Cited by 101Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataThoreau and American LiteratureData Quality and Management

A Review of Anonymization for Healthcare Data

Open access
Olatunji, Iyiola E., Rauch, Jens, Katzensteiner, Matthias, Khosla, Megha·2024·Big Data

Abstract

Mining health data can lead to faster medical decisions, improvement in the quality of treatment, disease prevention, and reduced cost, and it drives innovative solutions within the healthcare sector. However, health data are highly sensitive and subject to regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation, which aims to ensure patient's privacy. Anonymization or removal of patient identifiable information, although the most conventional way, is the first important step to adhere to the regulations and incorporate privacy concerns. In this article, we review the existing anonymization techniques and their applicability to various types (relational and graph based) of health data. Besides, we provide an overview of possible attacks on anonymized data. We illustrate via a reconstruction attack that anonymization, although necessary, is not sufficient to address patient privacy and discuss methods for protecting against such attacks. Finally, we discuss tools that can be used to achieve anonymization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/big.2021.0169

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [15][15] Alina Campan, Traian Marius Truta, and Nicholas Cooper. Psensitive k-anonymity with generalization constraints. Trans. Data Priv. , 3(2):65-89, 2010. -
  2. [46][46] Jong Wook Kim, Beakcheol Jang, and Hoon Yoo. Privacypreserving aggregation of personal health data streams. PloS one , 13(11):e0207639, 2018. -
  3. [61][61] Lihao Liu, Qi Dou, Hao Chen, Iyiola E Olatunji, Jing Qin, and Pheng-Ann Heng. Mtmr-net: Multi-task deep learning with margin ranking loss for lung nodule analysis. In Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support , pages 74-82. Springer, 2018. -
  4. [62][62] Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Daniel Kifer, Johannes Gehrke, and Muthuramakrishnan Venkitasubramaniam. l-diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACMTransactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) , 1(1):3-es, 2007. -
  5. [67][67] EsmaeilMohammadian, MortezaNoferesti, andRasoolJalili. Fast: fast anonymization of big data streams. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Big Data Science and Computing , pages 1-8, 2014. -
  6. [69][69] Prashanth Mohan, Abhradeep Thakurta, Elaine Shi, Dawn Song, and David Culler. Gupt: privacy preserving data analysis made easy. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data , pages 349-360, 2012. -
  7. [72][72] Arvind Narayanan and Vitaly Shmatikov. Robust deanonymization of large sparse datasets. In 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (sp 2008) , pages 111-125. IEEE, 2008. -
  8. [81][81] European Parliament and Council of the European Union. General data protection regulation. Official Journal of the European Union , 2016. URL https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679 . -
  9. [94][94] Xiaoxun Sun, Lili Sun, and Hua Wang. Extended kanonymity models against sensitive attribute disclosure. Computer Communications , 34(4):526-535, 2011. -
  10. [103][103] Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, Jiuyong Li, Ada Wai-Chee Fu, and Ke Wang. ( α , k)-anonymity: an enhanced k-anonymity model for privacy preserving data publishing. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , pages 754-759, 2006. -
  11. [112][112] Jun Zhang, Graham Cormode, Cecilia M Procopiuc, Divesh Srivastava, and Xiaokui Xiao. Privbayes: Private data release via bayesian networks. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) , 42(4):1-41, 2017. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olatunji, I. E., Rauch, J., Katzensteiner, M., & Khosla, M.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • Hochschule Osnabrück (DE)
  • Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Olatunji, Iyiola E.
Venue
Big Data
Published
2024-12-01
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
538-555
ISSN
  • 2167-6461 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-647X
OpenAlex
W3153562187
Cited by
101
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Big Data (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
Keywords
data anonymization, healthcare data privacy, patient privacy, General Data Protection Regulation, reconstruction attacks, relational data, privacy-preserving data mining
MeSH terms
Data Anonymization, Confidentiality, Humans, Computer Security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review