Cited by 23Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity and Health PracticesBody Contouring and Surgery

Loss to follow-up after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery – a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Kedestig, Jonna, Stenberg, Erik·2019·Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Abstract

Background Follow-up after bariatric surgery is important if we are to identify long-term complications at an early stage and thereby improve long-term outcome. Despite great efforts, many patients are lost to follow-up. Definition of characteristics of patients failing to attend follow-up could help in defining a specific group for whom extra resources may be applied to improve the situation.Objectives To identify characteristics of patients failing to attend follow-up 2 years after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.Setting Multicenter study, Sweden.Methods Post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial in which preoperative patient characteristics and postoperative outcome measures were compared between patients who attended or did not attend a 2-year follow-up visit after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.Results Of the 2495 patients included, 260 did not attend a 2-year follow-up visit. Factors associated with higher risk for failure to attend were younger age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] .96, 95% confidence interval [CI] .94-.98/yr, P < .001); male sex (adjusted OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.51-3.63, P < .001); depression (adjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.47, P = .029); history of smoking (adjusted OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.26-2.51, P = .001); being single (adjusted OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03-2.11, P = .036); and being first-generation immigrant (adjusted OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.05-2.88; P = .032). Elementary occupation (adjusted OR .42, 95% CI .18-.99, P = .047) was associated with lower risk.Conclusion These findings indicate that there are preoperative characteristics that may help in identifying patients likely to fail to attend follow-up visits after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Special effort should be made to inform these patients of the importance of follow-up and to encourage them to attend.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.010

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pre-operative diagnosis of depression was predictive of missing follow-up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies.

    “Pre‐operative diagnosis of depression, high levels of depressive symptomology, and a history of pharmacological treatment of depression were predictive of missing follow‐up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies. 13 , 18 , 19”
  • A history of pharmacological treatment of depression was predictive of missing follow-up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies.

    “Pre‐operative diagnosis of depression, high levels of depressive symptomology, and a history of pharmacological treatment of depression were predictive of missing follow‐up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies. 13 , 18 , 19”
  • High levels of pre-operative depressive symptomology were predictive of missing follow-up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies.

    “Pre‐operative diagnosis of depression, high levels of depressive symptomology, and a history of pharmacological treatment of depression were predictive of missing follow‐up appointments in the 24 months after gastric bypass surgery in three separate studies. 13 , 18 , 19”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kedestig, J., & Stenberg, E.
Affiliations
Örebro University (SE)
Corresponding author
Stenberg, Erik
Venue
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
880-886
ISSN
1550-7289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2923185356
Cited by
23
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Örebro Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
loss to follow-up, laparoscopic gastric bypass
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Patient Compliance, Laparoscopy, Sweden, Gastric Bypass, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Lost to Follow-Up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review