Cited by 193Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDisability Education and EmploymentFamily and Disability Support Research

Mapping the Autistic Advantage from the Accounts of Adults Diagnosed with Autism: A Qualitative Study

Open access
Russell, Ginny, Kapp, Steven K., Elliott, Daisy, Elphick, Chris, Gwernan-Jones, Ruth, Owens, Christabel·2019·Autism in Adulthood

Abstract

Background: Autism has been associated with specific cognitive strengths. Strengths and weaknesses have traditionally been conceptualized as dichotomous. Methods: We conducted 28 semi-structured interviews with autistic adults. Maximum variation sampling was used to ensure diversity in relation to support needs. We asked which personal traits adults attributed to their autism, and how these have helped in the workplace, in relationships, and beyond. Data were collected in two stages. Responses were analyzed using content and thematic techniques. Results: The ability to hyperfocus, attention to detail, good memory, and creativity were the most frequently described traits. Participants also described specific qualities relating to social interaction, such as honesty, loyalty, and empathy for animals or for other autistic people. In thematic analysis we found that traits associated with autism could be experienced either as advantageous or disadvantageous dependent on moderating influences. Moderating influences included the social context in which behaviors occurred, the ability to control behaviors, and the extent to which traits were expressed. Conclusions: Separating autistic strengths from weaknesses may be a false dichotomy if traits cannot be isolated as separate constructs of strengths or deficits. If attempts to isolate problematic traits from advantageous traits are ill conceived, there may be implications for interventions that have reduction in autistic traits as a primary outcome measure. Lay Summary: Why was this study done?: The study was done to find out what autistic adults could tell us about their own abilities. They told us about their abilities and how these abilities had helped them in their everyday lives: at work, in their relationships with other people, and at home. What was the purpose of this study?: To tell a story about what aspects of their autism adults thought were of benefit, when going about their daily lives. What did the researchers do?: The researchers interviewed 24 adults who had an autism diagnosis. Some lived in residential care and others lived alone in rented apartments. Some people were interviewed twice. Most people said they enjoyed the experience of being interviewed. Once the interviews were done, they were typed up and the researchers tried to figure out what were the common themes over all the stories they had heard. They thought about the themes, then did some more interviews with autistic adults to check they were on the right lines. After discussing them, they wrote the story. What were the results of the study?: Hyper focus, attention to detail, and the ability to remember were the abilities that autistic people said benefitted them most often. But autistic adults who were interviewed said although their autistic traits were sometimes helpful, at other times they hindered their progress. So the same trait might be useful in some circumstances and unhelpful in other situations. For example, hypersensitivity led one person to enjoy nature, but was difficult to cope with in crowded streets. The study highlights this interchangeability. What do these findings add to what was already known?: Before, autistic people were known to have both strengths and challenges, but studies tended to separate autistic strengths and weaknesses as different things. We theorize that some traits are expressed as behaviors that may serve to improve or hinder autistic people's progress, but this depends on their situation (context). What are potential weaknesses in the study?: Because the researchers used interviews, they did not include any nonverbal autistic people in the study. How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?: It could be useful to think about autism in a way that does not focus on deficits and this study will help us to do that. Plus, if an autistic trait can give people an advantage or a disadvantage, interventions aimed at reducing autistic behaviors might risk dampening advantageous traits as they seek to help with difficulties. That means, autistic adults and children might lose useful abilities when and if they are treated for traits that can also be problematic. The researchers hope their study will lead to more discussion about these types of ideas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/aut.2018.0035

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autistic traits can be strengths, challenges, or neutral depending on context.

    “autistic traits can be strengths, challenges, or neutral depending on context (and are often deeply valued by autistic people ourselves; Russell et al. [41]).”

    From Lobbying Autism's Diagnostic Revision in the DSM-5 (2020) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Results (Themes) and Discussion say the same autistic trait can be advantageous or disadvantageous depending on social context and other influences. The Introduction also describes autistic adults valuing traits associated with autism. Our copy does not establish the claim that traits can be neutral. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Mottron L Changing perceptions: The power of autism. Nature. 2011; 479: 33– 35 22051659
  2. [2]Pellicano E, Stears M Bridging autism, science and society: Moving toward an ethically informed approach to autism research. Autism Res. 2011; 4(4): 271– 282 21567986
  3. [4]Murray S Representing Autism: Culture, Narrative, Fascination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008
  4. [5]Sinclair J Don't Mourn for Us. Autonomy, The Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies. 2012; 1(1): 1– 4. http://www.larry-arnold.net/Autonomy/index.php/autonomy/article/view/AR1 (last accessed 1 29, 2018)
  5. [6]Sinclair J Why I Dislike “Person First” Language. Autonomy, The Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies. 2013; 1(2). http://www.larry-arnold.net/Autonomy/index.php/autonomy/article/view/OP1 (last accessed 1 30, 2018)
  6. [7]O'Neil S The meaning of autism: Beyond disorder. Disabil Soc. 2008; 23(7): 787– 799
  7. [9]Kapp SK, Gillespie-Lynch K, Sherman LE, Hutman T Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Dev Psychol. 2013; 49(1): 59– 71 22545843
  8. [11]Gernsbacher MA, Dawson M, Mottron L Autism: Common, heritable, but not harmful. Behav Brain Sci. 2006; 29(4): 413– 414 25506106 PMC4263218
  9. [12]Shah A, Frith U An islet of ability in autistic children: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1983; 24(4): 613– 620 6630333
  10. [13]Shah A, Frith U Why do autistic individuals show superior performance on the block design task? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1993; 34(8): 1351– 1364 8294523
  11. [14]Mottron L, Bouvet L, Bonnel A, et al. Veridical mapping in the development of exceptional autistic abilities. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013; 37(2): 209– 228 23219745
  12. [15]Dawson M, Soulières I, Gernsbacher MA, Mottron L The level and nature of autistic intelligence. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18(8): 657– 662 17680932 PMC4287210
  13. [19]Davidson J Autistic culture online: Virtual communication and cultural expression on the spectrum. Soc Cult Geogr. 2008; 9(7): 791– 806
  14. [20]Davidson J “It cuts both ways”: A relational approach to access and accommodation for autism. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2010; 70(2): 305– 312 19883964
  15. [21]Davidson J, Henderson VL “Travel in parallel with us for a while”: Sensory geographies of autism. Can Georgr. 2010; 54(4): 462– 475
  16. [22]Baird G, Cass H, Slonims V Diagnosis of autism. BMJ. 2003; 327: 488– 493 12946972 PMC188387
  17. [23]Russell G, Mandy W, Elliott D, White R, Pittwood T, Ford T Selection bias on intellectual ability in autism research: a cross-sectional review and meta-analysis. Mol Autism. 2019; 10(1): 9 30867896 PMC6397505
  18. [27]McGuire AE Buying time: The S/pace of advocacy and the cultural production of autism. Can J Dis Stud. 2013; 2(3): 98– 125
  19. [29]Russell G, Starr S, Elphick C, Rodogno R, Singh I Selective patient and public involvement: The promise and perils of pharmaceutical intervention for autism. Health Expect. 2017; 21(2): 466– 473 29090494 PMC5867326
  20. [30]Barnes RE, McCabe H Should we welcome a cure for autism? A survey of the arguments. Med Health Care Philos. 2012; 15(3): 255– 269 21837546
  21. [31]Bölte S Is autism curable? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014; 56(10): 927– 931 24840630
  22. [32]Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin E, Ashwin C, Tavassoli T, Chakrabarti B (2011). The paradox of autism: Why does disability sometimes give rise to talent? In: Kapur N, ed. The Paradoxical Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011; 274– 288
  23. [33]Mottron L, Belleville S, Rouleau GA, Collignon O Linking neocortical, cognitive, and genetic variability in autism with alterations of brain plasticity: The Trigger-Threshold-Target model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014; 47: 735– 752 25155242
  24. [34]Happé F Why are savant skills and special talents associated with autism? World Psychiatry. 2018; 17(3): 280– 281 30192091 PMC6127767
  25. [36]Eigsti I-M, Fein DA More is less: Pitch discrimination and language delays in children with optimal outcomes from autism. Autism Res. 2013; 6(6): 605– 613 23929787 PMC3869875
  26. [37]Williams S Is anybody there? Critical realism, chronic illness and the disability debate. Sociol Health Illn. 1999; 21(6): 797– 819
  27. [40]Abbott D Who says what, where, why and how? Doing real-world research with disabled children, young people and family members. In: Curran DT, Runswick-Cole DK, eds. Disabled Children's Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013
  28. [42]Craig J, Baron-Cohen S Creativity and imagination in autism and asperger syndrome. J Autism Dev Dis. 1999; 29(4): 319– 326 10478731
  29. [43]Liu M-J, Shih W-L, Ma L-Y Are children with Asperger syndrome creative in divergent thinking and feeling? A brief report. Res Autism Spectr Dis. 2011; 5(1): 294– 298
  30. [44]Yafai A-F, Verrier D, Reidy L Social conformity and autism spectrum disorder: A child-friendly take on a classic study. Autism. 2014; 18(8): 1007– 1013 24126871
  31. [46]Jones E, Johnson MH A revolution for the at-risk. Psychologist. 2016; 29(12): 912– 917
  32. [47]Lamb JA, Parr JR, Bailey AJ, Monaco AP Autism: In search of susceptibility genes. Neuromolecular Med. 2002; 2(1): 11– 28 12230302
  33. [50]Nicolaidis C What can physicians learn from the neurodiversity movement? Virtual Mentor. 2012; 14(6): 503– 510 23351267
  34. [51]Johnson KR, Bagatell N “No! You can't have it”: Problematizing choice in institutionalized adults with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil. 2018 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1177/1744629518766121 29621910 · DOI
  35. [52]Avery DM Talking “tragedy”: Identity issues in the parental story of disability. In: Corker M, French S, eds. Disability Discourse. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press; 1999; 116– 126
  36. [53]Norbury CF, Sparks A Difference or disorder? Cultural issues in understanding neurodevelopmental disorders. Dev Psychol. 2013; 49(1): 45– 58 22390668
  37. [54]Rosenberg CE The tyranny of diagnosis: Specific entities and individual experience. Milbank Q. 2002; 80(2): 237– 260 12101872 PMC2690110

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, G., Kapp, S. K., Elliott, D., Elphick, C., Gwernan-Jones, R., & Owens, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • College of Sociology, Philosophy and Anthropology, Social Science and International Studies, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Corresponding author
Russell, Ginny
Venue
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2019-04-13
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
124-133
ISSN
  • 2573-9581 (ISSN-L)
  • 2573-959X
OpenAlex
W2928298245
Cited by
193
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism in Adulthood (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (/Z/15/Z, 108676/Z/15/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, hyperfocus, attention to detail, memory, creativity, social interaction, workplace, relationships, support needs, autistic traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review