hospitals, and governments [55].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1097/01.jcn.0000338930.89210.79 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lennon, M. R., Bouamrane, M.-M., Devlin, A. M., O'Connor, S., O'Donnell, C., Chetty, U., Agbakoba, R., Bikker, A., Grieve, E., Finch, T., Watson, N., Wyke, S., & Mair, F. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Mair, Frances S
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2017-02-16
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
e42
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2588144700
Cited by
264
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 3
FWCI
33.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
Innovate UK
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
digital health implementation, scale-up, barriers and facilitators, Normalization Process Theory, assisted living, chronic care, interoperability, information governance, health IT infrastructure, professional readiness, health policy
MeSH terms
Evaluation Studies as Topic, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, National Health Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review