Cited by 833Ethics in Clinical ResearchOrgan Donation and TransplantationGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

A Novel Approach to High-Quality Postmortem Tissue Procurement: The GTEx Project

Open access
Carithers, Latarsha J., Ardlie, Kristin, Barcus, Mary, Branton, Philip A., Britton, Angela, Buia, Stephen A., Compton, Carolyn C., DeLuca, David S. +20 more·2015·Biopreservation and Biobanking

Abstract

The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, sponsored by the NIH Common Fund, was established to study the correlation between human genetic variation and tissue-specific gene expression in non-diseased individuals. A significant challenge was the collection of high-quality biospecimens for extensive genomic analyses. Here we describe how a successful infrastructure for biospecimen procurement was developed and implemented by multiple research partners to support the prospective collection, annotation, and distribution of blood, tissues, and cell lines for the GTEx project. Other research projects can follow this model and form beneficial partnerships with rapid autopsy and organ procurement organizations to collect high quality biospecimens and associated clinical data for genomic studies. Biospecimens, clinical and genomic data, and Standard Operating Procedures guiding biospecimen collection for the GTEx project are available to the research community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/bio.2015.0032

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DOCK4 is expressed in kidney in GTEx v8.

    “DOCK4 is expressed in kidney in GTEx v8, and Dock4 is expressed in mouse kidney proximal tubule cells and distal convoluted tubule cells.”

    From Multi-trait association studies discover pleiotropic loci between Alzheimer’s disease and cardiometabolic traits (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Discussion (page not specified) says GTEx RNA-sequencing and expression data are publicly available, but does not report DOCK4 expression in kidney. Searches for DOCK4 kidney expression and GTEx v8 kidney gene expression found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dock4 is expressed in mouse kidney proximal tubule cells and distal convoluted tubule cells.

    “DOCK4 is expressed in kidney in GTEx v8, and Dock4 is expressed in mouse kidney proximal tubule cells and distal convoluted tubule cells.”

    From Multi-trait association studies discover pleiotropic loci between Alzheimer’s disease and cardiometabolic traits (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Introduction describes GTEx as a project studying gene expression in human tissues, and the Discussion describes its publicly available expression data. Searches for Dock4, mouse kidney proximal tubule cells, and distal convoluted tubule cells found no passage addressing the attributed mouse-cell expression claim. The cited paper therefore does not verify that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [1]The GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nature Genetics 2013; 45: 580– 585 23715323 PMC4010069
  2. [2]Sun W, Hu Y eQTL mapping using RNA-seq data. Stat Biosci 2013; 5: 198– 219 23667399 PMC3650863
  3. [3]The GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Pilot Analysis: Multi-tissue gene regulation in humans. Science 2015; 348: 648– 660 25954001 PMC4547484
  4. [4]Mucci NR, Moore H, Brigham LE, et al. Meeting research needs with postmortem biospecimen donation: Summary of recommendations for postmortem recovery of normal human biospecimens for research. Biopreserv Biobank 2013; 11: 77– 82 24845428
  5. [6]Siminoff LA, Traino HM, Mosavel M, Barker L, Gudger G, Undale A. Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research. Genet Med 2015 Epub ahead of print 9 4 2015 PMC4600004 25856669
  6. [7]Staniszewski W. Virtual microscopy, data management and image analysis in Aperio ScanScope system. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2009; 47: 699– 701 20430741
  7. [8]Gallego Romero I, Pai AA, Tung J, Gilad Y RNA-seq: Impact of RNA degradation on transcript quantification. BMC Biol 2014; 12: 42 24885439 PMC4071332
  8. [9]Groelz D, Sobin L, Branton P, Compton C, Wyrich R, Rainen L Non-formalin fixative versus formalin-fixed tissue: A comparison of histology and RNA quality. Exper Mol Pathol 2013; 94: 188– 194 22814231
  9. [10]Mailman MD, Feolo M, Jin Y, et al. The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nature Genetics 2007; 39: 1181– 1186 17898773 PMC2031016
  10. [11]The GTEx Consortium. Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science 2015; 348: 648– 660 25954001 PMC4547484
  11. [12]Baran Y, Subramaniam M, Biton A, et al. The landscape of genomic imprinting across diverse adult human tissues. Genome Res 2015; 25: 927– 936 25953952 PMC4484390
  12. [13]Gibson G. GTEx detects genetic effects. Science 2015; 348: 640– 641 25953996
  13. [14]Mele M, Ferreira PG, Reverter F, et al. The human transcriptome across tissues and individuals. Science 2015; 348: 660– 665 25954002 PMC4547472
  14. [17]Roosing S, Hofree M, Kim S, et al. Functional genome-wide siRNA screen identifies as mutated in Joubert syndrome. eLife. 2015; 4 PMC4477441 26026149

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carithers, L. J., Ardlie, K., Barcus, M., Branton, P. A., Britton, A., Buia, S. A., Compton, C. C., DeLuca, D. S., Peter-Demchok, J., Gelfand, E. T., Guan, P., Korzeniewski, G. E., Lockhart, N. C., Rabiner, C. A., Rao, A. K., Robinson, K. L., Roche, N. V., Sawyer, S. J., Segrè, A. V., Shive, C. E., Smith, A. M., Sobin, L. H., Undale, A. H., Valentino, K. M., Vaught, J., Young, T. R., Moore, H. M., & on behalf of the GTEx Consortium
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Leidos Biomedical Research Inc. (United States) (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Corresponding author
Moore, Helen M.
Venue
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Published
2015-10-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
311-319
ISSN
  • 1947-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-5543
OpenAlex
W2342127666
Cited by
833
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1
FWCI
43.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biopreservation and Biobanking (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN268201000029C, HHSN261200800001E, 10XS170, 10XS171, 10X172)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA006227)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG007610)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016056)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK020595)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
rapid autopsy, organ procurement, tissue-specific gene expression, genetic variation, cell lines, blood samples, research collaboration
MeSH terms
Humans, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Tissue Banks, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review