Cited by 584Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Optimal outcome in individuals with a history of autism

Open access
Fein, Deborah, Barton, Marianne, Eigsti, Inge‐Marie, Kelley, Elizabeth, Naigles, Letitia, Schultz, Robert T., Stevens, Michael, Helt, Molly +4 more·2013·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Although autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are generally considered lifelong disabilities, literature suggests that a minority of individuals with an ASD will lose the diagnosis. However, the existence of this phenomenon, as well as its frequency and interpretation, is still controversial: were they misdiagnosed initially, is this a rare event, did they lose the full diagnosis, but still suffer significant social and communication impairments or did they lose all symptoms of ASD and function socially within the normal range? Methods: The present study documents a group of these optimal outcome individuals (OO group, n = 34) by comparing their functioning on standardized measures to age, sex, and nonverbal IQ matched individuals with high‐functioning autism (HFA group, n = 44) or typical development (TD group, n = 34). For this study, ‘optimal outcome’ requires losing all symptoms of ASD in addition to the diagnosis, and functioning within the nonautistic range of social interaction and communication. Domains explored include language, face recognition, socialization, communication, and autism symptoms. Results: Optimal outcome and TD groups’ mean scores did not differ on socialization, communication, face recognition, or most language subscales, although three OO individuals showed below‐average scores on face recognition. Early in their development, the OO group displayed milder symptoms than the HFA group in the social domain, but had equally severe difficulties with communication and repetitive behaviors. Conclusions: Although possible deficits in more subtle aspects of social interaction or cognition are not ruled out, the results substantiate the possibility of OO from autism spectrum disorders and demonstrate an overall level of functioning within normal limits for this group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12037

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small subset of children with ASD may lose the diagnosis and reach an optimal outcome; such children probably have less severe symptoms and stronger cognitive skills.

    “In addition, several recent studies have revealed that a small portion of children with ASDs may be able to progress sufficiently to lose their ASD diagnosis and attain an “optimal outcome”, and these children are likely to be those with relatively milder symptoms and higher cognitive functioning.”
  • There are contrasting views on the strength of the evidence for universal population-wide testing for ASD.

    “However, there are contrasting views on the strength of the evidence for universal population-wide testing 145,146”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [146]

    The Method (Participants and Measures; page unavailable) describes screening and diagnostic assessment of study participants, not universal population-wide ASD testing. The Discussion (page unavailable) addresses outcomes after an ASD diagnosis. Searches for population-wide screening and disagreement about its evidence found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fein, D., Barton, M., Eigsti, I., Kelley, E., Naigles, L., Schultz, R. T., Stevens, M., Helt, M., Orinstein, A., Rosenthal, M., Troyb, E., & Tyson, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Hartford Hospital (US)
  • Child Mind Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-16
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
195-205
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2145215768
Cited by
584
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 27
FWCI
32.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076189)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, optimal outcomes, high-functioning autism, social functioning, communication, face recognition (cognition), social interaction, repetitive behavior, language development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Autistic Disorder, Child, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Remission, Spontaneous, Sex Factors, Wechsler Scales, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review