Cited by 63

The Relevance of Pharmacokinetic Studies in Designing Efficacy Trials in Juvenile Major Depression

Findling, Robert L., McNamara, Nora K., Stansbrey, Robert J., Feeny, Norah C., Young, Christopher M., Peric, Franco V., Youngstrom, Eric A.·2006·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Introduction Identifying evidence-based dosing strategies is a key part of new drug development in pediatric populations. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies can provide important information regarding how best to dose medications in children and adolescents. Utilizing scientifically supported dosing strategies provides the best chance for any given drug to demonstrate both efficacy and acceptable tolerability in definitive, placebo-controlled studies. Methods Results of both PK studies and randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy trials (RPCTs) in juvenile major depressive disorder (MDD) are reviewed. The degree to which the medication dosing strategies that were employed in the efficacy studies were supported by the extant PK data is considered. Medications that are reviewed include fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, venlafaxine, nefazodone, and mirtazapine. Results In many instances, the dosing paradigms that were used in the RPCTs differed, sometimes substantially, from the dosing strategies that would have been supported based on the results of PK studies. Conclusions Medication dosing regimens may have contributed to the failure of several RPCTs to show drug efficacy in the treatment of pediatric MDD. In addition, the doses of medication used in these RPCTs may also have contributed to the safety and tolerability concerns that have been raised with these drugs. PK and dose-ranging studies should be performed prior to the initiation of definitive effic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cap.2006.16.131

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Findling, R. L., McNamara, N. K., Stansbrey, R. J., Feeny, N. C., Young, C. M., Peric, F. V., & Youngstrom, E. A.
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-03
Volume
16
Issue
1-2
Pages
131-145
ISSN
  • 1044-5463
  • 1557-8992
Cited by
63
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review