The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gap Junctions and Cancer: New Functions for an Old Story
Abstract
Cancer was one of the first pathologies to be associated with gap-junction defect. Despite the evidence accumulated over the last 40-year period, the molecular involvement of gap junctions and their structural proteins (connexins) in cancer has not been elucidated. The lack of a satisfying explanation may come from the complexity of the disease, evolving through various stages during tumor progression, with cancer cells exhibiting different phenotypes. Here, the question of the involvement of gap junctions has been readdressed by considering the connexin expression/function level at different fundamental stages of carcinogenesis (cell proliferation, cell invasion, and cancer cell dissemination). By performing this analysis, it becomes clear that gap junctions are probably differently involved, depending on the stage of the cancer progression considered. In particular, the most recent data suggest that connexins may act on cell growth by controlling gene expression through a variety of processes (independent of or dependent on the gap-junctional communication capacity). During invasion, connexins have been demonstrated to enhance adherence of cancer cells to the stroma, migration, and probably their dissemination by establishing communication with the endothelial barrier. All these data present a complex picture of connexins in various functions, depending on the cell phenotype.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nagasawa, K., Chiba, H., Fujita, H., Kojima, T., Saito, T., Endo, T., & Sawada, N. (2006) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.20647 · Cited by 255
Cited by
Connexin43 phosphorylation: structural changes and biological effects
Solan, J. L., & Lampe, P. D. (2009) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20082319 · Cited by 555
Trepat, X., Chen, Z., & Jacobson, K. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c110012 · Cited by 406
Gap junctions and cancer: communicating for 50 years
Aasen, T., Mesnil, M., Naus, C. C., Lampe, P. D., & Laird, D. W. (2016) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.105 · Cited by 369
Self-citationAnalysis of gap junctional intercellular communications using a dielectrophoresis-based microchip
Tellez-Gabriel, M., Charrier, C., Brounais-Le Royer, B., Mullard, M., Brown, H. K., Verrecchia, F., & Heymann, D. (2017) · European Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2017.01.003 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronier, L., Crespin, S., Strale, P.-O., Defamie, N., & Mesnil, M.
- Venue
- Antioxidants & Redox Signaling
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 323-338
- ISSN
- 1523-0864 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7716
- OpenAlex
- W2039606117
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gap Junctions and Cancer: New Functions for an Old Story. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ars.2008.2153
- The paper
- Cronier, L., Crespin, S., Strale, P.-O., Defamie, N., & Mesnil, M. (2009). Gap Junctions and Cancer: New Functions for an Old Story. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2008.2153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.